Anonymous ID: b65e22 Feb. 2, 2019, 12:07 a.m. No.4999177   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9288 >>9462

>>4961989

This was my original graphic. I went through every Q post and POTUS tweet and these were the only relevant DELTAs with Q posting first. The subject matter was also relevant. It was just a "coincidence" that it was the 3rd marker. Then arranged them sequentially starting with the earlier and so on… I do not know if the sequence is even important. Only that these are the five "marker" that Q is referring in post #365

Anonymous ID: b65e22 Feb. 2, 2019, 12:43 a.m. No.4999442   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4999288

I've always felt that the twitter timestamps were chaotic. And I have tried to verify these using timestamps that anons attach to /qresearch/. I have double checked so many and proved this to myself. I have been trying to confirm your 2nd [15].