Anonymous ID: 0bb84f Jan. 23, 2019, 12:11 a.m. No.4871401   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1419 >>1441 >>1462

Asked about numbers in a dream LB, still puzzling over that. But Hamilton came up LB and brought to mind this dream.

 

Dream about Hamilton & Q Research Board

 

I often get information in dreams but not very often and only in symbolic form. This dream was sometime after 911. Seems to refer to this exact moment in time and what goes on here in QResearch. Like a pointer.

 

DREAM:

 

I am in a bustling marketplace within a bakeshop. There is a baker and an enormous mound of rising bread on a square wooden table.

 

Then I see a carnival ride with Disney-like teacups with 3 seats arranged in a triangle. You get in, and it goes into a dark area, like a scary ride.

 

On the other side is a bank; has a 1776-ish feeling. For some reason, two things come to mind: Alexander Hamilton and $25,000.

 

I must make a decision: to be involved or not. I guess I say no (although I don't remember it). I am returned to the marketplace, but now it is all boarded up and deserted. I try to go to the front of the bank, but it is secured with a very heavy chain.

 

I feel completely desolate. Like it was a failed test. As a result, I never forget this dream. Six months ago, I come onto this board and realize it's all about the American Revolution, bakers, bread (both real and money), and banks.

 

In the last month, "Hamilton" has become a big deal. Why? Many theories. For me, it's a link to the dream.

 

The teacup ride into the dark has something to do with children in danger, I think, and going down the rabbit hole. You can't go into the bank directly, only thru this secret back way.

 

I never knew what the $25,000 meant. Until today. Just add six zeros: $25,000,000,000. The price of the Wall.

 

———-

Interested in any thoughts you have, anons. Can be for a larger group at times.

Anonymous ID: 0bb84f Jan. 23, 2019, 12:16 a.m. No.4871436   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1460

>>4871419

thx anon. Have done a lot of dreamwork myself, but often find it of use to get other perspectives. It's the pointer part that intrigues me. 15 years or so, and this is the specific moment it points to.

Anonymous ID: 0bb84f Jan. 23, 2019, 12:21 a.m. No.4871455   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1470

>>4871414

Mindblowing, this graphic. Just posted a dream about this board wondering about some things and this graphic is highly meaningful to me. Can't say much wo self-doxxing. Just thought you'd like to know.

Anonymous ID: 0bb84f Jan. 23, 2019, 12:28 a.m. No.4871490   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1494 >>1499 >>1512 >>1529 >>1856 >>1992 >>2089

>>4871458

Intrigued with the idea that NBC has a $400 investment in Buzzfeed, so here's the rest of the article:

 

[starts with quote from Fox News; italicized]

 

"NBCUniversal invested $400 million in BuzzFeed and the two companies have a “strategic partnership,” raising eyebrows about why the Peacock Network isn’t more transparent when covering the controversial website.

 

"NBC News and MSNBC fawned over BuzzFeed’s now-debunked report claiming President Trump directed his former attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress before the office of the special counsel released its rare statement.

 

"A search of transcripts from both MSNBC and NBC News didn’t turn up any mention of the investment when the news organization covered BuzzFeed’s discredited bombshell. While transcripts aren’t always 100 percent accurate, it’s clear the relationship was not disclosed with any consistency.

 

"I have to admit that I’m a lil shocked by this. You are telling me that the network that employs such news stalwarts such as Chuck Todd, Chris Matthews, Rachel Maddow, and Al Sharpton has not mentioned that have a 400 million dollar coin invested in creators of awesome cat videos??

 

I’m stumped.

 

I can’t tell you how many times Shepard Smith on Fox News will mention that the Wall Street Journal is in bed somehow with Fox News. You can discredit both all you want but at least they acknowledge they are in bed with each other financially.

 

Yet NBC news on Friday went full throttle crazy on the Buzzfeed story until Muller refuted it and Joe and Mika never told the audience that NBC pretty much owned those Buzzfeed hacks. Can anyone blame the public for looking at the shoddy reporting over the weekend and then behind the scenes crap likes this and yell #FAKE@#$%.

 

I didn’t think so.

 

When you are the network that rigged up an explosive for a Dateline story to make it snazzy for T.V. and had to demote your evening anchor for lying about his war reporting experience you might want to try and lift the bar for yourself.

 

If not, just hire back Keith Olbermann and tank the whole network news division. That would be at least entertaining and honest for everyone to watch.

 

>https://www.redstate.com/tladuke/2019/01/22/knew-nbc-400-million-dollar-investment-buzzfeed./

Anonymous ID: 0bb84f Jan. 23, 2019, 12:34 a.m. No.4871524   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1567

>>4871462

Good point about the bank, I didn't think of it that way (why I like to ask others for insights).

