>>4854665

Theory on the significance of Q's confirmed delta markers:

[0] = POTUS and Q are together

[1] = Message Confirming Q or Crumbs

[5] = Message Related to Crumbs

[10] = Delta Test with Message

[15] = Delta Test (comms test)

[1 year delta] = some events occur a year after Q informed anons about it, or are reoccurring yearly

(example of an event occurring a year after Q informed anons about it was "Flynn is safe")

(example of an event reoccurring yearly is the camp david pen pics)

"Wind the clock w/ all markers" seems to indicate the "Clock" is a DELTA COUNTER, using the confirmed DELTA MARKERS of [0], [1], [5], [10], [15], and [1 year] for COMMS

IMO, THE CLOCK IS ESSENTIALLY A METAPHORICAL STOPWATCH

*Notes:

• just a theory based off confirmed deltas, AND HOW THEY ARE USED BY Q AND POTUS

• these deltas are in units of MINUTES, but anything less than a [1] delta is a [0] delta

(crumb #2140 for example confirms this)

• a delta can be between a crumb and a tweet/retweet, between tweets/retweets, or between crumbs and crumbs

(this includes tweets that correct misspelling, which also matter for comms)

• there are exists unintentional deltas

(crumb #2616 for example confirmed this)

• NOT EVERY [#] is a delta marker, and many [#] are just general markers

(context matters)

• NOT EVERY delta is a confirmed delta MARKER

([6] and [7] are examples)

— Theory of the [6] and [7] deltas based on their usage (can only find one confirmed occurrence for each):

[6] = Device Delta Test

[7] = Word For Word Message

— Q also replied once about a [2] delta

(crumb #1756 for the [2] delta)

— Q also replied once for a [22] delta

(crumb #606 for the [22] delta, but I'm pretty sure it's a 21 minute delta, so not adding or thinking about)

— Q also noted a [17] delta between POTUS' tweets when he acknowledged an anon's request

(pun intended, crumb #2577)

• NOT EVERY DELTA IS SHOWN IN THE GRAPHIC, just included the ones that were confirmed

— WOULD LOVE TO KNOW OTHER DELTAS TO SEE IF THIS THEORY HOLDS FOR THEM TOO

REMINDER JUST A THEORY

so, an excel sheet would allow us to see how many times the [0], [1], [5], [10], and [15] (also the [6] and [7]) deltas happened

we could see if comms are being established using the deltas, like the crumbs seem to indicate to me

the spread sheet would have:

dates of crumbs

dates of tweets

timestamp in h:m:s of crumbs

timestamp in h:m:s of tweets

then the ability to somehow know how many have [0], [1], [5], [10], and [15] (also the [6] and [7]) deltas IN MINUTES (because Q seems to indicate they are in minutes)

>>4855404

basically, we want to know all the times significant deltas occurred, and see if there are comms in those deltas

[0], [1], [5], [10], and [15] (also the [6] and [7]) deltas IN MINUTES

see: >>4854928, >>4855131

we're figuring out how to do that, but I really don't know how to personally

kek, seems anons do

>>4854665

>[RR-Out] is a marker, but not a delta marker

>DELTA markers are different than regular markers

ALL DELTA MARKERS ARE MARKERS, BUT NOT ALL MARKERS ARE DELTA MARKERS

I think this is a good example (OP pic and this pic)

so, 2 days before POTUS tweets about Ronald Reagan (double meaning of RR; used now as Rod Rosenstein) and Q says "marker missed?", Q posts "/[RR-out][P_pers]"

imo (just theorizing), this means Q dropped that crumb as a MARKER meaning POTUS would tweet (from his personal device) about RonaldReagan and the way they tried to take him out

and because anons didn't note it, Q asked if we missed the marker

So Q used markers for comms, AND delta markers for comms

this is a great example of this imo

>>4855779

and again, I've just been focusing on the [0], [1], [5], [10], and [15] (also the [6] and [7]) delta markers in minutes

it's unclear to me as of now how the other markers fit in

again, focusing on:

[0] = POTUS and Q are together

[1] = Message Confirming Q or Crumbs

[5] = Message Related to Crumbs

[10] = Delta Test with Message

[15] = Delta Test (comms test)

[1 year delta] = some events occur a year after Q informed anons about it, or are reoccurring yearly

AND

[6] = Device Delta Test

[7] = Word For Word Message

>>4855932

just thinking of combos:

• tweet and tweet

• tweet and retweet

• retweet and retweet

• crumb and crumb

• crumb and tweet

• crumb and retweet

but check what this anon is doing: >>4591252 ("timestamp decode thread")

I think that anon has a database for POTUS tweets

not sure what those "delta shifts" are though

>>4855995

so this is what I've been assuming are "markers" (pic)

essentially [x] is a marker

so some "regular markers" are numbers, words, phrases, etc; but the delta markers are specifically numbers

>>4856027

hmmmm

that seems to have basically what we're looking for

but for the [15] and [10] markers that Q confirmed, they're not shown

[15] on 11/4/17

[10] on 12/23/17

>>4856152

>even the delta markers are less about the numbers themselves and more about what they signify on the clock/map, i.e. comms?

true, but as I've said, I think each confirmed delta has a specific comm/meaning to it

the [0] delta is the most obvious one because it shows Q and POTUS are together, but for example the [1], [5], [10], and [15] deltas are not as intuitive, but I think they have specific meanings

