This thread was created for two interlinked purposes:

1) for excelfags to try to collaboratively develop a spreadsheet of POTUS's twats and Q drops sortable by time, minute markers, delta markers, and other subject-content markers in the body of the twats/drops themselves. Input and ideas welcome.

and 2) To further develop a system to address Q's asking us to build the map and use his "markers" in the map

Raw data POTUS twats

Nov. 5, 2016 to Jan. 21, 2019

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vQMvZyhM5n1lf-ACCKErJTOA59mcVBrsaVkU3AkKYro/edit?usp=sharing

Anon's working concept of Marker Theory

DELTA markers are different than regular markers

imo for example, the crumb you are referring to is the pic

[RR-Out] is a marker, but not a delta marker

Q does say to 'wind the clock with ALL markers' though, but I'm specifically focusing on the delta markers

and not all [#] markers are delta markers, many examples

>>4854665

Theory on the significance of Q's confirmed delta markers:

[0] = POTUS and Q are together

[1] = Message Confirming Q or Crumbs

[5] = Message Related to Crumbs

[10] = Delta Test with Message

[15] = Delta Test (comms test)

[1 year delta] = some events occur a year after Q informed anons about it, or are reoccurring yearly

(example of an event occurring a year after Q informed anons about it was "Flynn is safe")

(example of an event reoccurring yearly is the camp david pen pics)

"Wind the clock w/ all markers" seems to indicate the "Clock" is a DELTA COUNTER, using the confirmed DELTA MARKERS of [0], [1], [5], [10], [15], and [1 year] for COMMS

IMO, THE CLOCK IS ESSENTIALLY A METAPHORICAL STOPWATCH

*Notes:

• just a theory based off confirmed deltas, AND HOW THEY ARE USED BY Q AND POTUS

• these deltas are in units of MINUTES, but anything less than a [1] delta is a [0] delta

(crumb #2140 for example confirms this)

• a delta can be between a crumb and a tweet/retweet, between tweets/retweets, or between crumbs and crumbs

(this includes tweets that correct misspelling, which also matter for comms)

• there are exists unintentional deltas

(crumb #2616 for example confirmed this)

• NOT EVERY [#] is a delta marker, and many [#] are just general markers

(context matters)

• NOT EVERY delta is a confirmed delta MARKER

([6] and [7] are examples)

— Theory of the [6] and [7] deltas based on their usage (can only find one confirmed occurrence for each):

[6] = Device Delta Test

[7] = Word For Word Message

— Q also replied once about a [2] delta

(crumb #1756 for the [2] delta)

— Q also replied once for a [22] delta

(crumb #606 for the [22] delta, but I'm pretty sure it's a 21 minute delta, so not adding or thinking about)

— Q also noted a [17] delta between POTUS' tweets when he acknowledged an anon's request

(pun intended, crumb #2577)

• NOT EVERY DELTA IS SHOWN IN THE GRAPHIC, just included the ones that were confirmed

— WOULD LOVE TO KNOW OTHER DELTAS TO SEE IF THIS THEORY HOLDS FOR THEM TOO

REMINDER JUST A THEORY

so, an excel sheet would allow us to see how many times the [0], [1], [5], [10], and [15] (also the [6] and [7]) deltas happened

we could see if comms are being established using the deltas, like the crumbs seem to indicate to me

the spread sheet would have:

dates of crumbs

dates of tweets

timestamp in h:m:s of crumbs

timestamp in h:m:s of tweets

then the ability to somehow know how many have [0], [1], [5], [10], and [15] (also the [6] and [7]) deltas IN MINUTES (because Q seems to indicate they are in minutes)

>>4854928

>https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vQMvZyhM5n1lf-ACCKErJTOA59mcVBrsaVkU3AkKYro/edit?usp=sharing

we need:

-one sheet for tweets (we need to remove dates and move the text of the tweets into adjacent cells - excelfags had a formula for this)

-another sheet for crumbs

-a combined sheet with crumbs in one column, tweets in another, sorted by timestamp (with the ability to link to the relevant cells in first 2 sheets). in the third column, we could merge cells and type in the delta between the first two columns?

i'm not sure this is the best way to sort/display the data, just throwing some ideas out there - there should be 2-3 excelfags in this thread including op

Resources

https://qanon.news/posts.html

http://trumptwitterarchive.com/archive

find a developer-codefag to extract then import into excel or wherever you decide.

https://qanon.news/feed

https://github.com/bpb27/trump_tweet_data_archive

>>4855244

I'm on it.

Gonna drop in here when it's ready

New url should be

https://qanon.news/deltas.html when I'm done

>>4855150

This is old

https://qanon.news/posts.html

https://qanon.news/Q is the new one.

codefag reporting for duty

>>4855313

Greeeeeetings codefag.

>>4855131

Yeah, you can have two separate sheets (tabs) in one doc, then link them how you said, and also create template/display sheets for ready-made graphics (macros).

>create template/display sheets for ready-made graphics (macros).

This is relevant to my interests. What can I do for you?

>>4855313

If you wanted to work something out as well this has all the data you need in json

https://qanon.news/api/smash

for xml

https://qanon.news/api/smash?xml=true

>>4855404

basically, we want to know all the times significant deltas occurred, and see if there are comms in those deltas

[0], [1], [5], [10], and [15] (also the [6] and [7]) deltas IN MINUTES

see: >>4854928, >>4855131

we're figuring out how to do that, but I really don't know how to personally

kek, seems anons do

>>4855536

Ok I've got something in the works but I'm just figuring out Javascript HTML and CSS. If you guys need something scripted or some data generated real quick let me know.

>>4855621

Ok I'll write something up for this.

>>4854665

>[RR-Out] is a marker, but not a delta marker

>DELTA markers are different than regular markers

ALL DELTA MARKERS ARE MARKERS, BUT NOT ALL MARKERS ARE DELTA MARKERS

I think this is a good example (OP pic and this pic)

so, 2 days before POTUS tweets about Ronald Reagan (double meaning of RR; used now as Rod Rosenstein) and Q says "marker missed?", Q posts "/[RR-out][P_pers]"

imo (just theorizing), this means Q dropped that crumb as a MARKER meaning POTUS would tweet (from his personal device) about RonaldReagan and the way they tried to take him out

and because anons didn't note it, Q asked if we missed the marker

So Q used markers for comms, AND delta markers for comms

this is a great example of this imo

>>4855779

and again, I've just been focusing on the [0], [1], [5], [10], and [15] (also the [6] and [7]) delta markers in minutes

it's unclear to me as of now how the other markers fit in

again, focusing on:

[0] = POTUS and Q are together

[1] = Message Confirming Q or Crumbs

[5] = Message Related to Crumbs

[10] = Delta Test with Message

[15] = Delta Test (comms test)

[1 year delta] = some events occur a year after Q informed anons about it, or are reoccurring yearly

AND

[6] = Device Delta Test

[7] = Word For Word Message

>>4855404

>What can I do for you?

Ty anon. I'm just giving my ideas here, I don't want it to sound like I'm ordering from a menu thinking you can just make appear whatever we want. I know we're all volunteers, whatever you want to do is appreciated.

We may need to develop the spreadsheets themselves moar to get specific enough for you to start on template/display macro's, and Anon's Marker theory is still developing, so I'm not sure what we'd want to display yet here but here's what I'm thinking:

Final product for template/display:

Essentially, Side-by-sides, Q proofs

Two choices of selective input:

A. Corroborating/identical data, selected sort field

1) Sorting the twat & drop sheets by date, minute, or keyword/person-of-interest etc. incl Anon's "Markers," (not delta's)

2) One sheet (either twats or drops) returns matches in same selected sort criteria from other sheet

3) User manually selects 2 or more twats/drops to be displayed on the side-by-side macro page

4) Macro displays both with the selected corroborating data highlighted in some way and arrows pointing to both connecting to a text box anon can enter brief explanation/narration

5) Text box up top for Anon to enter title

6) Ideally caps of the drops twats would be nice, but anons might have to manually enter those – unless we could eventually build a bank of those into the spreadsheets too.

B. Deltas in minutes btwn a twat and drop

1) Sorting the twat & drop sheets either by date/minute, or date/min AND keyword/person-of-interest etc. incl Anon's non-delta "Markers"

2) One sheet (either twats or drops) returns matches on the same day from other sheet

3) In additional column, delta in timestamp minutes is displayed

4) User manually selects 2 or more twats/drops to be displayed on the side-by-side macro page

5) Macro displays both with the timestamp minutes highlighted in some way and arrows pointing to both connecting to a display of the delta (text box where anon can enter brief explanation/narration needed?)

7) Text box up top for Anon to enter title

8) Ideally caps of the drops twats would be nice, but anons might have to manually enter those – unless we could eventually build a bank of those into the spreadsheets too.

>>4855837

ok it may not be a delta marker but how do you define "regular marker"?

because either way, Q said it had to do with the timestamps of both the tweet and the crumb/drop

and that the clock is wound with all markers, including this one, so the logical conclusion would be there is a correlation between the timestamp of the tweet and the timestamp of the crumb (which is basically what we look at for delta markers)

>>4855837 i agree these confirmed markers are probably most significant and where we should focus first. looking at other possible deltas in more of an exploratory way imo

>>4855932

just thinking of combos:

• tweet and tweet

• tweet and retweet

• retweet and retweet

• crumb and crumb

• crumb and tweet

• crumb and retweet

but check what this anon is doing: >>4591252 ("timestamp decode thread")

I think that anon has a database for POTUS tweets

not sure what those "delta shifts" are though

have yall seen this one? Has a lot of the stamps on it already.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OqTR0hPipmL9NE4u_JAzBiWXov3YYOIZIw6nPe3t4wo/edit#gid=1919753853

>>4855995

so this is what I've been assuming are "markers" (pic)

essentially [x] is a marker

so some "regular markers" are numbers, words, phrases, etc; but the delta markers are specifically numbers

>>4856027

hmmmm

that seems to have basically what we're looking for

but for the [15] and [10] markers that Q confirmed, they're not shown

[15] on 11/4/17

[10] on 12/23/17

>>4856027

perfect, we may not have to reinvent the wheel

>>4856074 gotcha and sorry to be so annoying about this, also past my bedtime, but i think it's safe to say imo that either way, even the delta markers are less about the numbers themselves and more about what they signify on the clock/map, i.e. comms? the numbers point to the comms

so these regular markers are like one step closer in that they are more direct comms - at least that's how i see it

i also always assumed that the timestamp of the post with the marker was the marker as well but i'm seeing now i might be wrong about that, idk

>>4855932

If the code is freely available would Anons run a local utility? I have code that monitors for Q posts, I could write code that scrapes DJT's twitter as well. I'm looking at network graph frontends and currently working with one for a personal tool but I'd be willing to put something together if Anons aren't adverse to running their own local 'Q Utility'.