 

You are right about going all in. Disney ride was somehow necessary I think (there was a baker with the bread). My problem wouldn't be fun-seeking ; I'm pretty serious. But I might get scared or bogged down in some way. Or it may be like "this is what happens if people don't do what they are called to do." I am ecstatic to be here, even when hard; the chance of a lifetime for all of us, I think. Will attempt to be "fruitful."

Anonymous ID: 0bb84f Jan. 23, 2019, 12:40 a.m. No.4871570   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1601

>>4871512

Well, disseminating the info is a good first step to whatever happens next. How much difference is there, really, between all these corrupt new orgs (whether legally owned by the same parties or not)? People are beginning to see; Bongino is ranting about it like crazy on his podcast.

Anonymous ID: 0bb84f Jan. 23, 2019, 12:51 a.m. No.4871636   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1676

>>4871567

Thx, hadn't occurred to me but likely true. Because dream was around 1776 and that was over 200 years ago.

 

Re your dream: did you think is was about your college education? You are right about pieces of paper. My friend just left her church of 11 years, she said she had to because the pastor just talks about money! Couldn't stay any longer.

Anonymous ID: 0bb84f Jan. 23, 2019, 12:58 a.m. No.4871674   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1693

>>4871601

Yes, we are ALL the press. Awhile ago, when all the tech was changing, I had to decide whether to self-publish or not. Watched a bunch of publisher's/press panels on C-Span. EVERYBODY was whining about how the press was losing out, publishers were losing out. Like they thought they had some special claim to fame. When in reality the profession tends to produce tremendous arrogance and self-importance. Good riddance to most of them!

Anonymous ID: 0bb84f Jan. 23, 2019, 1:04 a.m. No.4871709   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1723 >>1729

>>4871676

It's hard to find a truly spiritual group or enterprise on a long-term basis. Even the ones that start well change (because they so often attract people who wish to take advantage). Have been sort of "brought" by life to several very different spiritual groups for different purposes. Would be nice to settle down, in a way, but it never works. Must follow where the spirit leads. Led here, not at ALL what I expected!

Anonymous ID: 0bb84f Jan. 23, 2019, 1:16 a.m. No.4871772   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4871693

Glad you brought this up–the fact that they have special rights to go places, do things that others do not. Right now, they are "after" conservatives/libertarian, trying to make us sound like crazies, because they can't stand our ideas.

 

But it's not just our ideas. Really, they despise everybody who is not them. They hold themselves to be superior. And entitled to their special privileges.

 

Irony is that this attitude makes them miserable–and they don't even realize it. Yes, stripping their privileges and making them genuinely compete in the battle over ideas is a win-win.

 

Now you just have to figure out best way to make it happen.

Anonymous ID: 0bb84f Jan. 23, 2019, 2:08 a.m. No.4871996   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1999

"The Trump Internet Pounced"

 

Wha, they think we're just sittin' around waiting for the chance to embarrass the Dems?? Why bother when they do such a stellar job all by themselves.

Anonymous ID: 0bb84f Jan. 23, 2019, 2:20 a.m. No.4872046   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4872029

Some of the best diggs are from online discussions; also good for "morale". After I digg for hours–especially when under pressure–I need to come here and check in, meme, do little mini-diggs (for phone fags, etc). Often those mini-diggs turn into maxi-diggs, and I find myself less "comfy" than I planned. Very dynamic way to work. Only thing I don't like is useless fighting and getting caught up really dumb shills.

Anonymous ID: 0bb84f Jan. 23, 2019, 2:22 a.m. No.4872050   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4872045

I kinda feel bad about suggesting something to be removed and would not but you asked for suggestions…..that's true even when I know it's redundant. Anons work hard, may or may not know what's been here or notablized.

Anonymous ID: 0bb84f Jan. 23, 2019, 2:31 a.m. No.4872072   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2080

>>4872056

It was me, anon, not a shill. I have seen several posts on Wisner posted in the last day with similar info. But said I hadn't checked the details (it was close to last call). Baker was looking to streamline, my apologies. Not intended to downplay your work.

Anonymous ID: 0bb84f Jan. 23, 2019, 2:48 a.m. No.4872125   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2145 >>2153

>>4872080

Anon, I felt I owed you this. Tracked down all the mentions of Wisner in the last day. The reason what you posted looked VERY familiar is that it was posted last night–and I nominated it NOTABLE but it didn't get picked up (ghost baker).

 

I'm guessing you were the one who submitted it last night. Ironic?

 

So please accept my apologies. Not personal, anon.

 

>>4859223 notable

>>4859647 not notable (but good)

>>4860226 nominated by me last night for notable; not picked up? (ghost baker)

>>4860471 not notable (but could be)