>the numbers point to the comms so these regular markers are like one step closer in that they are more direct comms - at least that's how i see it

as for the other, non-delta markers, I agree with you

we'd need to look into tweets after those markers, but they could be comms or hints of what's being tweeted

like the 'missing marker' one: >>4855779

>i also always assumed that the timestamp of the post with the marker was the marker as well but i'm seeing now i might be wrong about that, idk

these are all just theories until Q confirms imo

>>4856249

>We are talking Q post timestamp compared to DJT tweet time?

yes, for these three deltas it's crumb vs tweet:

these are the dates and timestamps of the crumb (in the 2nd post's graphic)

[5]: 12/23/17 ; 15:22:21 EST

[10]: 12/12/17 ; 17:03:32 EST

[15]: 11/4/17 ; 19:28:58 EST

and the pics are what I'm finding in the spread sheet (pic1 is 15, pic2 is 10, pic3 is 5)

>>4856370

just noticed I think they're in CST too

>>4856297

understood and I think that's a good idea

essentially, it'd be great if we could know how many 15, 10, 5, 1, and 0 deltas there have been between all those combos

then we could see if there is any pattern in those deltas (which Q confirmed to be significant)

my graphic here: >>4854731 show each delta, and the context in which Q used them is why I think the specific deltas have a comm (meaning)

>>4856249

>>4856370

wait, I'm not sure which one I was in, but this one has all the deltas by the minute delta they were

the 11/4 [15] delta is there; but the 12/12 [10] delta and the 12/23 [5] delta are not

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OqTR0hPipmL9NE4u_JAzBiWXov3YYOIZIw6nPe3t4wo/edit#gid=1799018260

I'm not even sure what these "deltas" are

but the data might be useful for the codefags

>>4856580

kek, in reference to these sheets:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OqTR0hPipmL9NE4u_JAzBiWXov3YYOIZIw6nPe3t4wo/edit#gid=1064245675

Found this on trumptwitterarchive.com ; not sure if useful:

https://github.com/bpb27/trump_tweet_data_archive

https://github.com/bpb27/political_twitter_archive

https://github.com/bpb27/twitter_scraping

http://trumptwitterarchive.com/howto/all_tweets.html

>>4856604

all good, still working this stuff out

>>4856795

exactly

>>4856834

I clarified it, you nigger

>>4856865

see the bottom part of the graphic (15 part): >>4854731

all in EST

>>4857314

exactly

though imo the marker in that pic is in that vid (at (1:07 in the video, it literally shows dark to light)

but on the several types of markers, pic2 is an great example

so the [:22], [:27], [5], and [10] have to do with the delta markers

but [#2] is a reoccurring marker meaning McCabe (#2 at the FBI)

>>4857546

>>4857540

haven't thought about that one

good connection though

>>4857480

>No. 100 refers to /greatawakening/ post #100

true, and I use qanon.pub because has the active links to the post numbers

but that's a good point, I do think the map and the clock are related somehow, likely by the markers

(made this, it's the "markers" before the post where Q says to wind the clock w/ all markers)

and marker (imo) = [something]

>>4861997

>>4862397

am I reading this right?

those are [5] and [0] deltas?

>>4861997

>>4862397

>>4863209

and this was something I was mentioning

this looks like a [0] delta because of the minute timestamp, but in reality it's essentially one hour apart

>>4863570

if you're talking about the map (which I'm also interested in pursuing), check out what QMAP has:

https://qmap.pub/analytics/network

it'd be great to make something like it, but a stand alone graphic that doesn't need to be searched to use

>>4863895

ok, so:

a negative delta = POTUS inb4 Q

a positive delta = Q inb4 POTUS

that right?

>>4864080

understood, sounds good

THERE HAVE BEEN TWO THINGS I'VE BEEN THINKING ABOUT RECENTLY:

The Map

I envision the map being a "Mind Map" or "spider map" that has all the connections between people, organizations, agencies, markers etc

(see the pic)

this is what QMap.pub has been working on

what would be ideal is a stand alone, interactive graphic with all the connections Q has informed us about

The Clock

then the clock is basically this delta stuff

essentially the [#] delta has a specific comm associated with it, a "stopwatch" like metaphor where deltas are observed and analyzed to see if there is a pattern of comms

I'm not a codefag, so I have no clue how to go about doing this, but I think this is what Q wants by The Map and The Clock

>>4864098

that's actually a good feature, can easily show who was first

because in my graphic, most are Q inb4 POTUS

the [0] delta is due to the lag/processing like Q said, but there have been [0] deltas where Q is first

>>4864170

>and then winding the clock forward, if I am getting it right?

imo, the "wind the clock" stuff is metaphorical

on old stopwatches, you would literally wind it back to the 0 positions

and in this metaphor, after a crumb or a tweet, you'd metaphorical reset the stopwatch to look for another delta if no delta came

if one did, you'd metaphorically reset it or rewind after recording the delta

as for the other tweets besides POTUS', not sure if that's legit because Q has never mentioned deltas with other people's tweets, just POTUS'

I'm just basing all my theoretical thinking off of crumbs

>>4865749

thanks anon

this is going back to the fundamentals of Q, deltas, markers, timestamps, the clock, the map, etc

but this is looking great:

https://qanon.news/deltas.html

it's got the deltas between crumbs and tweets

these are EXACT deltas, and some of them Q wants use to look at the minutes it seems

so something that's 14:20 (m:s) or something could be a [15] delta if the minutes line up

anons are working on other shit too

just theorizing and formalizing things, this thread is for both the deltas and the map, two projects worth thinking about