This is what I'm currently using for frontend js.cytoscape.org/

>>4856152

>even the delta markers are less about the numbers themselves and more about what they signify on the clock/map, i.e. comms?

true, but as I've said, I think each confirmed delta has a specific comm/meaning to it

the [0] delta is the most obvious one because it shows Q and POTUS are together, but for example the [1], [5], [10], and [15] deltas are not as intuitive, but I think they have specific meanings

>the numbers point to the comms so these regular markers are like one step closer in that they are more direct comms - at least that's how i see it

as for the other, non-delta markers, I agree with you

we'd need to look into tweets after those markers, but they could be comms or hints of what's being tweeted

like the 'missing marker' one: >>4855779

>i also always assumed that the timestamp of the post with the marker was the marker as well but i'm seeing now i might be wrong about that, idk

these are all just theories until Q confirms imo

>>4856105

If you look at the tab titled "tweet delta match" the 11-4-17 marker is in the [15] column not color coded but you are correct i don't see the 12-23-17 [10] marker. We are talking Q post timestamp compared to DJT tweet time? Just making sure.

>>4856012

Re: your combo ideas for subject-content corroboration, definitely all those. Even for having corroborating/identical timestamp minutes in common even if different dates, could be intentional comms there too.

For delta's (and Anon's Marker Theory delta-markers), my initial understanding was they were the difference in timestamp minutes between a Q drop and a POTUS twat, or a twat and retwat, made within an hour of each other (bc Q clock).

However…

If we have a systematic way of sorting this stuff, we could also look for additional codes, as per this link you gave me >>4591252

I believe by "delta shifts" this anon is suggesting adding the data points of a) deltas between POTUS twats within the same day and b) "time between each tweet and first tweet of the day" (see pic)

>>4855779

AB, what do you think of that?

I'm going to post over there on timestamp thread to let 'em know what we're doing over here (and apologizing for duplicating effort, didn't realize when I made this thread they had that going already)

>>4856249

>We are talking Q post timestamp compared to DJT tweet time?

yes, for these three deltas it's crumb vs tweet:

these are the dates and timestamps of the crumb (in the 2nd post's graphic)

[5]: 12/23/17 ; 15:22:21 EST

[10]: 12/12/17 ; 17:03:32 EST

[15]: 11/4/17 ; 19:28:58 EST

and the pics are what I'm finding in the spread sheet (pic1 is 15, pic2 is 10, pic3 is 5)

>>4856370

just noticed I think they're in CST too

>>4856297

understood and I think that's a good idea

essentially, it'd be great if we could know how many 15, 10, 5, 1, and 0 deltas there have been between all those combos

then we could see if there is any pattern in those deltas (which Q confirmed to be significant)

my graphic here: >>4854731 show each delta, and the context in which Q used them is why I think the specific deltas have a comm (meaning)

>>4856249

>>4856370

wait, I'm not sure which one I was in, but this one has all the deltas by the minute delta they were

the 11/4 [15] delta is there; but the 12/12 [10] delta and the 12/23 [5] delta are not

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OqTR0hPipmL9NE4u_JAzBiWXov3YYOIZIw6nPe3t4wo/edit#gid=1799018260

I'm not even sure what these "deltas" are

but the data might be useful for the codefags

>>4856580

kek, in reference to these sheets:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OqTR0hPipmL9NE4u_JAzBiWXov3YYOIZIw6nPe3t4wo/edit#gid=1064245675

>>4856530

yes, sorry… I think we have the Q timestamp data but im questioning the DJT timestamps on the spreadsheet. Sorry for the mixup.

Found this on trumptwitterarchive.com ; not sure if useful:

https://github.com/bpb27/trump_tweet_data_archive

https://github.com/bpb27/political_twitter_archive

https://github.com/bpb27/twitter_scraping

http://trumptwitterarchive.com/howto/all_tweets.html

>>4856604

all good, still working this stuff out

>>4856159

>If the code is freely available would Anons run a local utility?

I'm not nearly sophisticated enough in computer stuff to know whether this kind of thing would be safe for me to do tbh. While I know quite a lot about excel and a couple other utilities, that's about it. But

>code that scrapes DJT's twitter

to update the spreadsheet at regular intervals would be helpful I imagine

But also may be redundant to some extent given this:

>>4856027

I'm still checking it out

>>4856588

>I'm not even sure what these "deltas" are

You and me both. You can't have a "delta" (difference) unless it's between two things. Not really the kind of data point you just have linked to a single timestamp, which is how it looks to me.

>>4856580

kek

>I'm not even sure what these "deltas" are

is begging to be memed

>>4856713

http://www.trumptwitterarchive.com/archive

The Q timestamps on the google spreadsheet are off by one hour. Probably Timezone.

DJT tweet (pic related) at 19:43 [15] from Q post #74

>>4856795

exactly

>>4856834

I clarified it, you nigger

>>4856865

see the bottom part of the graphic (15 part): >>4854731

all in EST

>>4856834

>>4856834

>>4856074

Apparently markers can come in multiple forms. Here the WH video matches Q post 1440 by saying Dark to Light at the 1:07 mark.

No. 100 -→ this may mean it is Marker number 100?

>>4856983

Kek, our first meme!

Our little thread has arrived.

>>4857314

exactly

though imo the marker in that pic is in that vid (at (1:07 in the video, it literally shows dark to light)

but on the several types of markers, pic2 is an great example

so the [:22], [:27], [5], and [10] have to do with the delta markers

but [#2] is a reoccurring marker meaning McCabe (#2 at the FBI)

>>4857361

No. 100 refers to /greatawakening/ post #100

I was looking at qmap which has different numbering. Damn, this is going to be a ton of work.

Somehow it has to lead us to the MAP or a countdown.

>>4857361

Marker? WH clean SIG

>>4857540

sorry forgot Q post

>>4857546

>>4857540

haven't thought about that one

good connection though

>>4857480

>No. 100 refers to /greatawakening/ post #100

true, and I use qanon.pub because has the active links to the post numbers

but that's a good point, I do think the map and the clock are related somehow, likely by the markers

(made this, it's the "markers" before the post where Q says to wind the clock w/ all markers)

and marker (imo) = [something]

I'll have that .csv file available shortly, I was just thinking about some things while this happened that relate to the markers.

Do you remember when the shills kvetched about the one [0] delta being six seconds off or whatever it is? Q said it was a 0 marker, therefore the proper marker is minutes.

I have all the time in the world to codefag what you guys need.

Here's my first pass at what I think yall are looking for.

https://qanon.news/deltas.html

I left the negative deltas in because it has seemed to me that some data is relevant in there + it helps to account for lag in posting times. I can remove or reduce that if needed.

It's currently highlighting in red any delta that is mod 5, that is, any delta that is divisible by 5, so … [-15] [-10] [-5] [0] [5] [10] [15]…

Some of the Kanji that POTUS dropped in the tweets was screwing up my character count. I'll see if I can come up with a fix for that, but that's why the formatting looks weird in those posts.

I'm not showing any posts/rows where there is no delta (POTUS tweet) within the hour. I'll check back in later.

Here's the CSV file sorted by timestamp https://file.io/QOgiYg

If you want it another way let me know it's simple to change things. All the timestamps are in UTC, timestamps are 'Unix Time' so it's easy to find a 1 delta by calculating +-60 seconds.

>>4861997

You want to team up? I'm looking at making something that allows Anons to do more analysis on their own machines. Your site is nice though and I can see why you wouldn't want to if you didn't want to.

>>4862388

Ya man - what are you thinking?

>>4861997

QQQQQQQQQQQQQ,

Whats up? Geezzzz, say something, we are getting creamed by the Marxist Dimms screaming about the shutdown. We are loosing minds to this emotional crap. Why don't you and POTUS tell the truth to the American people about our border? About who is really behind it…… the hell with hurt feelings. TELL THEM!

>>4861997

>>4862397

am I reading this right?

those are [5] and [0] deltas?

>>4861997

>>4862397

>>4863209

and this was something I was mentioning

this looks like a [0] delta because of the minute timestamp, but in reality it's essentially one hour apart

>>4862397

I think Anons need the ability to create complex infographics and share complex ideas. I think network graphs are the way to go because of the arbitrary nature of nodes and edges. Q Posts should be addressable by line and each line or even word should be able to be made a node. Nodes should also be able to have pictures which can have nodes on them if Anon wants to point out a specific part of a picture.

Basic Requirements

>Everything should be able to be hosted/ran local for Anons

For Performance and Archival Reasons, also not being tied into a service means people can still be Anons

>Ability to run computationally intensive tasks outside of the frontend

Use websockets to queue these up from the frontend and report results. AMQP comes to mind here. Backend waits for a crafted message, and executes whatever function. This allows other Anons to program their own modules and still have a unified frontend for sharing. (For example Video Rendering, graph initialization, anything that shouldn't be done in the browser)

>Graphs should be importable and exportable so they can be shared

Options to include an archive of the source images or the source links should exist

>Graphs should be mergeable

We should decide on a flexible convention that addresses Anons needs in the future.

Tools that should be available on the frontend should be

>Allow Anons to add nodes and edges

>Nodes should be able to be pictures, text or raw html

>Edges should also be able to have pictures, text or raw html

>Allow access to whichever network graph framework's query/selector api

Other Features (network things)

>8ch Viewer/Archiver

>Q Post Alerts

>Add arbitrary twitter accounts to scrape

I've looked at some frontend API's like cytoscape and d3. cytoscape has significant advantages when it comes to interaction so I leaned more towards that. What I've just described is what I'm currently working on but I'm learning js/css/html as I'm going so it's going but it's going slow. I have some parts of my proposed backend completed already.

I think putting tools like these in Anons hands would be a great idea, even better if it's actually free as in freedom and beer.

>>4863570

if you're talking about the map (which I'm also interested in pursuing), check out what QMAP has:

https://qmap.pub/analytics/network

it'd be great to make something like it, but a stand alone graphic that doesn't need to be searched to use

>>4863652

That's exactly what I'm working on. I just want something Anons can run on their own machines and autistically browse whatever data they're interested in.

One part is for monitoring things Anons are interested in like 8ch, twitter and whatever else you can think of

The other part is for making infographics and sharing complex ideas

The code for both overlaps pretty much completely so if you have one you basically have both codewise.

>>4863209

Nearly!

#2665 is a NEGATIVE [-5] delta in minutes…

#2664 is a [0]. Q posted 7 seconds before POTUS

>>4863235

Yes I agree. I'll have to look into why that's happening. I thought that I'd fixed that - but maybe I went back. It was set up where I was looking at 30 minutes on either side of a Q post. either way I'll check that out.

>>4863570

>I think Anons need the ability to create complex infographics and share complex ideas.

Yes. It sounds like we've been thinking about many of the same things. I've been playing around with d3.js. I've been trying to get the time to put something like this together

http://mbostock.github.io/d3/talk/20111116/force-collapsible.html

Sounds like a breddy big project! I can do some of the js/css/html if ya need it.

That network map on qmap wasn't working for me.

>>4863235

Yeah I found this issue and have it fixed. I had left a 61 minute range in where I was testing it. I changed the range to 60 and it looks to be working as designed now. I'll do an update - likely to kill off the site for a couple minutes unfortunately.

>>4863895

ok, so:

a negative delta = POTUS inb4 Q

a positive delta = Q inb4 POTUS

that right?

