https://www.wagingpeace.org/protocol-u-s-nuclear-strike/

PROTOCOL FOR A U.S. NUCLEAR STRIKE

By Bruce Blair|February 28, 2018

This article is part of a series from the November 2017 Harvard University conference entitled “Presidential First Use: Is it legal? Is it constitutional?

The current US protocol for deciding whether to launch a nuclear strike—developed in the early 1960s, with the advent of intercontinental ballistic missiles—has two main functions and virtues: first, it concentrates the power and authority over the use of nuclear weapons in the presidency, at the highest level of the executive branch of the US government, thus keeping it out of the hands of the military and others. Second, it enables the president to respond rapidly and decisively to a nuclear attack by an enemy whose missiles may fly from one side of the planet to the other in 30 minutes; or whose missiles launched from submarines in the oceans may fly to targets in the United States in 15 minutes. It’s critical to have a protocol that allows the president to consider the use of nuclear weapons and, if necessary, to order their use, and to have the process of implementation begin in a very, very short period of time.

If we are under attack, the president is going to have to consider his options in about six minutes, …more on site…

>>4871710

>>4871711

https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/latest-links/ai-cracking-open-vaticans-secret-archives/

Sam Kean writes: “The Vatican Secret Archives is one of the grandest historical collections in the world. Located within the Vatican’s walls, the VSA houses 53 linear miles of shelving dating back more than 12 centuries. That said, the VSA isn’t much use to modern scholars, because it’s so inaccessible. But a new project could change all that. Known as In Codice Ratio, it uses a combination of artificial intelligence and OCR software to scour these neglected texts and make transcripts available for the first time

…more at site

PROTOCOL FOR A U.S. NUCLEAR STRIKE

By Bruce Blair|February 28, 2018

This article is part of a series from the November 2017 Harvard University conference entitled “Presidential First Use: Is it legal? Is it constitutional?

The current US protocol for deciding whether to launch a nuclear strike—developed in the early 1960s, with the advent of intercontinental ballistic missiles—has two main functions and virtues: first, it concentrates the power and authority over the use of nuclear weapons in the presidency, at the highest level of the executive branch of the US government, thus keeping it out of the hands of the military and others. Second, it enables the president to respond rapidly and decisively to a nuclear attack by an enemy whose missiles may fly from one side of the planet to the other in 30 minutes; or whose missiles launched from submarines in the oceans may fly to targets in the United States in 15 minutes. It’s critical to have a protocol that allows the president to consider the use of nuclear weapons and, if necessary, to order their use, and to have the process of implementation begin in a very, very short period of time.

If we are under attack, the president is going to have to consider his options in about six minutes, …more on site…

>>4872054

Oops ignore second part… don’t know why that stayed on

>>4872064

Haha you are correct!!! Jax beach and north Jacksonville fl are just like that! Two diff worlds, Jax beach= smart people, north Jax = way NOT so smart leaning towards inbred