satanic gibberish
I suggest you read "A Woman Rides the Beast".
The papacy is the Woman.
The Beast in this context is the Antichrist's Kingdom.
This Antichrist.
The Scriptures profile this dictator’s reign of terror. Due to his anti-God, anti-Christ policies, Evangelical circles customarily refer to him as the Antichrist.
The Bible mentions this title only once in the Scriptures. The Devil enters this man’s body and wreaks havoc on the world. His reign ignites the Battle of Armageddon (Is. 14:12; Ezek. 28:3-4).
Evidencing this leader’s significance, over thirty titles relate to him in both the Old and New Testaments. These include:
Ps. 5-6 The Bloody and Deceitful Man
Ps. 10:2-4 The Wicked One
Ps. 10:18 The Man of the Earth
Ps. 52:1 The Mighty Man
Ps. 53:3 The Enemy
Ps. 74:8-10 The Adversary
Ps. 111:6 The Head of Many Countries
Ps. 140:1 The Violent Man
Is. 10:5-12 The Assyrian
Is. 14:2 The King of Babylon
Is. 14:12 The Sun of the Morning
Is. 16:4-5 The Spoiler (also in Jer. 6;26)
Is. 22:25 The Nail
Is. 25:5 The Branch of the Terrible Ones
Ez. 21:25-27 The Profane Wicked Prince of Israel
Dan. 7:8 The Little Horn
Dan. 9:26 The Prince That Shall Come
Dan. 11:121 The Vile Person
Dan. 11:36 The Willful King
Zec. 11:16-17 The Idol Shepherd
2 Thess. 2:3 The Man of Sin
2 Thess. 2:3 The Son of Perdition
2 Thess. 2:8 The Lawless One
Rev. 9:11 The Angel of the Bottomless Pit
John 5:43 Another Coming in His Own Name
Dan. 8:23 The King of Fierce Countenance
Matt. 24:15 The Abomination of Desolation
Dan. 9:27 The Desolator
Ezek. 28:12 The King of Tyre
Jer. 4:6-7 The Lion
Jer. 4:6-7 The destroyer of the nations
Revelation 19:20
But the beast was captured, and with it the false prophet who had performed the signs on its behalf. With these signs he had deluded those who had received the mark of the beast and worshiped its image. The two of them were thrown alive into the fiery lake of burning sulfur.
From your remarks, you appear to be preparing the world for the Antichrist, whom you deny exists, to destroy the Whore of Babylon, the papacy.
Also, the very notion of existing "Protestants" is a figment of the Vatican's imagination and hubris.
We are born again Christians.
We are heirs to the other born again Christians who escaped the claws of the papacy for the past 1700 years.
We do not call ourselves "Protestants".
All of the Protestants were Catholics, including Martin Luther, a Catholic friar, and all of them are dead.
"Protestant" is a psyop by the Vatican to pretend they are at the heart of Christendom, rather than the truth.
That they have no part in Christ, and no part in the Kingdom of God.
>You are in error. There is more than one verse that refers to the anti-Christ directly and a great many that refer to this power indirectly.
One place, and only one place, where the antichrist is called The Antichrist. The Gospel According to John.
1 John 2:18[ Deceptions of the Last Hour ] Little children, it is the last hour; and as you have heard that the Antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come, by which we know that it is the last hour.
There are billions of antichrists, as detailed here. How does one number among the antichrists? John tells all, here.
1 John 2:22Who is a liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist who denies the Father and the Son.
How else is the Antichrist spoken of in the bible?
Detailed here.
>The very name protestant means they protested the errors of Roman Catholicism.
They were all CATHOLICS, protesting the CATHOLIC church.
What they did, created what the papacy calls "Protestant" churches.
Born again Christians do not run around protesting the Vatican.
Little pink bunnies do, at the bequest of the Antichrist.
Javier Solana.
Born Again Christians Were Never Part of Rome.
Jesus wrote 7 letters to 7 churches as detailed by John the Revalator.
Did Jesus write a letter to Rome?
No?
Did not Jesus know that "Rome is the one true church I started"?
No?
All of the "Protestants" were Catholics.
They're all dead for over 400 years.
Get a new boogeyman.
None of the 30+ titles for The Antichrist fit "the papacy", gay little bunny.
None of them.
Man with fierce countenance.