>>4864080

understood, sounds good

>>4864086

5:5

THERE HAVE BEEN TWO THINGS I'VE BEEN THINKING ABOUT RECENTLY:

The Map

I envision the map being a "Mind Map" or "spider map" that has all the connections between people, organizations, agencies, markers etc

(see the pic)

this is what QMap.pub has been working on

what would be ideal is a stand alone, interactive graphic with all the connections Q has informed us about

The Clock

then the clock is basically this delta stuff

essentially the [#] delta has a specific comm associated with it, a "stopwatch" like metaphor where deltas are observed and analyzed to see if there is a pattern of comms

I'm not a codefag, so I have no clue how to go about doing this, but I think this is what Q wants by The Map and The Clock

>>4864098

that's actually a good feature, can easily show who was first

because in my graphic, most are Q inb4 POTUS

the [0] delta is due to the lag/processing like Q said, but there have been [0] deltas where Q is first

Hi guys,

Aus Anon from other thread checking in .. Just seeking some clarification

So you are looking at when significant deltas 1, 5, 10, 15 between tweets and Q drops occurred .. and then winding the clock forward, if I am getting it right?

Just have one concern - I know that it has been mentioned that other significant Tweets may also be used, not just POTUS - so in this case, DOD etc would need to be added also or you may miss a winding? Or are you solely looking at time markers in the Q drops ?

I think that the data is multi leveled … I have been looking at the significance of the tweet time stamps and how they may be used to communicate with us. There is definitely something to it, I have found some spoopiness in there at times (the best one being give an inch take a mile - being that one time the data was 2 54 = 1 inch in cm. I then remembered that saying and converted a mile to cm, subtracted it from the initial code .. and it led to me to a series of stringers .. Was a very wierd experience to say the least, wasn't sure if I should be posting that finding on a public board.

Of last I have been getting swamped with it all, but I try to document POTUS tweets every day and roughly analyse to keep an eye for any trends that may be forming. Normally there are lots of markers 911, 23, 45, 55, 1111 evident in the data at times where they want you looking into things deeper.

If you have any questions, feel free to drop them for me either here or in the Tweet Decode bread \

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/4557354.html

Best of luck.

>>4864170

>and then winding the clock forward, if I am getting it right?

imo, the "wind the clock" stuff is metaphorical

on old stopwatches, you would literally wind it back to the 0 positions

and in this metaphor, after a crumb or a tweet, you'd metaphorical reset the stopwatch to look for another delta if no delta came

if one did, you'd metaphorically reset it or rewind after recording the delta

as for the other tweets besides POTUS', not sure if that's legit because Q has never mentioned deltas with other people's tweets, just POTUS'

I'm just basing all my theoretical thinking off of crumbs

>>4864214

This.

[Markers] reset the clock as in post timestamps, then compare with twat deltas.

Another marker, another reset.

Rinse and repeat.

I can see it in my head but articulating it is a little difficult.

I like where this thread is going.

This is connecting a lot of dots I saw early on in /QR/ that since were sidetracked due to muh nooooozzzzz.

Is there a working read-only file to monitor progress?

Giggle-drive?

>>4865749

thanks anon

this is going back to the fundamentals of Q, deltas, markers, timestamps, the clock, the map, etc

but this is looking great:

https://qanon.news/deltas.html

it's got the deltas between crumbs and tweets

these are EXACT deltas, and some of them Q wants use to look at the minutes it seems

so something that's 14:20 (m:s) or something could be a [15] delta if the minutes line up

anons are working on other shit too

just theorizing and formalizing things, this thread is for both the deltas and the map, two projects worth thinking about

Well done anons. I like what’s going on at https://qanon.news/deltas.html

Color me impressed. This was a really quick turn around from concept to reality.

>>4855313

Count me in too

Gonna read the whole thing and see what you guys came up with

I've got some ideas of my own

>>4866188

>>4866129

imagine this for what I mean as a "delta counter"

when a crumb or a tweet is posted, you "start the clock"

if another is posted, you count the delta then record it, and after you'd "rewind the clock" back to it's 0 positions

if another isn't posted, you "rewind the clock" back to it's 0 positions anyway

all metaphorically

>>4866213

put that line there to make it a Q because I'm a fag

>>4866220

>>4866213

>>4866220

You may be a fag .. but it looks good nonetheless .. kek

>>4866213

>>4866253

>>4866328

added a "number window" so you can put the # of mins/secs and a place to put the delta

this "graphic" is basically unneeded, but just a way to visualize it

>>4854731

>>4866505

>>4863895

>>4863570

>>4861997

wow you guys have done an incredible job so far

and to think i was going to just copy and paste all the data into an excel file and do everything MANUALLY kek

not much i can do now that the codefags have it handled but i look forward to using the tool once it's done. thank you all again. this thread is /qresearch/ at its best

>>4867207

>do everything MANUALLY

that's exactly what I would've done

KEK

thank god for codefags, I'm just theorizing and making graphics

>>4864098

just a request, not sure how plausible it is

would it be possible to NOT show the seconds for the [1], [5], [10], and [15], meaning only show the difference between the minute timestamp, then SHOW the seconds for the [0] deltas?

can rephrase if needed

>>4867207

lol thats how i did it for the timestamp decodes for his tweets … setup a good old fashioned spreadsheet with forumlas … got it down to entering time in one cell for each new tweet .. works a treat still

>>4863570

Look at Visallo. It's free and is what I was thinking about to do the same thing.

>>4854731

updating a part of the theory's notes

>a delta can be between a crumb and a tweet/retweet, between tweets/retweets, or between crumbs and crumbs

it doesn't seem like the deltas other than the [15] would be relevant for anything BUT crumb-(re)tweet comms

>>4869371

fuck meant the [0] delta

the [0] delta is only relevant for crumb-(re)tweets

the other deltas can be relevant for the other combos

>>4854731

Got your thinking cap on anon. I like it. However, with the exception of your point on [7] & [5], may I note that boiling down all your other categories leads to nothing more than "Trust Q" or "test".

Do you really think "test" or "omg trust q" is meaningful?

IMO you all should look into whether there is a mechanism of making sense of these often meaningless "crumbs". For instance, linking them to the real calendar somehow, or at least to each other, and then finally to the real calendar. If there is some kind of sophisticated coding going on here, there's no way it boils down to "trust" and "test". You feelin' me anon?

>>4869475

look at both the [5] and [7] for examples since you mentioned them

BOTH, Q was before POTUS

in the [5], same exact topic, it the [7], legitimately word for word

that's why I don't think this has anything to do with "Trust Q", especially because Q was before POTUS in every delta in that graphic except the [0]'s (but it's do to the differing lag)

didn't put this one in due to space, but this is a [0] delta where Q is inb4 POTUS

and on that [15] then [1], Q used the win/when this to allude to a tweet about goodwin, in which POTUS had the Q misspelling

but on your last paragraph, that's what we're trying to do

we're trying to see if seemingly random crumbs that are hard to understand have a delta, and if that delta indicates something about a connection to the crumb and the tweet

but of course, this is just a theory, in its early stages too

>>4869542

and the meanings of the deltas are JUST THEORIES

maybe they have different significances when it comes to comms

except the [0] and [1 year], they're kind of self explanatory imo

using https://qanon.news/deltas.html , if my theory is right, Q was with POTUS when they posted the tweet and crumb

Q inb4 POTUS

and the 7 second delta is one of the closest when Q is inb4 POTUS, besides a 6 second delta last year

just trying to formalize the theories, still a work in progress

>>4869712

I wouldnt count on that … I have seen POTUS push two tweets at the same time .,. down to the second (more than once), so presumably they are set up and scheduled beforehand, then roll out at the time comes.

>>4870383

Remember they are using the tweets as comms .. so they arent going to leave it to chance re posting time.

>>4870383

>>4870390

that's why I'm refining the theory

I'm not sure if every delta applies to every combo of tweet, retweet, and crumb

for example, the 0 delta is ONLY for crumb-(re)tweet

still working on it and finding other examples

>>4870383

oh, and that's a delta between Q and POTUS, not POTUS and POTUS

>>4870480

I realised that … my point was only that I doubt POTUS needs to be in that same room as Q or Q team members, they just have to schedule their tweets to be posted together.

I used the example that POTUS tweet to tweet deltas has been 0 secs on several occasions, just to shows that they probably arent typing them on a phone and hitting send.

>>4870613

true, but if that were the case, they'd do it all the time and the deltas are rare

but theoretically, let's say they do time them, those posts that make the deltas would have a heightened significance imo

LOVE to see Anons going back to "square one" basics. Just discovered this thread and I see really great minds here.

Have been pouring over all posts re the MAP and GRAPHIC. Q's post #128 seems very crucial as a moment in time that Q has taken to try to explain how to read THE MAP.

Just an idea, but as every map has a "Key" which tells us how to read it(ie scale, symbols, markers)could Q be telling us look for the key in this posting of the graphic? Why does Q say a "picture is provided"? There is only one picture provided in the graphic shown. Did anons get any hidden data from the picture in question? Was thinking there might be a mathematical sequence embedded in the picture data. Think there may be a KEY or LEGEND in this drop. Is it in the picture "provided"?

Q says a guide to reading crumbs is necessary (AT THIS POINT- my interjection)to continue.

Following is a portion of Post#128:

Guide to reading the crumbs necessary to cont[I]nue.

Attached gr[A]phic is correct.

Linked graphics are incorrect and false.

Graphic is necessary and vital.

Time stamp(s) and order [is] critical.

Re-review graphic (in full) each day post news release.

Learn to distinguish between relevant/non-relevant news.

Disinformation is real.

Disinformation is necessary.

Ex: US ML NG (1) False SA True

Why was this necessary?

What questions were asked re: SA prior to SA events?

Why is this relevant?

Think mirror.

Look there, or [here], or there, truth is behind you.

What is a map?

Why is a map useful?

What is a legend?

Why is a legend useful?

What is a sequence?

Why is this relevant?

When does a map become a guide?

What is a keystone?

Everything stated is relevant.

Everything.

Future provides past.

Map provides picture.

Picture provides 40,000ft. v.

40,000ft. v. is classified.

Why is a map useful?

Think direction.

Think full picture.(Where I ended the Q post quote)

Why did Q mention the Picture?

It was from a past drop.

Why did Q say it provided a 40,000ft v(iew)? And say that the 40,000ft v(iew) is classified?

Q also wants us to think DIRECTION. Was there any embedded info in the pic that addressed ORIENTATION of the camera when pic was taken?

Isn't a Compass part of the legend of a map? (pic provided)

Am just a phone fag autist and you guys are gods when it comes to computers and codes. When I listen to you speak amongst yourselves, I know this thread is going to produce great things.

>>4871083

"Future provides past.

Map provides picture."

Did anyone notice how Q did not say, "Future proves past" here but, rather says, "Future PROVIDES past"? Was Q drawing our attenion to the next use of the word "provides"?

Was Q putting a subliminal thought in our mind, as we read the first sentence to tell ourselves, where he wrote "provides", he should have written "proves"?

And then maybe when we went to read the next line we would be saying to ouselves, "MAP PROVES PICTURE"?