>>4866188

>>4866129

imagine this for what I mean as a "delta counter"

when a crumb or a tweet is posted, you "start the clock"

if another is posted, you count the delta then record it, and after you'd "rewind the clock" back to it's 0 positions

if another isn't posted, you "rewind the clock" back to it's 0 positions anyway

all metaphorically

>>4866213

put that line there to make it a Q because I'm a fag

>>4866220

>>4866213

>>4866213

>>4866253

>>4866328

added a "number window" so you can put the # of mins/secs and a place to put the delta

this "graphic" is basically unneeded, but just a way to visualize it

>>4854731

>>4867207

>do everything MANUALLY

that's exactly what I would've done

KEK

thank god for codefags, I'm just theorizing and making graphics

>>4864098

just a request, not sure how plausible it is

would it be possible to NOT show the seconds for the [1], [5], [10], and [15], meaning only show the difference between the minute timestamp, then SHOW the seconds for the [0] deltas?

can rephrase if needed

>>4854731

updating a part of the theory's notes

>a delta can be between a crumb and a tweet/retweet, between tweets/retweets, or between crumbs and crumbs

it doesn't seem like the deltas other than the [15] would be relevant for anything BUT crumb-(re)tweet comms

>>4869371

fuck meant the [0] delta

the [0] delta is only relevant for crumb-(re)tweets

the other deltas can be relevant for the other combos

>>4869475

look at both the [5] and [7] for examples since you mentioned them

BOTH, Q was before POTUS

in the [5], same exact topic, it the [7], legitimately word for word

that's why I don't think this has anything to do with "Trust Q", especially because Q was before POTUS in every delta in that graphic except the [0]'s (but it's do to the differing lag)

didn't put this one in due to space, but this is a [0] delta where Q is inb4 POTUS

and on that [15] then [1], Q used the win/when this to allude to a tweet about goodwin, in which POTUS had the Q misspelling

but on your last paragraph, that's what we're trying to do

we're trying to see if seemingly random crumbs that are hard to understand have a delta, and if that delta indicates something about a connection to the crumb and the tweet

but of course, this is just a theory, in its early stages too

>>4869542

and the meanings of the deltas are JUST THEORIES

maybe they have different significances when it comes to comms

except the [0] and [1 year], they're kind of self explanatory imo

using https://qanon.news/deltas.html , if my theory is right, Q was with POTUS when they posted the tweet and crumb

Q inb4 POTUS

and the 7 second delta is one of the closest when Q is inb4 POTUS, besides a 6 second delta last year

just trying to formalize the theories, still a work in progress

>>4870383

>>4870390

that's why I'm refining the theory

I'm not sure if every delta applies to every combo of tweet, retweet, and crumb

for example, the 0 delta is ONLY for crumb-(re)tweet

still working on it and finding other examples

>>4870383

oh, and that's a delta between Q and POTUS, not POTUS and POTUS

>>4870613

true, but if that were the case, they'd do it all the time and the deltas are rare

but theoretically, let's say they do time them, those posts that make the deltas would have a heightened significance imo

>>4873068

exactly that

and eventually be able to filter for a specific delta (showing all deltas of that #)

but no rush, just got back on

>>4872825

it would be interesting if there was a day of the week aspect to these comms

>>4878014

that's a cool theory

work on it

the anon above was working on the Jefferson's Great Clock theory for a little and found a pattern too

anons are also working on map theories in addition to clock theories in this thread

inadvertent bump

>>4879088

>>4878961

well, it is obvious, but the [0] (being together) and [1 year] (happening yearly or occurring one year after Q posted about it) are the most obvious

the harder ones to know the significances of are the [1], [5], [10], and [15] deltas

>>4879088

but EXACTLY

I'm just looking at the deltas Q confirmed, and seeing if there is a meaning to the deltas, which are in the 2nd post of this thread

it's just a theory

and once we have EVERY delta listed, we can look each [0], [1], [5] etc delta and find a pattern or meaning

>for example a [5] delta means the tweets/posts will be relevant in 5 days/weeks/months etc.

look into it, a lot of things are plausible imo

my theory was ORIGINALLY just going to be a graphic showing the [15], [10], [5], and [1] delta that culminated on 1/7/18 with a foreshadowing of the [0] delta

but thought their could be a specific comm associated with the specific delta

>>4881289

use this as an example

this is in fact a [15] delta, if you only count it buy the minute timestamp

>>4881525

trust the clam

>>4881584

*by

inb4 grammar nazis

>>4881859

no, you've been doing them right, especially for the 0 deltas, that's awesome to see all of them and the exact delta

but if possible, it'd be nice to see just the pure minute deltas between the [15], [10], [5], and [1] deltas

that one as an example:

28 → 43 is [15]

but 28:58 → 43:08 is 14:10

only if possible

>>4881859

>>4881969

this is a MUCH better example

Q CONFIRMED this as a [10] delta

03:32 → 13:12 = 09:40

BUT Q IS ONLY REFERENCING THE MINUTES

3 → 13 = [10]

==UPDATED THE PICS TO JUST SHOW MINUTES (still have the ones with seconds too)

>>4882520

I'm assuming that's for the 'trust the clam' and not the talk of deltas

>>4882701

> the post with 1:07?