Man of Sin
Son of Perdition
Bloody and Deceitful Man
Man of the Earth
The Violent Man
The Prince that shall come
The Vile Person
Now shoo.
Javier wants you somewhere else.
My claims were never answered.
Just more lies were plastered over the old lies.
Scripture does not identify the man who is The Antichrist, no.
I am telling you who he is, but I am only telling you something you already know.
Because you know who you work for, you and your little bunnie furries.
As the devil does not know the end time has come, the devil has always had an Anchrist and a False Prophet on deck.
If the papacy is the Beast,
If the papacy is the Woman,
If the papacy is the Antichrist,
If the papacy is the False Prophet,
If the papacy is Mystery Babylon,
If the papacy is the Whore of Mystery Babylon,
If it's all "the papacy" to you,
Who is described 30+ ways as a man, The Antichrist, in scripture?
No, the antichrist, your boss, knows that he must destroy the Catholic church, once its usefulness is depleted.
Hence you are tasked, as Jesuits from the inside of the Whore, to lay the seeds of its destruction.
Shoo, furries. EVIL has no place here.
It was responded to.
It was never answered.
There is an Antichrist.
You and I both know who he is.
And so does anyone following this discussion.
Shoo, furries. EVIL has no place here.
>Ps. 5-6 The Bloody and Deceitful Man
The papacy?
>Ps. 10:2-4 The Wicked One
The papacy?
>Ps. 10:18 The Man of the Earth
The papacy?
>Ps. 52:1 The Mighty Man
The papacy?
>Ps. 53:3 The Enemy
The papacy?
>Ps. 74:8-10 The Adversary
The papacy?
>Ps. 111:6 The Head of Many Countries
The papacy?
>Ps. 140:1 The Violent Man
The papacy?
>Is. 10:5-12 The Assyrian
The papacy?
>Is. 14:2 The King of Babylon
The papacy?
>Is. 14:12 The Sun of the Morning
The papacy?
>Is. 16:4-5 The Spoiler (also in Jer. 6;26)
The papacy?
>Is. 22:25 The Nail
The papacy?
>Is. 25:5 The Branch of the Terrible Ones
The papacy?
>Ez. 21:25-27 The Profane Wicked Prince of Israel
The papacy?
>Dan. 7:8 The Little Horn
The papacy?
>Dan. 9:26 The Prince That Shall Come
The papacy?
>Dan. 11:121 The Vile Person
The papacy?
>Dan. 11:36 The Willful King
The papacy?
>Zec. 11:16-17 The Idol Shepherd
The papacy?
>2 Thess. 2:3 The Man of Sin
The papacy?
>2 Thess. 2:3 The Son of Perdition
The papacy?
>2 Thess. 2:8 The Lawless One
The papacy?
>Rev. 9:11 The Angel of the Bottomless Pit
The papacy?
>John 5:43 Another Coming in His Own Name
The papacy?
>Dan. 8:23 The King of Fierce Countenance
The papacy?
>Matt. 24:15 The Abomination of Desolation
The papacy?
>Dan. 9:27 The Desolator
The papacy?
>Ezek. 28:12 The King of Tyre
The papacy?
>Jer. 4:6-7 The Lion
The papacy?
>Jer. 4:6-7 The destroyer of the nations
The papacy?
We hold with these 500 year old teachings.
Gee, that's what the Catholics do.
>until those preventing the rise of the antichrist are taken out of the way
2 Thess. 2
And now you know what is restraining, that he may be revealed in his own time. For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only He who now restrains will do so until He is taken out of the way.
He.
He is taken out of the way.
The Restrainer will be taken out of the way.
The Restrainer is the Holy Spirit of God.
As each born again Christian has the Holy Spirit living within him/her, at the rapture, the Holy Spirit will translate us all into the clouds where Jesus will be there to meet us, and usher us into heaven. He will be taken out of the way, and He will not have the same relationship with anyone else, after the rapture, that He does with the New Covenant believers, but for the 144,000 Elect. Sealed, indwelled, guaranteed.
Mankind has no role in restraining the devil or his cohorts. The least of the demons could slaughter humanity entirely, if not restrained by the Holy Spirit, in a day or so. Likely they would keep us around to be tortured to death in servitude.
Trump can, and appears to be, doing the same thing as the King of Ninevah in Jonah's day.
Repenting of the wicked ways of the past 30 years, and buying us another 40.
All we can do is buy ourselves time.
What God says he will do, he will do.