Like a mathematical PROOF?

Did you see this?

Some anon is proposing the clock starts on sundays.

Question is when do we need to wind it?

>>4867280

Yean anon, I can work that out. Gotta do some RL work, but it shouldn't take to long.

EX:

[00:07] = [00:07]

[01:10] = [01]

[05:45] = [05]

Anything else while I'm in there?

>>4873068

Anon, can you add a filter by day [SMTWTFS]?

if >>4872825 is correct the clock starts on sundays (12)

With each marker we need to wind the clock (back to 12)

I think this could mean each marker begins @ 12, so each has it's own timeline

I'm not sure how to position each crumb on the timeline yet

I did a quick drawing to hopefully give an idea of what I mean

>>4873684

>Anon, can you add a filter by day [SMTWTFS]?

Like as a dropdown?

>>4874452

Dropdown should work especially if it can be in AND with other filters.

If this leads somewhere we might need a checkbox group to enable/disable days but probably overkill for now.

>>4874452

While you're at it, please consider pic related.

Afaik no tool does this currently.

Let's say I search a post # (but should work when filtering by other means imo, pic 2 related), some simple way to see the context of the post chronologically.

>>4873068

exactly that

and eventually be able to filter for a specific delta (showing all deltas of that #)

but no rush, just got back on

>>4872825

it would be interesting if there was a day of the week aspect to these comms

>>4875791

agree

testing mic check 1,2.freddyisapussy check check ..can yaw herme ?

I’ve been thinking about the clock and markers. I know this is out there…but what if the clock resets based on moon phases?

Re: Sky event

Re: Watch the water

>>4878014

that's a cool theory

work on it

the anon above was working on the Jefferson's Great Clock theory for a little and found a pattern too

anons are also working on map theories in addition to clock theories in this thread

inadvertent bump

some thoughts on the delta theory

re: the meaning of [0] specifically but just an example

>Q and POTUS are together

that’s kind of obvious isn’t it? if they posted at the same time, the obvious conclusion would be that they are together and/or coordinated hitting send simultaneously. what can we do with that information? everything is stated for a specific reason and this doesn’t fit that imo. Q specifically stated that the importance of the timestamps goes beyond establishing Q’s legitimacy/AUTH

all of the deltas should have some deeper/more actionable meaning. hopefully once anons have the bigger picture/map we will be able to analyze Q’s comms in the context of the drop/tweet/time they were posted and then develop theories from there

who knows, maybe these deltas also point to the future in some way — for example a [5] delta means the tweets/posts will be relevant in 5 days/weeks/months etc.

>>4878961

this is not to shit on the theory

anon should be commended for being the first to actually ask what do the deltas mean? which is a huge breakthrough

up until now we’ve just been pointing them out and basically dropping it

either all of us are overthinking or this is a huge opportunity to crack Q’s code

>>4879088

>>4878961

well, it is obvious, but the [0] (being together) and [1 year] (happening yearly or occurring one year after Q posted about it) are the most obvious

the harder ones to know the significances of are the [1], [5], [10], and [15] deltas

>>4879088

but EXACTLY

I'm just looking at the deltas Q confirmed, and seeing if there is a meaning to the deltas, which are in the 2nd post of this thread

it's just a theory

and once we have EVERY delta listed, we can look each [0], [1], [5] etc delta and find a pattern or meaning

>for example a [5] delta means the tweets/posts will be relevant in 5 days/weeks/months etc.

look into it, a lot of things are plausible imo

my theory was ORIGINALLY just going to be a graphic showing the [15], [10], [5], and [1] delta that culminated on 1/7/18 with a foreshadowing of the [0] delta

but thought their could be a specific comm associated with the specific delta

>>4861997

Anon, did you know that's clam baker's old avatar?

>>4881029

Clambaker? Not me. I just liked the clam.

>>4875610

Still working on this.

>>4875791

I like this idea alot and will def try to get this done.

>>4873068

Going to try and do a 'hide delta seconds' checkbox I think.

I remembered that there is a gap in the TrumpTwitterArchive where there were a couple markers, a [5] and a [10] as I recall. 1-1-2018 - 1-9-2018 the TrumpTwitterArchive wasn't working. I have a shiny new TwitterAPI key I'm going to play around with to see if I can do something about it unless anybody else has a great idea.

>>4881289

>Clambaker? Not me. I just liked the clam.

Got it, thanks anon. Just didn't want anons to get confused. Meme didn't start as an avatar anyway. Came about on a day when someone made clam/calm typo and a rain of memed puns ensued.

>>4881289

> I have a shiny new TwitterAPI key

I am jelly af, I could not get one.

Get @POTUS_Schedule and DJT's twitter along with Melania.

>>4881289

use this as an example

this is in fact a [15] delta, if you only count it buy the minute timestamp

>>4881525

trust the clam

This looks like a great idea. I’ve wondered about a searchable, sortable spreadsheet with the dates and CAPITALIZATION from DJT tweets and Q posts and see if we can identify any additional messaging patterns, both by how they relate to each other in real-time, but also how the capital letters may relate to each other year over year, and/or around the Q clock….

If the delta spreadsheet is being compiled and coded, is this something that would be useful for an additional tab?

>>4881584

*by

inb4 grammar nazis

>>4881584

Have I been doing these wrong all along? Should I only be doing math on the minutes not the actual time deltas?

>>4881859

no, you've been doing them right, especially for the 0 deltas, that's awesome to see all of them and the exact delta

but if possible, it'd be nice to see just the pure minute deltas between the [15], [10], [5], and [1] deltas

that one as an example:

28 → 43 is [15]

but 28:58 → 43:08 is 14:10

only if possible

>>4881859

>>4881969

this is a MUCH better example

Q CONFIRMED this as a [10] delta

03:32 → 13:12 = 09:40

BUT Q IS ONLY REFERENCING THE MINUTES

3 → 13 = [10]

Whomever can work in tableau, we need a relationship to be +/-5, +/10, +/-15 between Q post and POTUS tweets of minutes only.

Here's my theory:

timestamp>delta 5,10,15clock

delta 0,1>marker>news>map

>>4882309

Shit wrong graphic sorry

>>4882338

Using that I have the following:

5: 232,303,447

10: 334:447:451

15: 310,451 and something with 492/497 where POTUS made correction for a 1 min delta on 10:23:39

Most all of Q initial instructions for reading these is on 12/23/17 following this Q mentions the first [15]marker and a speech in post 502. That refers back to the Civial RIghts speech he gave not the one in Pensacola, both mention justice. My thinking is that if we use Q's instructions of [5] present, [10] past and [15] longer past then the farthest marker is JFK, that's when the clock begins.

>>4881584

>>4855995

In my brief work on this, I've got the directions graphic based on my theory, however what I found is that markers have to do with video's.

==UPDATED THE PICS TO JUST SHOW MINUTES (still have the ones with seconds too)

>>4882520

I'm assuming that's for the 'trust the clam' and not the talk of deltas

>>4882621

markers have to do with videos?? are you referring to the post with 1:07?

would love to hear more

>>4882635 kek see current general bread title

>>4882701

> the post with 1:07?

(pic)

and kek, I see the title

it's a plausible and simple theory

all based off crumbs and Q's usage of the deltas for what seem like comms

>>4882738

>it's a plausible and simple theory all based off crumbs and Q's usage of the deltas for what seem like comms

kek i know.. i am all for the deltas. i baked current bread and gave it a shout out.. and your theory is what inspired me to attempt to sort the drops and tweets in order of timestamp until excelfags came to my rescue and then codefags came to their rescue and here we are now all happily deltafagging away

>>4882872

oops did not mean to spoil that

Updated the graphic to only have the minute marker

>>4882872

thanks for the shoutout

but also mapfagging, excelfagging, "clock"fagging, and deltafagging

kek

>>4881859

actually anon, I think it ALL should be in JUST minutes

but keep the timestamps so if desired, an anon can see how many seconds a [0] delta was off by

updated

still no theory on the [2] delta

>>4883175

unclear wording

the delta markers were confirmed, not the theories

except the [1 year]) is kind of self explanatory, so is the [0] imo

>>4882738

This is way deep into Q. Q was giving the instructions in Dec.

So some instructions about deltas, markers do not contain either themselves but are about how to find thing and where to place them. For instance:

And then you have these .22 .27 ref which is Comey and HRC at those markers in link provided in 446.

Then we have post 502 which refers to the first 15, which is 310 which refers to a speech. He gave two, one at the Civil Rights Memorial and one in Pensacola, both mention justice and military. https://youtu.be/vCooZF4XKKk this makes more sense as a marker than the Pensacola speech, that is used in a different lesson.

>>4883234

see: >>4883012

the left side (read from bottom to top)

>>4883369

this may be very garbled but:

So before 12/09 Q does not mention timestamp but on that day he does so why look for a 15 delta prior to that date? Post 310 is a 15 delta to this tweet Dec 9, 2017 01:19:31 PM It was my great honor to celebrate the opening of two extraordinary museums-the Mississippi State History Museum & the Mississippi Civil Rights Museum. We pay solemn tribute to our heroes of the past & dedicate ourselves to building a future of freedom, equality, justice & peace. https://t.co/5AkgVpV8aa [Twitter for iPhone]

But it's not id'd until after the fact when Q points us back to it as the first 15.

So first instruction, first 15, same day.

497 & Trump tweet win/Goodwin, yep

and there was some redundancy, like Q was trying to make sure anons had the understanding of the deltas.

10 min delta yep 334 also 447,451 against POTUS Baker tweet

5 min

232 small business

303

Q

!ITPb.qbhqo

8 Dec 2017 - 11:01:30 AM

Renee J James

Q

Dec 8, 2017 10:06:55 AM LAST thing the Make America Great Again Agenda needs is a Liberal Democrat in Senate where we have so little margin for victory already. The Pelosi/Schumer Puppet Jones would vote against us 100% of the time. He’s bad on Crime, Life, Border, Vets, Guns & Military. VOTE ROY MOORE! [Twitter for iPhone]

447 (sames as yours)

and another 15 with

451 451

Q

!UW.yye1fxo

23 Dec 2017 - 3:42:56 PM

Who is meeting in secret right now?

WE SEE YOU!

WE HEAR YOU!

YOU EVIL SICK BASTARDS ARE STUPID!!!

Q

Dec 23, 2017 03:27:05 PM How can FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, the man in charge, along with leakin’ James Comey, of the Phony Hillary Clinton investigation (including her 33,000 illegally deleted emails) be given $700,000 for wife’s campaign by Clinton Puppets during investigation? [Twitter for iPhone]

497 Doesn't have a delta but shows how to find the deltas between POTUS tweet and Q post and to find the 15.

[15] Jan 7, 2018 10:24:23 PM …Clinton in the WH, doubling down on Barack Obama’s failed policies, washes away any doubts that America made the right choice. This was truly a change election — and the changes Trump is bringing are far-reaching & necessary.” Thank you Michael Goodwin! https://t.co/4fHNcx2Ydg [Twitter for iPhone]

Jan 7, 2018 10:23:39 PM “His is turning out to be an enormously consequential presidency. So much so that, despite my own frustration over his missteps, there has never been a day when I wished Hillary Clinton were president. Not one. Indeed, as Trump’s accomplishments accumulate, the mere thought of… [Twitter for iPhone]

498

Q

!UW.yye1fxo

7 Jan 2018 - 10:09:13 PM

LOCK: 15-10-5

DEFCON [1]

[1] SIG

Q

Then we get to the 502 which I think points to that cival rights speech, Q ask about w/Q, wo/Q.