(pic)

and kek, I see the title

it's a plausible and simple theory

all based off crumbs and Q's usage of the deltas for what seem like comms

Updated the graphic to only have the minute marker

>>4882872

thanks for the shoutout

but also mapfagging, excelfagging, "clock"fagging, and deltafagging

kek

>>4881859

actually anon, I think it ALL should be in JUST minutes

but keep the timestamps so if desired, an anon can see how many seconds a [0] delta was off by

updated

still no theory on the [2] delta

>>4883175

unclear wording

the delta markers were confirmed, not the theories

except the [1 year]) is kind of self explanatory, so is the [0] imo

>>4883234

see: >>4883012

the left side (read from bottom to top)

>>4884620

>If I'm shitting up your bread let me know.

no, you're not

all theories are just as plausible until they're discussed moar

but I'm baking (there seems to be a lot of bakers in this thread) right now, so I'll look at your post likely in the morning

it's a long one, just saw it and want to see what you're getting at

and besides, it keeps it bumped

>>4889787

>>4886185

that looks fucking great, exactly what I was meaning

thank you, I'll start looking through it in detail

>>4887615

>I agree with everyone who says delta are calculated by minutes only

Q has confirmed this too

but what you're saying above is what I was seeing to

Q has been literally teaching us how to read the deltas AND the stringers too

>>4889864

made a graphic on that one: >>4869712

on the "making a connection leads to uncovering", that line doesn't seem to fit in that crumb

but if Q is referring to the [0], delta that'd be really interesting

and Q I think is referring to crumb #2658 when Q said "Think Drop Yesterday", meaning Q and POTUS (literally together) are focusing on the MSM/Fake News

>>4889864

there's a gap in the crumbs

>>4890220

>only crumbs with deltas.

ok, just wondering, thanks

> Q can confirm?

on that, when Q starts posting again, maybe we'll have moved this theory along so that detailed questions can be asked

I guess it'd start with the theories of detlas as comms

>>4884287

>So before 12/09 Q does not mention timestamp but on that day he does so why look for a 15 delta prior to that date?

that's what I noticed, there are a couple [15] deltas, and the first one is the one I put in my graphic (from 11/4/17)

>>4896118

>are we only using same-day deltas?

yes, at least for my theory yes

it could be that Q is doing deltas over days, but the examples Q pointed out are the same day and hour

>>4896571

>except for the one that was 2 days later

which one was that??

>>4897701

>>4897720

>>4897740

oohhhh ok gotcha

yup, made a graphic on this one

but it seems to me the two days was between the mention of RR (in this case Reagan) not between the timestamps

still thinking about the relevance of the timestamps, don't see anything

>>4897762

>>4897776

>Q was trying to show/teach us something

definitely agree with that

unsure what it means though, but that's definitely significant

might be others, but a very notable time Q said we missed a marker

>>4897807

>>4897821

>>4897834

agreed, unclear what its meaning/significance is to me still

gotta keep looking at it

but this is a good delta/timestamp/marker post to study, __because it ties in STRINGERS too

most of that [RR-out] post is stringers

I'll keep looking at it tomorrow

>>4897838

>tomorrow

*morning

whatever, kek

>>4899438

agreed on most of that post

except on this:

>Subsequent posts [on here] were then made by Anons.

>Timestamps verify.

Q was simply saying other were making posts using the tripcode, and the timestamps verify it was not Q, but anons fucking around

though, it shows timestamps are important for verifications

I'm totaling all the significant deltas based on the deltas shown on https://qanon.news/deltas.html

BUT, if you look at my graphic, it seems Q's confirmed deltas are ALL Q inb4 POTUS

so I'm going to tally each delta, then make a different tally of the ones that are ONLY Q inb4 POTUS, so essentially only positive deltas

graphic here: >>4883012

interdasting little thing I noticed

if [15] is for delta testing, it seems like Q was trying to get [15] deltas for EACH test, but missed with a [17] and two [16]s before getting the [15]

and the [0] before those indicating POTUS and Q were together testing this

just something I noticed

>>4898880

would it be possible to do a 'filter by delta' feature?

>>4906087

whatever works better/is easier for you

but imo:

0, 1, 5, 10, and 15

the others (2, 6, 7, and 17) if you want, but those were only used once each (and not exactly confirmed by Q, just noted)

DELTA TOTALS:

(BOTH +/- deltas)

[0] = 14

[1] = 33

[5] = 36

[10] = 26

[15] = 24

OTHERS:

[2] = 36

[6] = 42

[7] = 34

[17] = 25

—————————————————-

(JUST deltas)

[0] = 14

[1] = 17

[5] = 17

[10] = 12

[15] = 14

OTHERS:

[2] = 18

[6] = 17

[7] = 18

[17] = 14

([0] isn't +/-)

will compile the list of the crumb# later, I have that

also, I'll recount when the filter is applied

>>4906694

>(JUST deltas)

meant just + deltas

>>4906790

it's not my code, I'm using https://qanon.news/deltas.html

that's a great timeline graphic by the way

and you can use http://www.trumptwitterarchive.com for the seconds timestamp for crumbs

>POTUS-POTUS delta

we're focusing on the Q-POTUS delta at the moment, the POTUS-POTUS deltas are important too, per Q

pretty interdasting when you look at the # of deltas

thought there'd be MUCH moar

(+&-) is the deltas with both Q inb4 POTUS and POTUS inb4 Q; (+) is JUST the deltas with Q inb4 POTUS

