>>4991308

SequenceAnon checking in. Took some time off here to go back to read Q posts re the MAP.

Am not a clock fag and take neutral stance re Clockwork. I do feel they have at the very least been doing a great job watching time stamps and keeping them in discussion.

As regards QPost numbers, it appears that only the timing of the post has importance to Q, to be on either a schedule or some other number significance.

Just observed, I think it was QPosts 165 and 166, Q reposted 165 as 166, to stay organized I think. Sorry, phonefagging from memory here. Mystery to me, unless Q wanted to associate the new timestamp when re-posting that post.

That may be of importance, when the time comes, as Q says.

Having said that, let me just say this (and it is in agreement with you), Q is silent about post #s.

Observe, Q never gave any instructions to number the posts in the graphic/map.

Anons have given QPosts numbers to facilitate discussion of posts and it is a useful tool but it should be left at that.

There appears to be no importance to the number of columns in the graphic. I say this because, going back, way back to the posts on Pol, Have seen Q approve the map with only 3 columns as well as 6 columns.

I only mention this because an Anon above was discussing the possible importance of breaks in the columns.

Q only expressed concerns when time stamps are not all in the same time zone.

Anyone collecting stringers? I think Q said learning to read the stringers is important. May be predictive.

Will go back and try to collect.

P.S. Has anyone else here noticed that on Qmap.pub the owner's headings can be misleading when he describes the post? For example, he described the map as being 50% complete when Q was saying Map 1/2 complete. A reading of the post and discussion on Pol revealed Q was actually saying that the 1st and 2nd maps posted were confirned. Recommend a caveat, the posts are described by owner, who may not understand the post.

SequenceFag out.

>>4961364

Your question on when does it run out reminded me of something I noticed about the time stamps on some of Qs posts.

Am phonenefagging this but will try to collect some examples to post later.

In some of the Q posts, the hour will match the date or delta?. Then pay attention to the minutes and seconds. Often the minutes and seconds will be a sequence of 2 numbers descending. This might be indicative of the number of days counting down.

For instance a post on 12/17 with a time stamp of 17:10:09. (I just made the date up here- NOT referring to any specific post!)

Pay attention to the min/secs.

Look for 30:29; 13:12; 15:14; 10:09 sequences of the minutes and seconds. Could be like when your mom or dad says you have 10 seconds to begin cleaning your room and then they say, "10, 9…" indicating a countdown.

Going to research this but I have to go back to original Pol posts and will take me some time.

Try to see if you guys notice this too.

>>4998195

SequenceFag linking to my own post but was looking for a "countdown" timestamp and came across the famed watch post#2647 and the preceding 2626 and 2627 "clock is ticking" posts. Actually #2627 caught my eye first with its "countdown" timestamp of "3:14:15…"

Post #2626 happens to say, "the clock is ticking," with a time stamp of 3:11:25. To me, this screams "Mark!" and when someone says, the clock is ticking, what hand on the do you "mark", as in mark my word? The second hand position? 25?

Add to that marked seconds position(25) the countdown sequence of 3 minutes and "…14,15" adding "14 seconds, 15 seconds"

And, Boom! Next thing you know the alarm is going off on the watch in Q post 2647 in which the pictured watch is shown at 3:14:40.