JFK did not have Q, POTUS does which is why I believe jfk is the first marker.

I started working on graphics but been laid up with an abcessed tooth.

Also DEFCON is not defense condition, Q tells us that specifically but I think it may have to do with the hacker convention and likely a video for yet another marker.

This maybe DEFON 1, another marker

1999

On July 10, 1999, the Cult of the Dead Cow hacker collective released Back Orifice 2000 at DEF CON 7, in what was, at the time, the largest presentation in DEF CON history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back_Orifice_2000

There is also a correlation to Las Vegas and War Games

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DEF_CON

If I'm shitting up your bread let me know.

>>4884620

>If I'm shitting up your bread let me know.

no, you're not

all theories are just as plausible until they're discussed moar

but I'm baking (there seems to be a lot of bakers in this thread) right now, so I'll look at your post likely in the morning

it's a long one, just saw it and want to see what you're getting at

and besides, it keeps it bumped

>>4883019

5:5

Gonna add another column so we'll have [delta] and [timediff]. [Delta is just the math on minutes. timediff is the time different in {mm:ss} between the 2 drops.

>>4883234

I have a couple of graphics for these but can't access them right now.

For #417, find post that contains "CAP_H(9)" and subsequent post with "22_WH_POTUS_PRESS"

First is :02

Second is :20

Equals 22(=2+20) (learn?)

DIVERT_ATT = 9 chars

Just for keks:

• CAP_H could be CAPITOL HILL (mulitple meanings)

• For some time I wondered if CAP_H(9) could mean H=9 (matches D=5) but lead me nowhere so far.

For #502, refers to good[win]/[when]

15 delta was between 2 POTUS tweets (consensual typo)

Same for the delta 1 (consensual -consequential)

These were both Q lessons to teach us.

>>4886185

I agree with everyone who says delta are calculated by minutes only

Also hours don't matter as an absolute value (just need to be same timezone for a correct timeline)

>>4886185

>>4882069

OK I think I have this sorted out now. I required some backend changes so I'm running a small update.

Here is what changed: The Delta column now shows the math on minutes only. Hover this value to see the exact timespan difference.

>>4873684

Also incorporated the dayfilter drop down where you can filter all the Qdrops with deltas by a day of the week. IE: [Sunday], [Tuesday]… Selecting [NotSet] will reset to no filter.

Thanks for the help in working out this delta issue everybody.

>>4889787

>>4886185

that looks fucking great, exactly what I was meaning

thank you, I'll start looking through it in detail

>>4887615

>I agree with everyone who says delta are calculated by minutes only

Q has confirmed this too

but what you're saying above is what I was seeing to

Q has been literally teaching us how to read the deltas AND the stringers too

>>4889838

Check #2664

>Sometimes making a connection leads to uncovering ……

[0] {00:07}

[-7] {07:27} https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1082268365081767936

>….The Fake News Media in our Country is the real Opposition Party. It is truly the Enemy of the People! We must bring honesty back to journalism and reporting!

>>4889864

made a graphic on that one: >>4869712

on the "making a connection leads to uncovering", that line doesn't seem to fit in that crumb

but if Q is referring to the [0], delta that'd be really interesting

and Q I think is referring to crumb #2658 when Q said "Think Drop Yesterday", meaning Q and POTUS (literally together) are focusing on the MSM/Fake News

>>4889864

there's a gap in the crumbs

>>4890153

It doesn't display all crumbs, only crumbs with deltas.

>>4890110

I hear ya on that [0] I've been trying to work that decode out myself. It seems to be a possible case of double meanings. Q can confirm?

>>4890220

>only crumbs with deltas.

ok, just wondering, thanks

> Q can confirm?

on that, when Q starts posting again, maybe we'll have moved this theory along so that detailed questions can be asked

I guess it'd start with the theories of detlas as comms

>>4890220

is this the latest link?

https://qanon.news/deltas.html

are we only using same-day deltas?

because what i was interested in was sorting by minutes not by date, the way it is now..

if we're only looking at same-day deltas then it wouldn't make sense to sort by minutes

sorry if this has been mentioned before, i've only been briefly scrolling through this bread when i get a chance

also for this current iteration, is it possible to sort in reverse order? i.e. first drops at the top?

or if sorting by minutes isn't feasible, is it possible to click a timestamp and show all other posts/tweets with that same :mm, regardless of date?

also i'm assuming i'm replying to the right codefag, don't know who's working on what

>>4887615

>>4883234

here the files, both WIP so take lightly

can an excelfag just post a link to the spreadsheet with the dates and hours removed, using that formula you mentioned, like i started doing here?

(and also somehow magically do the same for Q posts)

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vQMvZyhM5n1lf-ACCKErJTOA59mcVBrsaVkU3AkKYro/edit?usp=sharing

>>4896182

>>4884287

>So before 12/09 Q does not mention timestamp but on that day he does so why look for a 15 delta prior to that date?

that's what I noticed, there are a couple [15] deltas, and the first one is the one I put in my graphic (from 11/4/17)

>>4896118

>are we only using same-day deltas?

yes, at least for my theory yes

it could be that Q is doing deltas over days, but the examples Q pointed out are the same day and hour

>>4896488

agreed, except for the one that was 2 days later, which is why i want to look at minutes exclusively. to me that one instance alone indicates it’s plausible for there to be others but of course it wouldn’t be ~comms~ if Q had to point them all out so maybe that one was meant to be a “hint” to search for more

>>4896571

>>4896182

>>4896299

i’m not too lazy to do it myself and don’t mean to bark orders but i don’t have excel on my laptop, google sheets doesn’t have

full functionality, and i’d probably get fired if i tried to do it at work - ‘tried to’ being the operative words there kek

i’m sure the site(s) will be amazing tools when they’re done but the spreadsheet would be just fine for now

>>4896571

>except for the one that was 2 days later

which one was that??

>>4897133

RR out

marker missed? that one

>>4897701

>>4897133

kek we had this conversation already

we don’t fully agree on what markers mean but this is significant imo

>>4897720

based in minutes alone it’s a [:24] delta

why is this timestamp significant? why point out a (2 day +) [:24] delta? this is specifically related to winding the clock

Q was trying to show/teach us something

>>4897701

>>4897720

>>4897740

oohhhh ok gotcha

yup, made a graphic on this one

but it seems to me the two days was between the mention of RR (in this case Reagan) not between the timestamps

still thinking about the relevance of the timestamps, don't see anything

>>4897763

see my post above i’m phonefagging

this is directly related to the ‘’’timestamps’’’ of the RR out post and the reagan (RR) tweet

>>4897762

>>4897776

>Q was trying to show/teach us something

definitely agree with that

unsure what it means though, but that's definitely significant

might be others, but a very notable time Q said we missed a marker

>>4897763

it seems like it’s definitely about the timestamps bc when anon asked ronald reagan? Q pointed to the timestamps

i’m def repeating myself sleep deprived but idk how else to articulate it

if it was just about Q posting RR before potus and potus lowkey confirming in code then why all the “wind the clock” “timestamp” language in that next reply post? specific time stamps are important it seems

>>4897807

so if we go off what seems to be a safe assumption then it’s a [:24] delta (not one of the main 0 5 10) AND not in the same day

what does that tell us? whole reason i want to see ALL posts and tweets in order of minutes so i can see all the connections

i think it’ll be obvious imo..just have to find the pattern

can’t do that if everything is sorted chronologically

>>4897821

ok not obvious per se but i think it’ll “click”

the best solutions are simple, elegant that’s why they’re hard to find bc your brain wraps itself around itself looking for complexity and misses it

i just need to see everything in order

>>4897807

>>4897821

>>4897834

agreed, unclear what its meaning/significance is to me still

gotta keep looking at it

but this is a good delta/timestamp/marker post to study, __because it ties in STRINGERS too

most of that [RR-out] post is stringers

I'll keep looking at it tomorrow

>>4897838

>tomorrow

*morning

whatever, kek

>>4897821

Go to spreadsheet .. Sort column data

>>4897850

kek tomorrow is today

oh shit

TOMORROW IS TODAY

does Q ever mention the present? why is it always future and past?

MAYBE FUTURE AND PAST ARE NOT TO BE TAKEN LITERALLY BUT CODE which will make sense once we figure out the relationship between present past and future posts aka deltas

i’m losing it i sound like a lunatic it’s 4am my time but think about it! sleep on it!

>>4897872

dude it’s not that simple

my data has to be cleaned up there are dates and hours in it

6,000 tweets and over 2,000 drops or something? if it was that easy this thread wouldn’t exist

>>4897876

I know how u feel .. Aus Anon here …. sometimes you fall in to deep looking for connections .. and then look at the clock and its 3am

>>4897872

right now date hour minutes seconds and content of the tweet is in one cell

and i don’t even have raw data for the q posts

and there’s no way to sort it by minutes on the site codefag in this bread made

>>4897883

You could sort by hour then minute …

I thought they had done a lot of that already in

Spreadsheet Timestamps/Deltas: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OqTR0hPipmL9NE4u_JAzBiWXov3YYOIZIw6nPe3t4wo/

>>4897886

no no i’m not even looking for them they find me!

>>4897895

i want to ignore hours completely

>>4897892

do you want to drop your spreadsheet somewhere and i will see if theres a quick fix?

>>4897906

i posted it like 3 times in here!! search my id im ohonefagging and 73% asleep

ok will do ..

I was able to split times into HH MH SS without too much trouble. That the sort of thing u looking for ?

Obviously would also have to see if we can export the data and time data from the spreadsheet first.

>>4897913

Go make it 100% and I will go find it and have a tinker and see if there's anything I can do to help.

>>4897923

>>4897923

idk what the difference between mm and min is but YES ALL I NEED IS THAT ONE COLUMN >>4897927 go make what 100%? spreadsheet is on google docs on an anonymous email

>>4897927

and thank you!!

sorry for shitting up the bread, everyone

>>4897902

Good news .. Have been able to split data from tweet .. dont ask me how (It was a process).. trying to split date data now to make it more useable

>>4897936

Go to 100% sleep I meant and let me tinker ;P

>>4897978

OK Hopefully thats the sort of thing you were after - Let me know how u go.

https://ufile.io/4tdl2

>>4896118

Latest link = https://qanon.news/deltas.html

Hmm same day deltas? Based on my not really knowing what you mean on that I'd say no. By default the system ignores any tweets that are not 60 minutes before or 60 minutes after a Q drop.

