>>4854928

>https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vQMvZyhM5n1lf-ACCKErJTOA59mcVBrsaVkU3AkKYro/edit?usp=sharing

we need:

-one sheet for tweets (we need to remove dates and move the text of the tweets into adjacent cells - excelfags had a formula for this)

-another sheet for crumbs

-a combined sheet with crumbs in one column, tweets in another, sorted by timestamp (with the ability to link to the relevant cells in first 2 sheets). in the third column, we could merge cells and type in the delta between the first two columns?

i'm not sure this is the best way to sort/display the data, just throwing some ideas out there - there should be 2-3 excelfags in this thread including op

Resources

https://qanon.news/posts.html

http://trumptwitterarchive.com/archive

>>4855837

ok it may not be a delta marker but how do you define "regular marker"?

because either way, Q said it had to do with the timestamps of both the tweet and the crumb/drop

and that the clock is wound with all markers, including this one, so the logical conclusion would be there is a correlation between the timestamp of the tweet and the timestamp of the crumb (which is basically what we look at for delta markers)

>>4855837 i agree these confirmed markers are probably most significant and where we should focus first. looking at other possible deltas in more of an exploratory way imo

>>4856027

perfect, we may not have to reinvent the wheel

>>4856074 gotcha and sorry to be so annoying about this, also past my bedtime, but i think it's safe to say imo that either way, even the delta markers are less about the numbers themselves and more about what they signify on the clock/map, i.e. comms? the numbers point to the comms

so these regular markers are like one step closer in that they are more direct comms - at least that's how i see it

i also always assumed that the timestamp of the post with the marker was the marker as well but i'm seeing now i might be wrong about that, idk

>>4866505

>>4863895

>>4863570

>>4861997

wow you guys have done an incredible job so far

and to think i was going to just copy and paste all the data into an excel file and do everything MANUALLY kek

not much i can do now that the codefags have it handled but i look forward to using the tool once it's done. thank you all again. this thread is /qresearch/ at its best

>>4881584

>>4882621

markers have to do with videos?? are you referring to the post with 1:07?

would love to hear more

>>4882635 kek see current general bread title

>>4882738

>it's a plausible and simple theory all based off crumbs and Q's usage of the deltas for what seem like comms

kek i know.. i am all for the deltas. i baked current bread and gave it a shout out.. and your theory is what inspired me to attempt to sort the drops and tweets in order of timestamp until excelfags came to my rescue and then codefags came to their rescue and here we are now all happily deltafagging away

>>4882872

oops did not mean to spoil that

>>4890220

is this the latest link?

https://qanon.news/deltas.html

are we only using same-day deltas?

because what i was interested in was sorting by minutes not by date, the way it is now..

if we're only looking at same-day deltas then it wouldn't make sense to sort by minutes

sorry if this has been mentioned before, i've only been briefly scrolling through this bread when i get a chance

also for this current iteration, is it possible to sort in reverse order? i.e. first drops at the top?

or if sorting by minutes isn't feasible, is it possible to click a timestamp and show all other posts/tweets with that same :mm, regardless of date?

also i'm assuming i'm replying to the right codefag, don't know who's working on what

can an excelfag just post a link to the spreadsheet with the dates and hours removed, using that formula you mentioned, like i started doing here?

(and also somehow magically do the same for Q posts)

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vQMvZyhM5n1lf-ACCKErJTOA59mcVBrsaVkU3AkKYro/edit?usp=sharing

>>4896182

>>4896488

agreed, except for the one that was 2 days later, which is why i want to look at minutes exclusively. to me that one instance alone indicates it’s plausible for there to be others but of course it wouldn’t be ~comms~ if Q had to point them all out so maybe that one was meant to be a “hint” to search for more

>>4896571

>>4896182

>>4896299

i’m not too lazy to do it myself and don’t mean to bark orders but i don’t have excel on my laptop, google sheets doesn’t have

full functionality, and i’d probably get fired if i tried to do it at work - ‘tried to’ being the operative words there kek

i’m sure the site(s) will be amazing tools when they’re done but the spreadsheet would be just fine for now

>>4897133

RR out

marker missed? that one

>>4897701

>>4897133

kek we had this conversation already

we don’t fully agree on what markers mean but this is significant imo

>>4897720

based in minutes alone it’s a [:24] delta

why is this timestamp significant? why point out a (2 day +) [:24] delta? this is specifically related to winding the clock

Q was trying to show/teach us something

>>4897763

see my post above i’m phonefagging

this is directly related to the ‘’’timestamps’’’ of the RR out post and the reagan (RR) tweet

>>4897763

it seems like it’s definitely about the timestamps bc when anon asked ronald reagan? Q pointed to the timestamps

i’m def repeating myself sleep deprived but idk how else to articulate it

if it was just about Q posting RR before potus and potus lowkey confirming in code then why all the “wind the clock” “timestamp” language in that next reply post? specific time stamps are important it seems

>>4897807

so if we go off what seems to be a safe assumption then it’s a [:24] delta (not one of the main 0 5 10) AND not in the same day

what does that tell us? whole reason i want to see ALL posts and tweets in order of minutes so i can see all the connections

i think it’ll be obvious imo..just have to find the pattern

can’t do that if everything is sorted chronologically

>>4897821

ok not obvious per se but i think it’ll “click”

the best solutions are simple, elegant that’s why they’re hard to find bc your brain wraps itself around itself looking for complexity and misses it

i just need to see everything in order

>>4897850

kek tomorrow is today

oh shit

TOMORROW IS TODAY

does Q ever mention the present? why is it always future and past?

MAYBE FUTURE AND PAST ARE NOT TO BE TAKEN LITERALLY BUT CODE which will make sense once we figure out the relationship between present past and future posts aka deltas

i’m losing it i sound like a lunatic it’s 4am my time but think about it! sleep on it!

>>4897872

dude it’s not that simple

my data has to be cleaned up there are dates and hours in it

6,000 tweets and over 2,000 drops or something? if it was that easy this thread wouldn’t exist

>>4897872

right now date hour minutes seconds and content of the tweet is in one cell

and i don’t even have raw data for the q posts

and there’s no way to sort it by minutes on the site codefag in this bread made

>>4897886

no no i’m not even looking for them they find me!

>>4897895

i want to ignore hours completely

>>4897906

i posted it like 3 times in here!! search my id im ohonefagging and 73% asleep

>>4897923

>>4897923

idk what the difference between mm and min is but YES ALL I NEED IS THAT ONE COLUMN >>4897927 go make what 100%? spreadsheet is on google docs on an anonymous email

>>4897927

and thank you!!

sorry for shitting up the bread, everyone

>>4897902

>>4899174

>https://ufile.io/4tdl2

anon i'm using excel online and sorting by minutes isn't happening

>>4913153 ok thank you this comes closer to what i needed but the seconds are seemingly random..?

can you make it sort by minutes and THEN by seconds? idk why i need it that way but it makes more sense to me

and can you do the same thing with the q drops?

like a sheet for each and then a sheet with both

>>4957494

lmfao

>>4951767

who invited the tranny