>>4913228

>This was supposed to be the MAP but we're not there yet

the map would be something like this on qmap.pub:

https://qmap.pub/analytics/network

a stand lone interactive spider/mind map with all the people, organizations, agencies, and events

you have to search for something on qmap, it'd be great to have a Map as it's own thing

but imo, the clock is just paying attention to deltas

basically two main things in this thread, all need codefags

kek, and I'm not one

>>4917884

I've looked into that when I was thinking about the map

then I tried to find the "43 confirmed connections" and got stuck

then I moved to the deltas

>>4915909

I'm seeing less than I saw without the filter, gonna check it out

>>4919210

something like that

the hardest part of making The Map would be knowing what to put in it and what connections to add

there's so much

going to see if the deltas from https://qanon.news/deltas.html have any significances or comms

we know the ones Q confirmed did, and all those were Q inb4 POTUS (+ delta), so I'm going to start with those

UPDATED

A Nice Example

>>4933573

updated to show est

>>4933951

>>4934004

there's this too:

https://gephi.org

a "Q Map" would be such a large amount of data and connections with all the names, organizations, agencies, events, etc to have all in one Map/Graphic

>>4933630

kek, reposting from general:

so this is essentially how this delta marker theory works

you look for a delta between either POTUS-POTUS or Q-POTUS

the [10] delta, from deltas that Q has confirmed as examples, seems to be a message that isn't easily known (as opposed to a [5] delta where it's a moar overt message)

you metaphorically "start the clock" when a post is made, then "stop the clock" to record the delta

either way, whether there's a significant delta or not, you'd then metaphorically "wind the clock back to 0" to look for another delta

Q's confirmed deltas for comms are [0], [1], [5], [10], and [15]; with mentions or implications of [2], [6], [7], and [17] deltas (once each)

on the J before G, POTUS would've needed to do it this way to be able to make the comms (had to correct it, so J had to come before G)

this was the first in real time application of it, thought it was cool actually

>>4937782

just for space, I could've picked any or all really

they're all related to Huber's GJ(s) I think

updated the simple graphic to just show the confirmed deltas without the theories

realized it's plausible ALL are a message in their own way, not specific to the [#]

(basically, all the confirmed [#] deltas are messages, regardless of the #)

but still going with my theories

>>4942528

messed one up

>>4944481

what do you mean?

>>4947728

>Anons, any working theory on periods of Q silence?

I've thought about it before briefly, but it's always so random it seems I don't go into

it'd be interesting to see if there's some pattern with Q's 'blackouts'

>>4951767

stfu AFLB

>>4949263

>>4948917

>>4948734

>>4948693

>>4948618

>>4948582

>>4948481

>>4949044

those are mathematical series anon

what do you want to apply them to?

>>4949886

>timestamp>delta 5,10,15> clock

>deltas 0,1> markers> news> map

still don't think that's viable

>>4950548

>>4951459

this thread is for BOTH the deltas and the map

carry on, no problem (not OP, just adding my thoughts)

>>4950298

>>4950239

>>4950209

>>4950168

I've been confused by that too

(pic) is something an anon came up with a while ago

but not sure it's a legit decode, but it's something

maybe it'll give you ideas

anyone who is working on the map, this is where I got stuck

if you try to do just names or just organizations, it's more than 43 connections by that time

haven't looked at it in a week or so, so maybe fresh eyes would help

But try to find the 43 connections by 11/24/17

>>4953134

could you repost the link?

is it the qmap pdf?

>>4953024

>>4952877

no problem

kek anon, what made you chose that map?

curious

but I see what you're saying, I think it should be a "spider" or "mind" map, but anons have floated other ideas too

>>4952883

I'm still not sure about that countdown one, which is why I didn't include it in my graphic

I'll look at it later today

>>4952932

definitely worth a try, I got stuck on it and saved it then moved on to the deltas

>>4953718

gotcha, I know the area around there . so it was funny to see it

>>4953508

oh ok that's really interesting actually

I'll be on the look out for patterns like that

>>4959255

we're dealing with deltas markers, your hormones must be fucked up, continually

the map has to do with general markers, which anons are also working on in this thread

you could contribute if you took a break from whatever the fuck you do here

>>4961051

true

it'd be one of the ones I don't really have a theory for

>>4961187

>>4961417

I don't get it, what do you mean by that graphic?

>>4959255

and I know you hate the "Qclock", that's why anons are working on alternatives theories

and anons are working on the map also

>>4960501

definitely going to take a look a the 10 & [10] post

>>4961915

that was me, see: >>4952646

but that's not my graphic, just something I've saved

that sequence for the 1, 2, 3, 4 [10], 5 is:

[15], [5], [3], [10], [5]

>>4961953

>>4961958

understood, I mean, the we'd need to consider all whole numbers up to 15 essentially

my original theory was purely based on the ones Q explicitly noted

like the [0], [1], [5], [10], [15], and [1 year]; and added in the [2], [6], [7], and [17] because Q mentioned them but only once each

all could be looked at though, not ruling anything out, just saying what I focused on and why

>>4961983

to be clear, that [3] delta comes from ANOTHER ANON'S graphic

I just saved it, I didn't make it and I didn't include the [3] delta in my personal theories

>I am here to try to help solve the map/sequence/key/and keystone

good shit, the map is extremely important imo, moar than the clock but the clock (deltas) are important too

imo the map is harder than the clock

I'm really not sure how that anon came to that sequence including the 3 either, maybe just because the "Q/POTUS-3" was there

>>4961806

>>4960501

>>4962060

was just looking at it too

interestingly, the 10 & [10] delta is referenced with "12/7 - 12/17"

that's the "10 days of darkness" (which refers to a blackout at the airport iirc)

so I looked on https://qanon.news/deltas.html for a [10] delta within that day 10 time frame

and the only one is the one Q confirms as the [10] delta]

which is the one in my graphic and serves as the basis for me considering the [10] delta being a comm

then this seems to be BOTH about the map AND the clock:

FLASH_BREAK_

/* /\ /*

Shall we play a game?