>>4898372

The spreadsheet with all DJT Tweets and Deltas (between tweets) including hr/min/ss delta data … its here for anyone who wants to have a play with it.

https://ufile.io/4tdl2

>>4897876

Time references rarely are current in the crumbs in my opinion. Only cases are disinfo or lesson/directions.

yesterday/today/tomorrow/next week/etc are relative to the date that proves that crumb, that's why it unlocks the map

That's also why datefagging lead to so much concernfagging and shill-fest

>>4897821

>>4897763

>>4897762

>>4897701

>>4896571

Not sure how to threat this but maybe we should mark them as 2d[:24] (or w/m/y for weeks/months/years)

So far I think we have 4 types of deltas:

1) Q<->POTUS (last Q crumb and first next tweet, basic [5][10]etc)

2) Q<->POTUS (a Q crumb and the tweet that logically connects, ex: [RR-out])

3) POTUS<->POTUS (delta between 2 consecutive tweets, I'd say probably within the same out, ex: consensual/consequential)

4) Q<->Q (long term delta to Q, es [1y delta])

Also, do we have any theory on timestamp as checksum of the crumb?

There was an anon that look at this but I never bought it because he used seconds.

Q#1430 mentions:

>Clarification.

>We exposed the password [#91] on purpose [23].

>Subsequent posts [on here] were then made by Anons.

>Timestamps verify.

What's said here is that even without the trip we can discern which are Q posts and which are not based on the timestamp alone.

So far I've no theory as how to do it.

Two possibilities:

1) Crumb and timestamp verify as standalone

2) Crumb and timestamp verify relative to other crumbs

3) timestamp verify by delta only

For (1) I would try to find all Q crumb that are exactly the same (pic related) and try to find a relationship between the text and the timestamp.

In this case seconds should not matter, imo.

For (2) seconds could matter but only in past crumbs because at that point its a known reliable datapoint to build on.

For (3) I guess we'll find out anyway we the other deltafagging.

Do we have a running list of theory for specific things?

I know this isn't strictly delta related and don't want to slide but, for examlpe, the character - in stringer I think means to shift the words in the phrase we'll be looking for (A-B = B A).

Examples:

[RR-out] = out the old Ronald Reagan

Divert-ATT_CAP_H = AT&T Diverted Capital Home

>>4899438

>probably within the same out

HOUR

>Two possibilities:

Never write the number of bullet points, right? :)

>>4899438

agreed on most of that post

except on this:

>Subsequent posts [on here] were then made by Anons.

>Timestamps verify.

Q was simply saying other were making posts using the tripcode, and the timestamps verify it was not Q, but anons fucking around

though, it shows timestamps are important for verifications

I'm totaling all the significant deltas based on the deltas shown on https://qanon.news/deltas.html

BUT, if you look at my graphic, it seems Q's confirmed deltas are ALL Q inb4 POTUS

so I'm going to tally each delta, then make a different tally of the ones that are ONLY Q inb4 POTUS, so essentially only positive deltas

graphic here: >>4883012

interdasting little thing I noticed

if [15] is for delta testing, it seems like Q was trying to get [15] deltas for EACH test, but missed with a [17] and two [16]s before getting the [15]

and the [0] before those indicating POTUS and Q were together testing this

just something I noticed

>>4898880

would it be possible to do a 'filter by delta' feature?

>>4905739

Yep. Using a dropdown or a textbox? If dropdown what deltas specifically?

>>4906087

whatever works better/is easier for you

but imo:

0, 1, 5, 10, and 15

the others (2, 6, 7, and 17) if you want, but those were only used once each (and not exactly confirmed by Q, just noted)

DELTA TOTALS:

(BOTH +/- deltas)

[0] = 14

[1] = 33

[5] = 36

[10] = 26

[15] = 24

OTHERS:

[2] = 36

[6] = 42

[7] = 34

[17] = 25

—————————————————-

(JUST deltas)

[0] = 14

[1] = 17

[5] = 17

[10] = 12

[15] = 14

OTHERS:

[2] = 18

[6] = 17

[7] = 18

[17] = 14

([0] isn't +/-)

will compile the list of the crumb# later, I have that

also, I'll recount when the filter is applied

>>4906694

>(JUST deltas)

meant just + deltas

>>4902768

oh, shit. Didn't even consider that! ahah, sometimes the simplest explanation will do.

>>4903843

Check first pic here >>4896155

Post #497 has [15] which is a POTUS-POTUS delta

Unless i'm forgetting something

BTW is your code published anywhere? Curious codefag, might be able to help

>>4906790

it's not my code, I'm using https://qanon.news/deltas.html

that's a great timeline graphic by the way

and you can use http://www.trumptwitterarchive.com for the seconds timestamp for crumbs

>POTUS-POTUS delta

we're focusing on the Q-POTUS delta at the moment, the POTUS-POTUS deltas are important too, per Q

pretty interdasting when you look at the # of deltas

thought there'd be MUCH moar

(+&-) is the deltas with both Q inb4 POTUS and POTUS inb4 Q; (+) is JUST the deltas with Q inb4 POTUS

>>4899174

>https://ufile.io/4tdl2

anon i'm using excel online and sorting by minutes isn't happening

codefag here. any pmfags here keeping track of what needs to be worked on?

Whoever is looking at doing the spider web. Could the rings be divided as:

5 present be inside circle

10 next circle out

15 outer circle

Seems like tableau would have a method for showing these this way too. js

timestamp>delta 5,10,15clock

delta 0,1>marker>news>map

Does Q specify any other deltas?

>>4909264

Try this one .. have converted them all to values and turned Sort and Filter on.

https://ufile.io/bm5dq

See if that helps.

>>4911770

Not that I'm aware of.

If you need ideas this is a bit of a slide but I think we need a tool to store and navigate the research done on the crumbs.

I'm not sure how other anons are currently keeping track of everything.

Searching and stuff is all good but we need to store it somewhere. This was supposed to be the MAP but we're not there yet, it seems.

Main points would be:

nosql graph as database (eg: orientDB)

Should contain at least crumb and tweets.

Support for custom text would enable NEWS, definitions, proofs or other things.

Everything should be linkable to crumbs or specifically single lines of them.

Links between all exactly repeated lines should be built-in. Maybe suggest also very similar ones (hunt for red october/red october) but probably overkill and anon would do them faster.

Tags are a must to categorize most objects. Think legend.

Like 'answers' on qanon.pub comments can be added to single lines or groups and overall crumb/tweet/info

Navigation should help see connections made and review them.

Then will come more complex stuff but that's a good base.

If people are interested in something like this some operational points should be discussed. We can meet in the codefag thread or some temp chatroom.

>>4913258

think RADAR? :)

>>4913333

I was thinking more of a spiral cone with the

[5] present at the top of it followed by

[10] past as the next spiral moving out

[15] past as farthest away

I've thought the farthest was JFK the starting point, but from others work I'm seeing that it may be the military, both fit with the with Q/without Q message.

>>4913333

How does one read radar? Is it in sectors, so within each ring one would add the deltas? Where would be the starting point?

>>4913228

>This was supposed to be the MAP but we're not there yet

the map would be something like this on qmap.pub:

https://qmap.pub/analytics/network

a stand lone interactive spider/mind map with all the people, organizations, agencies, and events

you have to search for something on qmap, it'd be great to have a Map as it's own thing

but imo, the clock is just paying attention to deltas

basically two main things in this thread, all need codefags

kek, and I'm not one

>>4913481

Do to workfagging I've looked at graphs and graphs layouts for most of the past year.

My take is QMAP needs a specific layout.

Anyway in the end it all comes down to:

>when is a map useful?

It's unclear the detail level were working with, pics related

>>4908352

great work!

So when all 0/1/5/10/15 hits 17 we're there ;))

How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible?

>>4897876

>why is it always future and past?

>MAYBE FUTURE AND PAST ARE NOT TO BE TAKEN LITERALLY BUT CODE which will make sense once we figure out the relationship between present past and future posts aka deltas

>i’m losing it i sound like a lunatic

You arr not crazy.

Have been looking at Post #128 alot. Q asks alot of questions about maps, legends, keys. Then in a seemingly nonsequitor question, asks What is a sequence?

(quote from same post)

"Past provides present.

Map provides picture"

Did you notice Q did not say PROVES but rather PROVIDES?

(read)

PAST prov ID es PRESENT.

MAP prov ID es PICTURE.

At the beginning of the post, Q says basically that they need to explain(in that post) how to read the Map/graphic in order to continue.

Have been thinking for a while now that there is a SEQUENCE provided in that post in order to continue, as Q says.

Thinking Q strongly hinting at the picture shown (at the time of that post). Word PICTURE mentioned many times, Interestingly, in that post, the graphic only showed 1 picture- the AF1 pic.

Sorry phonefagging this but I thnk it was labeled NULL. An interesting word to use as it is used in Set Theory and shown as: [].

Inteestingly also, the ID in a (future) pic AF2, i believe, does contain numbers in it.

A Sequence is defined as a series of numbers.

Just spitballing here, my autism is showing maybe, but in Sequence theory, the symbol ! is used. Interestingly, soon after, Q started using a ! in his ID.

Need some serious Mathfags to take a look at Post 128.

I think 125 was the AF1 photo.

Was there any embedded info in the relevant photos?

Direction/orientation?

I think Q also mentioned, Think direction.

Well, there's my crazy ramblings.

Any thoughts on the ID added twice in the word PROVES?

>>4914410

some thoughts…

127 posts without ID(trip)

x-numbers of Q ID (don't know how many ID(trip) Q has used?)

Could each Q ID be connected to x numbers of the 127 post. So the 127 posts is the PAST PICTURE connecting to PRESENT (future) Q ID's

Will look more into post 128

Great phonefagging post anon!

>>4905739

Updated. Still need to implement a 'combo filter' where you can filter by delta + day if needed. I added in a few extra deltas to the dropdown. It's only finding the (+) deltas, even though if you were filtering on [1] sometime there's a [-1] associated with that drop.

>>4913481

https://www.draw.io this might work at least for now.

>>4917884

I've looked into that when I was thinking about the map

then I tried to find the "43 confirmed connections" and got stuck

then I moved to the deltas

>>4915909

I'm seeing less than I saw without the filter, gonna check it out

>>4918224

https://thebrain.com/

Perhaps this?

>>4919210

something like that

the hardest part of making The Map would be knowing what to put in it and what connections to add

there's so much

>>4914578

Might be useful:

What is a Sequence?

A Sequence is a list of things (usually numbers) that are in order.

Sequence 3,5,7,9,…

Infinite or Finite

When the sequence goes on forever it is called an infinite sequence,

otherwise it is a finite sequence

Examples:

{1, 2, 3, 4, …} is a very simple sequence (and it is an infinite sequence)

{20, 25, 30, 35, …} is also an infinite sequence

{1, 3, 5, 7} is the sequence of the first 4 odd numbers (and is a finite sequence)

{4, 3, 2, 1} is 4 to 1 backwards

{1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, …} is an infinite sequence where every term doubles

{a, b, c, d, e} is the sequence of the first 5 letters alphabetically

{f, r, e, d} is the sequence of letters in the name "fred"

{0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, …} is the sequence of alternating 0s and 1s (yes they are in order, it is an alternating order in this case)

In Order

When we say the terms are "in order", we are free to define what order that is! They could go forwards, backwards … or they could alternate … or any type of order we want!