The rapture will happen when the last person to be saved, is saved.
Not a day sooner, not a day later.
>To say something more relevant to this thread, I agree that Revelation 17:6 points to Rome/Vatican (>>4942176): "And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration." (KJV) You just need to look how hard the Catholic Church worked to prevent common folk having access to the Word of God.
That is correct.
The Woman is Rome.
Revelation 17:18
And the woman whom you saw is that great city which reigns over the kings of the earth.”
The great city that reigns over the kings of the earth (is) was Rome.
More confirmation:
“Here is the mind which has wisdom: The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sits.
The Seven Hills of Rome
Archaeology suggests that Rome began as a confederation of villages on the seven hills of Rome: the Capitoline, Palatine, Aventine, Viminal, Quirinal, Esquiline, and the Caelian.
This is the Antichrist, as opposed to the Woman:
Rev 17
There are also seven kings. Five have fallen, one is, and the other has not yet come. And when he comes, he must continue a short time.
The beast that was, and is not, is himself also the eighth, and is of the seven, and is going to perdition.
The woman, Rome, rides the Beast, the Antichrist/Antichrist's kindom.
The furries in here with the sole bent of destroying the Vatican, imho are Jesuit assassins preparing for this event, in the future:
Then he said to me, “The waters which you saw, where the harlot sits, are peoples, multitudes, nations, and tongues. And the ten horns which you saw on the beast, these will hate the harlot, make her desolate and naked, eat her flesh and burn her with fire.
For God has put it into their hearts to fulfill His purpose, to be of one mind, and to give their kingdom to the beast, until the words of God are fulfilled.
In other words, when the One World Religion hands the people of the world over to the Antichrist, the Antichrist and his Kingdom will destroy the One World Religion with fire from heaven. In one hour.
Nukes.
The reason I disparage these furries is not because of their extensive knowledge of the most evil institution on earth, the Vatican, the Whore of Babylon, but for their service to the Antichrist that is to destroy the Whore.
"These people have believed this for thousands of years, therefore, even if it contradicts the bible, it must be accepted as truth."
Thank you for revealing your Jesuit nature, your illogical appeal to authority, your argument from ignorance, and your duplicitous and disingenous "arguments" against there being an Antichrist.
When we know the number of his name.
666
Recommendation 666
Today, exactly 15 years ago, the Western European Union Assembly proposed the infamous Recommendation 666. The Western European Union was a 10-nation military alliance in Europe, that existed for 15 years, before finally integrating into the EU.
It is relatively well known that the WEU Assembly recommended new powers to Javier Solana, former High Representative of the EU, with this recommendation.
It would be difficult to find something the Jesuit spy organization did not have access to, and likely has exclusive access to the Vatican "secret" vaults.
These people have been in the spy game for thousands of years, and they're advised by spiritual beings that have been around far longer, and to which nothing is secret.
He was born on July 14, 1942, to an influential family in Madrid, Spain – a country bordering the Mediterranean. In his college days, he was kicked out of school because of his participation in anti-NATO demonstrations. His family managed to press the right buttons, and he was allowed to continue his education. He earned his doctorate in physics as a Fulbright scholar at several American universities. While in America he witnessed the demonstrations over Vietnam and civil rights and looks back to these events with fondness.27
But he was afraid to participate because he wasn’t a citizen. While in America he also met and married his wife, Concepcion. After completing his education, he and his wife moved back to Spain. Solana became a professor of solid-state physics at Madrid Complutense University. During his time there, he published more than 30 technical books on the subject. In 1964, Solana joined the Spanish Socialist Party. From there, he rose to become a member of Parliament in 1974. When the Socialists came into power in 1982, he was appointed a Spanish Cabinet Minister. He held a Cabinet position in Spain until 1995, when he was appointed Secretary General of NATO – the organization he once tried to destroy.
Solana had participated in anti-NATO demonstrations in Spain. In fact, Solana’s leftist political activism had been so extreme that he was expelled from Madrid’s Complutense University in 1963.
Javier Solana just happens to be a member of the Spanish chapter of the Club of Rome.
Yeah, Nothing To See Here.
>Solana became a professor of solid-state physics at Madrid Complutense University.
Daniel 11:38
But in their place he shall honor a god of fortresses [god of forces]; and a god which his fathers did not know [modern science] he shall honor with gold and silver [what excellent conductance], with precious stones and pleasant things.