Map is critical to understand.

Future unlocks past.

DECLAS_ATL_(past).

News unlocks map.

(above is about the map)

Find the markers.

10 & [10].

12/7 – 12/17.

(above is about the clock)

Concourse F.

Terminal 5.

Private_operated plane (OP)?

ATL -IAD

Extraction/known.

Dark.

Darkness.

Learn double meanings.

SHUTDOWN.

(above is about the map)

Q/POTUS-1

Q/POTUS-2

Q/POTUS-3

Q/POTUS-4 [10]

Q/POTUS-5

“Special Place”

Why are drops highlighted by POTUS shortly thereafter?

Coincidence or message?

“The Great Awakening”

POTUS today.

Unlock?

(above about the clock)

CLAS_OP_IAD_(future).

How about a nice game of chess?

SPLASH.

FOX THREE.

(above about the map, with stringers which are also important)

Q

maybe I'm reading that wrong, but it seems like Q is talking about both the map and clock

>>4962078

>>4962060

definitely going to look into this much moar in detail

>In order: #74, #86, #232, #334, #447

>So:

>Q/POTUS-1 [15] -> #74

>Q/POTUS-2 [15] -> #86

>Q/POTUS-3 [5] -> #232

>Q/POTUS-4 [10] -> #334

>Q/POTUS-5 [5] -> #447

that seems really plausible to me

this seems to be a really important crumb when it comes to understanding the map and crumbs

because stringers are crucial to the map, because they foreshadow events

~~7th~~ ~~8th~~ ~~9th~~ ~~10th~~ ~~11th~~ 12th ~~13th~~ ~~14th~~ ~~15th~~ ~~16th~~ ~~17th~~

the delta happens legitimately in the middle of the 10 days of darkness

(from the 7th to the 17th)

>>4962078

>(which refers to a blackout at the airport iirc)

that's wrong, got confused

think it was NK, but never really sure on this

should make a graphic

>>4962160

I'm not quite sure what you mean on the bottom part

agreed the clock and map are connected though

I'll pick this back up in the afternoon, I've got to go for the night and have things to do in the morning

I think we need to decode every line of that crumb (#365)

>>4962225

wew

I still don't know the significance of that watch or the time; still a lot of questions

so many theories on it, I'm just waiting for moar info

be back later

>>4964870

>you could contribute if you took a break from whatever the fuck you do here

>>4964870

I do not think the clock is the same as the map

I don't think the """Qclock""" is the clock, so anons are working with deltas which Q hints as being related

again, post theories if you want

>>4970027

been busy, but will do a deep look into that crumb later

haven't had the chance to yet

>>4991086

no it isn't

the post numbers change all the time

clockfags thought they had a "confirmation" but it changed

(pic) was deleted crumbs that should count to the post numbers too, it's not a legit way of decoding things

>>4991204

>>4991086

found the clockfag example of being btfo'd by post number

>>4999012

I've had many methodological problems with the "Qclock" personally

partially why I rethought the clock

but yea, #1776 was legit

on Q-Q [0] deltas, I'm sure it's happened before, but thats MUCH easier than doing it with POTUS

and not sure it has any comms associated with it

>>4999177

thanks for the explanation, always wondered that

still looking into the long crumb with that countdown

>>4999484

no one is obscuring anything AFLB

>>5010205

No I personally haven't, it'd be interesting to look at

and I don't think the "Qclock" is the clock Q wanted

haven't had a chance to check the thread in a bit, will get caught up today

it sucks that Q hasn't been posting as much so we can't test the theories

but we need to understand it before we apply it, so the down time is good in that way

found an error, updating

so I'm remaking a bunch of proofs, and came across this [5] minute delta

and a confirmation of Q's stringer by POTUS

pretty cool actually

[0] DELTA TODAY, and https://qanon.news/deltas.html works like a champ

>>5109701

I remade all of those too!

got 45 right now, still making many moar

>>5116840

actually, so I posted this in general: >>5117086 (off bread)

what you're saying actually makes sense, with Mueller's report (blockade removal) HAPPENING LAST

we were thinking Mueller's report would come FIRST

but (excluding Barr in the quote you posted), this is what you're theory would read like in order of happening:

[-90] = [1-4] removal (likely Comey, McCabe, and others at FBI because McCabe = [2] in past crumbs for the FBI)

[-60] = [Ohr] removal

[-45] = [RR] removal [Goodbye #2 [#1 _ oversight of Mueller] (in this case, because context matters, #2 overseeing mueller is RR, while #1 is whitaker)

[-30] = Blockade removal ['Scaramucci' model]

so I think, if your theory is correct, that RR will leave before Mueller's report is issued

and yes, I've been thinking DECLAS = [0]

([0] being the countdown not delta as referenced a lot in this thread)

I'll keep looking at this though, definitely needs to be dug on

>>5117372

gotcha anon, this was cool: >>5112392

the 15th [0] delta, and the website for deltas works perfectly

imo, each [0] delta is a proof

>>5117372

and will keep on that theory of yours

not sure if there's a consensus on what those negative markers are, but yours seems the most plausible so far