Like a Set

A Sequence is like a Set, except:

the terms are in order (with Sets the order does not matter)

the same value can appear many times (only once in Sets)

Example: {0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, …} is the sequence of alternating 0s and 1s.

The set is just {0,1}

Notation

Sequences also use the same notation a sets:

list each element, separated by a comma,

and then put curly brackets around the whole thing. {3, 5, 7, …}

The curly brackets { } are sometimes called "set brackets" or "braces".

A great resource for Anons seeking very simple refresher (or a friendly first exposure) in Sequences and Sets is: Mathisfun.com

>>4914578

Some info on Sets and subsets. Include this as it relates to the fact that a SET (A) which contains a SUBSET (B) cannot exist if you remove the subset.

Does that make the subset a type of KEYSTONE? - A "numerical" keystone?

No offense to Anons looking for a visual keystone symbol, but a keystone is something contained in the larger "set" that if you remove it, the larger "set" cannot exist.

>>4914410

>>4920740

>>4921014

I think these are on target .

The only sequence diagram I know of is UML, pic related.

This would match the idea that a crumb line is a connection/link. This would bring to another crumb (as a function/method call for codefags).

Remember Q says

> the map is in front of you

Look what is in front of you

Now have multiple columns of that

It resembles the original graphics Q confirmed. Problem is there was no connection drawn on them.

> It's all about the BREAK

When do you change column?

The sequence could be telling us just that

Possibye there are multiple sequences involved

Thoughts?

>>4918218

same here

>>4922049

Look what is in front of you

Yes. Agreed 100%

Wanted to post some ID's relevant to the time period before(past) and after(future) Q post #128.

disclaimer- not implying I know what's going on yet, just "seeing things" that are catching my eye.

(using the 2 "provIDes"sentences)

1st sentence-

FUTURE provIDes PAST

I think the next (future) ID is:

aByDDr/l

I think the previous(past) ID is

KKlreCTB

2nd sentence-

MAP provIDes PICTURE

I think the MAP(post#128) ID is:

!lTP.qbhqo

I think the PICTURE ID(from post#125) is NOjYpEdl

Possibly relevant to these is also the trip ID for the second PICTURE(future)AF2? photo. It is similar to the MAP ID.

It is Dx5TPc5d. They both have the letter TP in them but the first is TPb, the second is TPc

The picture png #s might be of interest to our Deltafags, maybe not.

But here are the numbers:

AF1- 1510098237174.png

AF2- 1510288305037.png

May be nothing, but those 1s, 5s, 10s are interesting

>>4922842

Sorry- MAP(post#128) ID is:

!lTPb.qbhqo

>>4922842

>AF1- 1510098237174.png

>AF2- 1510288305037.png

Those seem UNIX timestamps

>>4923012

Take a look at the Future provides past(past ID, prior to the AF1- pic)

It is: KKlreCTB

Is the Q ID pointing us toward a use of Linux?

"CTB File Extension

2 file types use the .ctb file extension.

AutoCAD Color-Based Plot Style File

Developer Autodesk

Popularity

Category Settings Files

Format Binary

What is a CTB file?

File used by AutoCAD, a CAD program used for 2D and 3D drawing; contains color-based plot styles, or mappings of colors to layers of objects; used to attach color and display settings to design objects.

More Information

CTB files can be replaced by the newer .STB format, which abstracts layer color-based properties to object-based properties. Many companies still use CTB files instead of STB files because of the cost required to train personnel and to upgrade existing CAD designs.

NOTE: CTB files and STB files cannot both be used within the same CAD design. CTB files may be converted to STB files using AutoCAD.

Programs that open CTB files

Windows

Autodesk AutoCAD 2018

Updated 1/6/2010

Cherrytree SQLite Document

Developer giuspen

Popularity

Category Data Files

Format N/A

.CTB File Association 2

A CTB file is a document created by Cherrytree, a note-taking application. It stores document data in SQLite format, which may include text, tables, images, objects, and document settings. CTB files protected with a password are saved as .CTX files.

More Information

Users typically save Cherrytree documents as CTB or CTX files. However, they may also save documents in XML format as .CTD files. Password-protected CTD files are saved as .CTZ files. CTD and CTZ files are useful for saving documents that are smaller in size than CTB and CTX files.

NOTE: Cherrytree is developed by giuspen, a portmanteau of Giuseppe Penone.

Programs that open CTB files

Windows

giuspen Cherrytree

Linux <~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~?

giuspen Cherrytree

Updated 4/23/2018

>>4913153 ok thank you this comes closer to what i needed but the seconds are seemingly random..?

can you make it sort by minutes and THEN by seconds? idk why i need it that way but it makes more sense to me

and can you do the same thing with the q drops?

like a sheet for each and then a sheet with both

going to see if the deltas from https://qanon.news/deltas.html have any significances or comms

we know the ones Q confirmed did, and all those were Q inb4 POTUS (+ delta), so I'm going to start with those

Proposal for the qanon.news anon

Often anons point out draw.io to lay out the crumbs and make connections as graphic.

Problem is, it's a mess to add the crumbs into it manually.

The tool supports custom libraries of "shapes" which can be just images.

(looked into putting HTML into them but doesn't seem trivial)

A library is just a funny xml that actually contains json data, pic related.

Now, ASSUMING putting all crumbs into a single library would make it unsuable…it would be useful to be able to select some desired crumbs and generate a custom library on demand.

Example: I need crumbs containing "keystone" to make some q proof.

Filter them as usual by keyword

Select the ones I need

Export to library -save xml locally

Go to draw.io and import said xml

Draw proof

???

Profit

The "xml" seems very basic.

Just a JSON array containing JSON object with image urls or base64 encoded images, some metadata about title and dimensions. All wrapped in a simple <mxlibrarytag.

<mxlibrary>[ { "data": //url or base64 , "w": //width , "h": //height , "title": "Q#1" , "aspect": "fixed" } , {...}]</mxlibrary>

I'm not sure if you would be able to host the images and use URLs or would be more appropriate to embed the base64 strings.

UPDATED

A Nice Example

>>4933573

updated to show est

>>4931141

>draw.io

Hive mind. I looked into that very thing this morning and then had to do other things.

I think I see where you are going. I'll have to look more into what I can do with it.

>>4931141

This is doable the problem is the datasets tend to get so large that running it locally is the only sane option.

>>4933951

>>4934004

there's this too:

https://gephi.org

a "Q Map" would be such a large amount of data and connections with all the names, organizations, agencies, events, etc to have all in one Map/Graphic

>>4933630

kek, reposting from general:

so this is essentially how this delta marker theory works

you look for a delta between either POTUS-POTUS or Q-POTUS

the [10] delta, from deltas that Q has confirmed as examples, seems to be a message that isn't easily known (as opposed to a [5] delta where it's a moar overt message)

you metaphorically "start the clock" when a post is made, then "stop the clock" to record the delta

either way, whether there's a significant delta or not, you'd then metaphorically "wind the clock back to 0" to look for another delta

Q's confirmed deltas for comms are [0], [1], [5], [10], and [15]; with mentions or implications of [2], [6], [7], and [17] deltas (once each)

on the J before G, POTUS would've needed to do it this way to be able to make the comms (had to correct it, so J had to come before G)

this was the first in real time application of it, thought it was cool actually

>>4937416

>you'd then metaphorically "wind the clock back to 0" to look for another delta

There are 5 posts that mention 'GJ'. why did you choose the last one?

>>4933951

Ask if you need info. I've looked enough at the underying JS library (mxgraph).

I was looking at it again to envision a dedicated custom frontend for a "Q canvas" where all post would be laid out with some kind of logic in 2D (a matrix) and the user would navigate it like google maps

Sometimes the delta is a date or time stamp. Here's an example of a delta that is clearly a date.

>>4937782

just for space, I could've picked any or all really

they're all related to Huber's GJ(s) I think

>>4937782

Do you have the ability to put that frontend together?

>>4940475

A prototype isn't that difficult to make. The library does most of job which is draw, zoom & pan.

Javascript isn't my main language but I think I handle it, yes.

The main question is usability/performance when there are 2k crumbs and 6k tweets in it.

An other way would be to make a fake layer/ovelay in a real mapping library but I've zero experience with that.

updated the simple graphic to just show the confirmed deltas without the theories

realized it's plausible ALL are a message in their own way, not specific to the [#]

(basically, all the confirmed [#] deltas are messages, regardless of the #)

but still going with my theories

>>4942528

messed one up

Why would he go so far in code to be so far above the target audience head?

Wouldn't it defeat the purpose?

>>4944481

what do you mean?

Anons, any working theory on periods of Q silence?

The horizontal box is probably Q team sleeping.

The vertical silence (multiple days) can't be Q team is on vacation.

There must be a connection with the map and I suspect those dates can't be used - mathematically - for adding crumbs to the map.

Any thoughts?

>>4944481

The purpose is having COMMS where there seems to be none. That's the whole point. Plausible deniability.

>>4947728

>Anons, any working theory on periods of Q silence?

I've thought about it before briefly, but it's always so random it seems I don't go into

it'd be interesting to see if there's some pattern with Q's 'blackouts'

>>4922049

I want to keep posting on SEQUENCES, not to distract but rather to keep us thinking new thoughts- kind of brain snacks to keep us thinking creatively and maybe see things in a new way, and HOPEFULLY find a sewuence or a key. (brainfood below)

A RULE:

A Sequence usually has a Rule, which is a way to find the value of each term.

Example: the sequence {3, 5, 7, 9, …} starts at 3 and jumps 2 every time:

{3, 5, 7, 9, …}

As a Formula

Saying "starts at 3 and jumps 2 every time" is fine, but it doesn't help us calculate the:

10th term,

100th term, or

nth term, where n could be any term number we want.

So, we want a formula with "n" in it (where n is any term number).

So, What Can A Rule For {3, 5, 7, 9, …} Be?

Firstly, we can see the sequence goes up 2 every time, so we can guess that a Rule is something like "2 times n" (where "n" is the term number). Let's test it out:

Test Rule: 2n

n Term Test Rule

1 3 2n = 2×1 = 2

2 5 2n = 2×2 = 4

3 7 2n = 2×3 = 6

That nearly worked … but it is too low by 1 every time, so let us try changing it to:

Test Rule: 2n+1

n Term Test Rule

1 3 2n+1 = 2×1 + 1 = 3

2 5 2n+1 = 2×2 + 1 = 5

3 7 2n+1 = 2×3 + 1 = 7

That Works!

So instead of saying "starts at 3 and jumps 2 every time" we write this:

2n+1

Now we can calculate, for example, the 100th term:

2 × 100 + 1 = 201

Brainfood for SEQUENCES:

MANY RULES:

But mathematics is so powerful we can find more than one Rule that works for any sequence.

Example: the sequence {3, 5, 7, 9, …}

We have just shown a Rule for {3, 5, 7, 9, …} is: 2n+1

And so we get: {3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, …}

But can we find another rule?

How about "odd numbers without a 1 in them":

And we get: {3, 5, 7, 9, 23, 25, …}

A completely different sequence!