Revelation 13:15
He was granted power to give breath to the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak and cause as many as would not worship the image of the beast to be killed.
Huh. Would you look at that.
The creation of artificial life that can move, talk, and kill people.
Must be Science Fiction.
Nothing To See Here
November 25 1999, while American was about to celebrate Thanksgiving Day, something big did happen – something even I wasn’t expecting. Solana’s already lofty position was made even more powerful. Solana put on his third hat and became the Secretary General of the WEU military alliance. In other words, Solana had now been placed in a position of influence over those “core” 10 Brussels Treaty Powers. He now was the head of Europe’s exclusive military club.
Needless to say, these three positions – High Representative, Secretary General of the Council of the European Union, and now Secretary General of the WEU – made Solana an extremely powerful player in the EU. Solana was not only the head of the most powerful agency in the EU (the Council of the European Union), but he was also the one entrusted with creating and directing Europe’s new Common Foreign and Security Policy. And now he was also in tight with those 10 core nations.
Most powerful man of a 10 unit confederation, you say.
Mixed iron and clay?
Well, would you look at that.
No Democracy Without Peace in Israel
Apr 18, 2019
JAVIER SOLANA
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's Faustian pact with the far right may have clinched him a narrow victory in the latest election, but it has come at the expense of Israel's democracy as well as its security. Those who still yearn for peace have no choice but to keep hope alive and await a generation of more enlightened leadership.
More enlightened, you say?
As in, someone bearing light, you say?
Someone more like, oh, say, this guy?
https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/netanyahu-annexation-west-bank-ends-israel-democracy-by-javier-solana-2019-04?barrier=accesspaylog
Daniel 9:27
Then he [The Antichrist] shall confirm a covenant [peace treaty] with many for one week; But in the middle of the week He shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering.
Huh, that's odd.
The Antichrist and Javier Solana seem to be working on the exact same thing.
The PA’s push for statehood is not only concerned with power lines and labor laws within the Palestinian Territories. It is also taking the PA deeper into key international institutions to drum up international support. In November, Palestinian chief negotiator Saeb Erekat confirmed discussions with United Nations (UN) Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and European Union policy chief Javier Solana regarding a UN Security Council resolution recognizing the independence of Palestine.
By citing the bible?
Yeah, I'll keep doing that.
See, turns out the devil learned to read in the last 6000 years.
And the devil is more than capable of telling his puppets in the Vatican what his plans are.
Go ahead and describe "the papacy" as being described by every single one of these verses.
People are watching.
>Ps. 5-6 The Bloody and Deceitful Man
The papacy?
>Ps. 10:2-4 The Wicked One
The papacy?
>Ps. 10:18 The Man of the Earth
The papacy?
>Ps. 52:1 The Mighty Man
The papacy?
>Ps. 53:3 The Enemy
The papacy?
>Ps. 74:8-10 The Adversary
The papacy?
>Ps. 111:6 The Head of Many Countries
The papacy?
>Ps. 140:1 The Violent Man
The papacy?
>Is. 10:5-12 The Assyrian
The papacy?
>Is. 14:2 The King of Babylon
The papacy?
>Is. 14:12 The Sun of the Morning
The papacy?
>Is. 16:4-5 The Spoiler (also in Jer. 6;26)
The papacy?
>Is. 22:25 The Nail
The papacy?
>Is. 25:5 The Branch of the Terrible Ones
The papacy?
>Ez. 21:25-27 The Profane Wicked Prince of Israel
The papacy?
>Dan. 7:8 The Little Horn
Daniel was talking about Jesus, you said?
>Dan. 9:26 The Prince That Shall Come
Daniel was talking about Jesus, you said?
>Dan. 11:121 The Vile Person
Daniel was talking about Jesus, you said?
>Dan. 11:36 The Willful King
Daniel was talking about Jesus, you said?
>Zec. 11:16-17 The Idol Shepherd
The papacy?
>2 Thess. 2:3 The Man of Sin
The papacy?
>2 Thess. 2:3 The Son of Perdition
The papacy?
>2 Thess. 2:8 The Lawless One
The papacy?
>Rev. 9:11 The Angel of the Bottomless Pit
The papacy?
>John 5:43 Another Coming in His Own Name
The papacy?
>Dan. 8:23 The King of Fierce Countenance
Daniel was talking about Jesus, you said?