[0] deltas

1/3

[0] deltas

2/3

[0] deltas

3/3

pretty cool, have a graphic just to show the delta but also to show what the [1] theory means for this [1] delta

seemingly confirmed

>>5142728

>Also proves seconds don't matter.

exactly, see: >>4882069

there's other examples, but that's a good one

>This was a missed [0] as per Q

true, I just analyzed it as a [1]

>>5117372

>>5117183

>>5116840

just a starter graphic for that theory, I think it's the best one I've seen for this

>>5186884

>>5186866

I'll check this out

nniiiiiccceeee

>>5226309

>>5227442

>>5226309

>>5231549

>>5226309

>>5227442

proof form will be coming later

>>5231733

I think Q meant seconds matter for [0] Deltas, because for the other deltas it goes against Q's confirmed deltas

>>5240616

>That said…the third delta I would have considered a [1]

exactly, I thought it was, but it is ~30 delta, so it's a grey area we need to discuss

>>5243559

>I'm incorporating some logic to allow for a 60 second difference - for [0] deltas only.

exactly, I think we forgot to include that originally.

basically:

[0] can be less the 1 minute

[1] is from 1:00 minute to 1:59 minutes

not sure if it will change the count, because I think I counted them BEFORE you made the change (basing it on pure less than 1 deltas)

>>5263001

the thing is, a negative delta could STILL be a [0] delta

there's a few that are just a few seconds that Q is after POTUS

still not sure actually

posting here in case someone if looking into Q+ posts in regards to the map/clock/deltas etc

>>5594863

kekekekekekekekek

wrong copy

updated simple graphic

updated

>>6319463

>>6320175

>>6320254

>>6320415

>>6320445

this seems like a calendar thing anon

the [-#] crumbs were referenced by Q as the "calendar", not the clock, but definitely worth looking into like you are

I know there's a lot of calendar graphics in notables

Q has mentioned "clock" 31 times. Only five total times, shown above, were they actually in reference to The Clock (all based on the numbering of qanon.pub):

>Q 370 12/18/17

>Clock started - 10 days.

This was in reference to the 10 days of darkness and shutdown, which started on 12/7/17 and ended 12/17/17

>Q 1441 6/10/18

>Start the Clock.

(Comes up twice because Q replied to anon's repost of Q 1441)

This was in reference to the start of the "Week To Remember" about POTUS and KJU's Singapore Summit.

(3 times total for this use)

>Q 564 1/19/18

>Counter-narrative went out @ 4am to MSM contractors [like clockwork].

>Q 628 1/27/18

>The clock is ticking.

>Q 1108 4/9/18

>Like Clockwork.

>Q 2033 8/31/18

>LIKE CLOCKWORK.

>Q 2034 8/31/18

>LIKE CLOCKWORK.

(Comes up twice because Q replied to Q 2033)

>Q 2082 9/4/18

>CLOCKWORK.

>Q 2116 9/7/18

>CLOCKWORK.

>Q 2255 9/21/18

>CLOCKWORK.

>Q 2258 9/21/18

>LIKE CLOCKWORK.

>Q 2626 12/19/18

>The clock is ticking.

(Comes up twice because Q replied to Q 2626)

>Q 2653 1/6/19

>The clock is ticking.

(Comes up twice because Q replied to Q 2653)

>Q 2655 1/6/19

>The clock is ticking.

>Q 2661 1/6/19

>However, the clock is ticking, and, at a select point in time, that option will be expired.

>Q 793 2/18/18

>THE CLOCK IS ACTIVATED.

>Q 2913 3/2/19

>The clock is ticking.

>Q 963 3/23/18

>Clock activated.

>Q 1044 4/6/18

>On the clock.

>Q 1232 4/21/18

>On the clock.

>Q 1433 5/21/18

>When does the clock run out?

All of these are in reference to "clockwork", as in the phrase meaning something is about to happen right on time or regularly, and that metaphorical time when that something is about to happen is coming. They are not related to The Clock, but are a signature separate from The Clock. (21 times total for this use)

>Q 3124 3/20/19

>The face of a watch/clock has multiple versions.

>Incorrect interpretations pushed as statements of fact often lead to pitfalls [stranglehold 'choke' tactic used by attackers].

This is a singular reference to there being multiple interpretations to the watch pictures. This is not related to The Clock, but are related to The Watch, which is a separate tool for comms between Q, POTUS, and /qresearch/.

>>6488277 (megashill saying threads are 0 deltas in general, see the shill's post for context)

>obviously POTUS is not tweeting himself

what the fuck are you talking about?

Each of the examples you just showed are threads, including what you're shilling for today

Twitter threads show the same time for each tweet in the thread.

Stop trying to discredit deltas you fucking shill.

kys rainmain, fuck off already

>>6488412 (megashill saying threads are 0 deltas in general and that two NON-threaded tweets are threads too, see the shill's post for context)

>>6488317 (this post: >>6488576 in general)

>>6488277 (megashill saying threads are 0 deltas in general, see the shill's post for context)

POTUS Twitter Threads Are Not [0] Deltas

>a thread / split up tweets with delta 10 mins.

That's not a thread you stupid fuck, that's just two tweet and IS a [10] delta.

This graphic explains that THREADS do not have deltas and are NOT [0] deltas.

This graphics also shows that deltas are between TWO TWEETS, not threads.

You're actually so stupid it's hilarious.