And we could find more rules that match {3, 5, 7, 9, …}. Really we could.

So it is best to say "A Rule" rather then "The Rule" (unless we know it is the right Rule).

NOTATION USED:

To make it easier to use rules, we often use this special style:

sequence term

xn is the term

n is the term number

Example: to mention the "5th term" we write: x5

So a rule for {3, 5, 7, 9, …} can be written as an equation like this:

xn = 2n+1

And to calculate the 10th term we can write:

x10 = 2n+1 = 2×10+1 = 21

I like the one below because it involves differences between numbers(maybe we can use deltas?)

ARITHMETIC SEQUENCES:

In an Arithmetic Sequence the difference between one term and the next is a constant.

In other words, we just add some value each time … on to infinity.

Example:

1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, …

This sequence has a difference of 3 between each number.

Its Rule is xn = 3n-2

In General we can write an arithmetic sequence like this:

{a, a+d, a+2d, a+3d, … }

where:

a is the first term, and

d is the difference between the terms (called the "common difference")

And we can make the rule:

xn = a + d(n-1)

(We use "n-1" because d is not used in the 1st term).

GEOMETRIC SEQUENCES:

In a Geometric Sequence each term is found by multiplying the previous term by a constant.

Example:

2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, …

This sequence has a factor of 2 between each number.

Its Rule is xn = 2n

In General we can write a geometric sequence like this:

{a, ar, ar2, ar3, … }

where:

a is the first term, and

r is the factor between the terms (called the "common ratio")

Note: r should not be 0.

When r=0, we get the sequence {a,0,0,…} which is not geometric

And the rule is:

xn = ar(n-1)

(We use "n-1" because ar0 is the 1st term)

>>4948481

>>4948582

>>4948618

Please do, the SEQUENCE is extremely relevant and we need to find it. And as some anon said it could be the keystone to apply.

Talking about new ideas…

I just had a strange dream . First it was in english (not my first lang). Second I was on a military plane with some operators and POTUS was there drawing triangles on the QMAP. Then I woke up and thought that's nuts.

Now I was working on crumb #365 and stumbled on this, which I totally forgot about:

> 3 sides form what shape?

> Expand your thinking.

> Re-read crumbs.

> Q

3 sides -triangle!

So, thinking laterally about it, the idea that came is: maybe connections come out from the triangles if we draw them on the map (think crossroads/intersections). That would be why the graphic is critical, there's no other way to see the connection because its never direct.

So…on a normal 2D map we would use 2 coordinates X,Y to identify any point on it.

What if we are looking for sets of 3 numbers to identify the triangle?

Or even just 2 coordinates if we include the angles of the map by default. (in the dream that's how POTUS did it)

I'm trying to think about what the axes of map would be but I'm shooting in the dark so far, probably related to timestamp anyway.

As always I just hope these rambling enable new ideas for other anons.

Triangular Numbers

1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, 28, 36, 45, …

The Triangular Number Sequence is generated from a pattern of dots which form a triangle. starting with one dot by itself(gonna have to imagine a tringle around it), then 3 dots which form a triangle, then a triangle with three dots on ea. side, then a triangle with four dots on each side with one in the middle, then a triangle with five dots on each side with three dots in the shape of a triangle in the middle, and so forth.

By adding another row of dots and counting all the dots we can find the next number of the sequence.

But it is easier to use this Rule:

xn = n(n+1)/2

Example:

the 5th Triangular Number is x5 = 5(5+1)/2 = 15,

and the sixth is x6 = 6(6+1)/2 = 21

SQUARE NUMBERS SEQUENCE:

1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, …

The next number is made by squaring WHERE IT IS in the pattern!

This needs some explanation but it is genius! Think POSiTION of the number! First position =1, second position =2, third position =3, etc

1 squared=1

2 squared=4

3 squared=9

4 squared=16

Rule is xn = n2

I love this sequence code. It is sooo Q. Now how is that for a sequence?

>>4948748

That is an exciting theory Anon. How does MIL find ememy's position to call in an airstrike against them?

By TRIANGULATION.

You need 2 different observers in different locations (with known coordinates). Each calls in an azimuth reading on a compass toward the target from their respective locations).

Field Artillery draws a line along the azimuths given from the two observors" known locations on the map and where the 2 azimuths cross- they get the location(coordinates) of the target on a map.

CUBE NUMBERS SEQUECE:

1, 8, 27, 64, 125, 216, 343, 512, 729, …

The next number is made by cubing WHERE IT IS in the pattern.

Rule is xn = n3

This is another exciting sequence because it involves LOCATION of the number.

1st location =1

2nd location =2

3rd location =3

etc.

1 cubed = 1

2 cubed = 8

3 cubed = 27

etc.

FIBONACCI SEQUENCE:

This is the Fibonacci Sequence

0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, …

The next number is found by adding the two numbers before it together:

The 2 is found by adding the two numbers before it (1+1)

The 21 is found by adding the two numbers before it (8+13)

etc…

Rule is xn = xn-1 + xn-2

That rule is interesting because it depends on the values of the previous two terms.

Rules like that are called recursive formulas.

The Fibonacci Sequence is numbered from 0 onwards like this:

n = 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 …

xn = 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 …

Example: term "6" is calculated like this:

x6 = x6-1 + x6-2 = x5 + x4 = 5 + 3 = 8

>>4948748

>>4949152

Talk about syncronicity…

Still working on #365 and look what's right there

> “The Great Awakening”

> POTUS today.

Funnily enough on Dec 14 Q had problems with CBTS boards

and posted #350 as anon which starts with:

> Shall we play a game?

Same as line 3 on #365

On Dec 19 there was no meaningful delta…

Luckily there is a tweet that starts with 'Today' on Dec 14, pic related

In the video he says "We'll have a Great…regulatory climate"

> CUT THE RED TAPE

>>4949152

I'll add a couple of graphics about

triangulation vs trilateration

Seeking only to assist… Attached is the s/sheet we have been using on ATS for almost a year.

It has evolved to include:

1) @realdonaldtrump tweets since Nov 2016

2) All Q posts

3) For both (1) and (2) it contains all:

a) Post2Post, Tweet2Post, Post2Tweet, Tweet2Tweet Deltas

b) Timestamp checksums

c) IntraDeltas and MirrorDeltas

d) Timestamp2Acronyms and TimeDelta2Acronyms

e) CAPS only decodes

f) Guccifer decodes for "q", "Q", "p", "P"

g) StartOfLine and StartOfSentence decodes

h) Biblical verses

i) Search on any punctuation

j) Q signatures

k) MagicSqare tool upto 40x40 for COVFEFE decodes using HH:MM, MM:SS or Intradelta for grid size

l) Qclock Easy Search tool highlighting 3 mirrors and dropboxes by date

m) Cryptex tool that allows individual lines or whole Post/tweet to be rotated left/right

n) Simple Gematria tool gives results for each word and line for whole post/tweet

o) Posts per day calendar that shows weekly focus messages such as CAM4 over last SOTU

p) Overlay tool - allows you to see only common characters when 2 posts/tweets are overlaid

q) Quartered posts shows side by side of all posts divisible by 4 such as 1600 gives 1200, 800, 400

r) Logic variable glued posts - groups lines from different posts with same [killbox] contents

s) data sheets for ASCII, Morse, Periodic table, reserve banks, SkullnBones members 1831-2006.

NB

It deliberately AVOIDS any Visual Basic Macros, instead using formulae only.

Separate s/sheets avail with pictures from all Q Posts.

Subject to crediting ATSanons you're welcome to:

1) Use as-is

2) Copy part or all and evolve

3) Have weekly updates of it (subject to requesting)

4) Totally ignore it

It is available at dropbox (12MB):

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yprf6tnpf6iw081/Q%20V15.0%2020190123%20%20to%202673%20incl.%20DECODE%20tools.xlsx?dl=0

>>4949532

Forgot to mention that the "Main Decode Results" tab shows all Q posts ad POTUS tweets on one sheet in chronological order.

Allows search of both plus their main decodes for strings etc.

>>4949532

…and that the Q clock search flags up 20 odd codes in timestamps: mirrors, 17, 23, 5:5, checksums etc

>>4949532

Sorry, we anons can live compartmented from eachother. What is the ATS thread?

>>4914410

timestamp>delta 5,10,15clock

deltas 0,1markers> news> map

sequence is a timeline

Q says everything is important, does not mean everything goes everywhere, let's say you are giving a lecture are you going to try to say everything there is to say about the subject? No, you pick out the most relevant info in order to get the gist across while still providing a thought process that can be followed.

If everything went on the map or the clock why would Q give directions on hoe to find the deltas in the first place?

I just wish we had a shout out from Q or an operator that we are at least a bit closer with this thread to understanding the comms.

>>4949756

AboveTopSecret.Com

Here's a URL to part 15 of our thread that has been going since Oct 2017:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1229643/pg1

>>4949756

Been trying to stimulate some cross-pollination between our boards for months.

I no many of our memebers regly lurk n poft here too.

>>4949756

An example post on ATS proving Q told us Jan 5th, gubmint wld reopen 25th:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1229643/pg69#pid24143766

>>4949886

Sure would be nice to have some GovtAnon who knows codes stop by to ease us in the right direction.

I feel good about this group here.

I don't know Excel but am hopeful some Anon here will make a spreadsheet that makes a sequence stand out. It's time to solve the map. For my money, this is the thread to watch.

deltafags…help needed here.

Still on #365, trying to identify:

Q/POTUS-1

Q/POTUS-2

Q/POTUS-3

Q/POTUS-4 [10]

Q/POTUS-5

I think we can safely assume Q/POTUS-4 is #334 (Merry Christmas vs Happy Hanukkah)

But why 4?

On 12/12/2017 there were exacly 5 tweets but that's the fifth of the day, not the fourth. Counting from 0 would still miss the fifth.

So I've been looking at positive deltas starting from the first "shutdown" on Q#282

POSITIVE DELTA FROM #282:

#306 [7]

#307 [3]

#308 [16]

#309 [9]

#310 [3]

POSITIVE DELTA AFTER #334:

#432 [34]

#433 [32]

#434 [20]

Sadly all after #365

An other option would be to limit the search between the second "shutdown", which is post #332, and post #365 but the only Q/POTUS delta in there is #334.

What's your take? which 5 deltas would you consider given 4 is Q#334/T-361?

>>4950168

Forgot to add, funny thing about that [10] delta.

I think it was a "message sent."

As in look what was just signed

Less than 2 days later Q lost access to the board and had to change tripcode. First pic related.

Technically there is no such thing as 'getting closer' when talking about cracking an hash but then second pic.

>>4950168

>Q/POTUS-1

>Q/POTUS-2

>Q/POTUS-3

>Q/POTUS-4 [10]

>Q/POTUS-5

I must admit my autism is not with deltas and time stamps BUT- what is the reference of these Q/POTUS deltas? When?

Are they literally the first 5 Q/POTUS deltas? Even if they are not, amd maybe they are from a new point, then If the 4th is known, then go to the next, (5th?) and give us the delta. For the other three, try going back from the 4th. Kind of like a crossword puzzle- always work from what is known. Fill it in from there.