>Matt. 24:15 The Abomination of Desolation
The papacy?
>Dan. 9:27 The Desolator
Daniel was talking about Jesus, you said?
The papacy?
>Ezek. 28:12 The King of Tyre
The papacy?
>Jer. 4:6-7 The Lion
The papacy?
>Jer. 4:6-7 The destroyer of the nations
The papacy?
You: We hold with these 500 year old teachings.
Me: Gee, that's what the Catholics do.
That's odd.
Q said EVIL has no place here, yet you say you have a place here.
Whom to believe, whom to believe.
See, as it turns out, Jesus was right. As usual.
When Beelzebub casts out Beelzebub, or in this case, furries casting out the Vatican, the house of satan falls.
You lose.
Game over.
>The throne of Caesar passed to the Papacy, not to the bankers and Knights who serve under the Papacy.
There exists a continuation of the title of Nimrod, builder of the Tower of Babel, "The Greatest Bridge Builder", which has been passed down to us as "Pontifex Maximus".
Pontifex Maximus was the title claimed by the High Priests of the Babylonian Mystery Religion when it relocated to Pergamos, in Jesus' time.
When Pergamos was swallowed by the Roman Empire, the home of satan moved again from Pergamos to Rome, where it remains to this day.
Julius Caesar was so attracted to this title that he took it for himself, and all of the emperors after him also took the title Pontifex Maximus. Julius was assassinated for this.
After the emperors took this title, the Bishops of Rome took this title.
And finally the popes, with Gregory a thousand years ago, took this title.
Pontifex Maximus has been used, continuously, by the High Priest of Mystery Babylon, from Nimrod of Babylon to "Pope" Francis today.
It is the same religion.
>"18 And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock
18 And so I asy to you, you are Petros, and upon this petra
Petros =/= petra
Petros is a masculine word, a man's name.
petra is a feminine word, meaning rock or cliff.
Petros is not the petra.
The biggest liars on earth said it doesn't matter, that Peter's church is the one true church.
Don't believe them.
Yes, who would know the evil of the Vatican better than the Jesuits, or a furrie psyop the Jesuits have online.
Who better indeed.
After all, the Antichrist destroys the Woman, Rome, doesn't he.
It's not your knowledge of how evil the Vatican is that bothers me. That should be apparent to anyone who studies the issue.
It's your refusal to bend the knee to Christ Jesus.
That's a problem.
Of course the papacy is antichrist.
As you are antichrist.
As your furries are antichrist.
As your Jesuit handlers are antichrist.
As the pope is antichrist.
Everyone who denies Jesus came down from heaven in the flesh is antichrist.
And yet, there is One Antichrist mentioned over 30 times in the bible, and here, >>7575821 you have absolutely and utterly failed to address how all of those descriptors of the Man of Sin are "muh papacy".
Bend the knee, or perish in eternal fire.
What is that to me?
>I have already addressed the issue over and over again.
Not even once, actually.
Now, I wonder.
Who would benefit by spreading the disinfo that there is no Antichrist?
Wouldn't the man who destroys "the papacy" be higher up on satan's ladder than the pope?
Wouldn't the man who destroys "the papacy" be even more evil than the papacy, seeing how he is higher on the ladder than the pope?
Wouldn't the man who destroys "the papacy" be seen as a world leader of unstoppable power, having destroyed "the papacy"?
I can read all of your "we have thought this for 500 years" posts in the dark, as you glow so, so bright.
So, again, to be clear to everyone watching you dissemble about there not existing an antichrist, and that the Jesuits in no way, ever, pinned any of their own wicked deeds on the Jews, this person described in 30 verses in the bible does not exist, because you say so.
This man, decribed herein, does not exist.
Because you say so.