Go back to posting copypasta and shilling for famefags, paytriots, muh clock, and calling everyone masons you petulant shill.

THE CLOCK

Q lays out the meaning and use of The Clock, starting on 1/7/18, but foreshadowed about The Clock on 1/6/18.

>Q 477 1/6/18

>Timestamp.

>Decipher.

>Think clock.

>Wind the clock w/ all markers.

There are several kinds of markers, but Q defines they are noted in Q 2349 as [Markers].

What is commonly referred to as a "killbox", is really just a marker.

People, places, events, words, letters, and numbers can be markers. There are two different number markers however. There are normal numbers signifying something related to the crumb, but also Delta Markers.

Q had already demonstrated before this crumb that deltas are relevant and important for comms. Q had confirmed the [5], [10], and [15] Delta Markers before this crumb, summarized in Q 455 when Q said "Graphics should be in same time zone. Delta relevant. [5]Today [10]Past [15]Past" meaning the [5] minute delta was done the day of that crumb, and the [10] and [15] minute deltas was done before that crumb.

Timestamps and Delta Markers are used for comms from POTUS, through Q, and finally to anons, which can be viewed as a stopwatch or Clock (pic1).

Q later used a few other delta markers such as [0], [1] (pic2), [6], [7], [17], [30] (days), [1 year], and the countdown negative delta markers (pic3)

The Clock is for looking at deltas between Q and POTUS for comms.

Q then demonstrates how The Clock and delta markers can be used effectively for comms on 1/7/18 (pic3).

>Q 506 1/7/18

>Wind the CLOCK.

>The CLOCK and the GRAPHIC are ESSENTIAL.

This all summed up in pic3.

Q posts a misspelling/miswording of "win" but it should've been "when".

Q then posts this as markers, with the Delta Marker of [15].

POTUS, after Q's post of the [15] Delta Marker, posts two tweets with a 15 minute delta that have a misspelling of "consensual" in the first and about Michael Goodwin in the second.

Q then posts the [1] Delta Marker.

POTUS, after Q's post of the [1] Delta Marker, then posts two tweets again with a 1 minute delta that corrects the misspelling to "consequential", adding a Q, and reposts the part about Michael Goodwin.

Q later says "WE ARE TALKING DIRECTLY TO THIS BOARD. LEARN OUR COMMS" and (Delta) "Marker [1] confirmed. Confirmed: 15, 10, 5, 1", foreshadowing the [0] Delta Marker will be confirmed later, which it has been multiple times (pic3 and pic4).

Q explains this use of The Clock and Delta Markers in Q 506.

Q then clarifies the use of The Clock being for Delta Markers and deltas to decipher comms by saying "This will be the AUTH tool you use when all of this becomes public to provide friends, family, others."

'Winding The Clock with markers' refers to all the Delta Markers.

The Clock is a delta counter or a stopwatch to use when looking for deltas between Q and POTUS for comms.

The Graphic is a simple picture that shows the delta between Q and POTUS (epitomized in pic1, and shown left side of and throughout pic2, and pic3).

>Q 2647 1/5/19

>[1 year delta]

>The clock is ticking.

Q introduces the [1 year] Delta Marker for The Clock while referencing the metaphorical meaning of the signature 'the clock is ticking'.

In Q 2761, Q 2948, Q 3009, and Q 3141, Q acknowledges this theory of The Clock directly in a reply (pic4).

TLDR: The Clock is for checking the deltas using Delta Markers between Q and POTUS to see if there are comms associated with that delta from POTUS, through Q, and finally to anons.

Q has mentioned the word "clock" 31 times. Only five total times, shown above, were they actually in reference to The Clock, the other times seem to be metaphorical and unrelated to The Clock (all based on the numbering of qanon.pub):

>>6485737 (Delta Thread)

Pic 1: Simple representation of The Clock, used for deltas between Q and POTUS.

>>6485714 (Delta Thread)

Pic 2: Graphic of Q's posts on 1/7/18 that explain The Clock.

>>6485717 (Delta Thread)

Pic 3: A "Delta Map" with many (but not all) examples of confirmed delta markers.

>>6485729 (Delta Thread)

Pic 4: Compilation of crumbs where Q acknowledged The Clock directly in a reply.

>>6485733 (Delta Thread)

Theories on The Clock can be found in the Delta Thread:

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/4854665.html

There is a tool on qanon.news for seeing deltas between Q and POTUS:

https://qanon.news/deltas.html

>>6488864

>(pic3)

should be pic2, edited

>>6488864

Qproof on the 1/7/18 run through of The Clock

>>6544845

https://qanon.news/deltas.html

>>6544845

>>6544941

shit, the site is down

>>6550329

we literally went through this yesterday

we agreed that "Delta Markers" are just a placeholder term for Markers that refer specifically to Deltas.

>"an older Q post that has been unlocked by future news"

where did Q say or define that?

>Find the MARKERS

There all in the crumbs, most of the time in brackets, as Q said "in Q 2349 as [Markers]".

> then apply what we can think of to arrange them into Q's countdown.

That's what The Clock is for, Q went from the [15] minute marker to the [10] minute marker to the [5] minute marker to the [1] minute marker then to several [0] markers. We're waiting for the exact [0:00:00] marker now, and imo and others' opinion, that's a GO code.

>>6549856

>>6550372

Damn anon, that's really fucked up to hear.

I hope everything works out though, qanon.news is a great fucking resource for not just deltas but literally everything else.

>>6550377

>There

*they're