Ps. 5-6 The Bloody and Deceitful Man
Ps. 10:2-4 The Wicked One
Ps. 10:18 The Man of the Earth
Ps. 52:1 The Mighty Man
Ps. 53:3 The Enemy
Ps. 74:8-10 The Adversary
Ps. 111:6 The Head of Many Countries
Ps. 140:1 The Violent Man
Is. 10:5-12 The Assyrian
Is. 14:2 The King of Babylon
Is. 14:12 The Sun of the Morning
Is. 16:4-5 The Spoiler (also in Jer. 6;26)
Is. 22:25 The Nail
Is. 25:5 The Branch of the Terrible Ones
Ez. 21:25-27 The Profane Wicked Prince of Israel
Dan. 7:8 The Little Horn
Dan. 9:26 The Prince That Shall Come
Dan. 11:121 The Vile Person
Dan. 11:36 The Willful King
Zec. 11:16-17 The Idol Shepherd
2 Thess. 2:3 The Man of Sin
2 Thess. 2:3 The Son of Perdition
2 Thess. 2:8 The Lawless One
Rev. 9:11 The Angel of the Bottomless Pit
John 5:43 Another Coming in His Own Name
Dan. 8:23 The King of Fierce Countenance
Matt. 24:15 The Abomination of Desolation
Dan. 9:27 The Desolator
Ezek. 28:12 The King of Tyre
Jer. 4:6-7 The Lion
Jer. 4:6-7 The destroyer of the nations
That man from the bible, he doesn't exist.
Because you say so.
You said the antichrist is "muh papacy".
The pope is not the antichrist.
The pope is the false prophet, the head of mystery Babylon.
Not the antichrist.
The antichrist is this guy.
Revelation 13
He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man: His number is 666.
If it takes wisdom to know the number of the antichrist, what does it take to deny his existence?
Anons can see right through you, furrie.
Nothing you say was "dealt with", was actually dealt with.
If you think Anons are impressed with "pinkbunnies" "research", you really know nothing about Anons.
>That guy is the pope(s).
And just like that, you have no candidate for this second guy.
Revelation 16:13And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs coming out of the mouth of the dragon, out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet.
See that, furrie?
The devil, and the antichrist, and the false prophet of Mystery Babylon, aka the pope as he is now called, and Pontifex Maximus as he has been called since Babylon.
Good luck destroying what your Order of Loyola built. It will succeed.
And you will have served the Antichrist well, as it is destroyed at his direction when it is no longer useful.
As usual, your eschatology is from the same place the devil is from.
The woman is Rome, Rome is Babylon, and the woman is not the pope.
The woman is a city.
Is the pope a city?
He's a false prophet. He died 1300+ years ago, so he's not The False Prophet who is destroyed by The Antichrist, Javier Solana, and his furrie Jesuit buddies who post here, in our future.
>Your ad hominem insults and bitter rhetoric do nothing to prove your assertion that Javier Solana is the antichrist.
You can wait for the reveal, if you'd like. You'll have to survive the first 42 months of the Tribulation, though, while I'll be at the Wedding Feast of the Lamb.
If you can't see that the devil has to have an Antichrist, and a False Prophet, ready to go on a moment's notice, and has for 2000 years, there's really no helping you.
Well, except for God of course, but you've turned your back on God, haven't you.
>Show me where the 2,000 year gap is in Daniel 9:27.
The gap is explained by nothing in prophecy, and as such was a mystery. This is exactly what we find in the revelation from Jesus given to the last apostle, Paul.
“I am made a minister, according to the dispensation of God which is given to me for you, to fulfil the word of God; Even the mystery which hath been hid from ages and from generations…” – Col 1:25-26
Peter offered Israel an opportunity to repent and usher in the final days of prophecy in Acts 3:19-20. When Israel rejected the apostolic offer of repentance, God revealed a mystery of the gospel to send salvation to Gentiles.
“…rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy.” – Romans 11:11
For the past two thousand years we have been living in the mystery dispensation of God’s grace and peace. Prophecy is not being fulfilled during this mystery time regarding Israel and their holy city.
Revealed by Paul, a Christian, and privy to the mystery of which you speak, that Daniel was not.
Who am I kidding.
You don't understand mysteries even as they are explained to you, in painful and short words.
>Thank-you for admitting you have no scriptural support for inserting a 2,000 gap between the 69th and 70th week of Daniel.
As usual, you lie, and your lies are obnoxious.
I explained that Daniel was not given the time frame between the 69th and 70th week, but Paul was.
See, Daniel was a Jew, and the "gap" is a Church Age, which Daniel, and you, did not participate in.
But which Paul did.
And revealed it by direct revelation from the risen Christ Jesus.
See, the Church Age, of which you are not a beneficiary, was ordained so that Jesus would be the first among many brothers. To build up the Family of God.
Of which you are not a part.
And therefore, do not understand.
Admitted?
Tell me, little pink furrie.
Where does the bible say "If Daniel didn't know about it, it doesn't exist"?
Is Daniel the only person God ever talked to?
As far as your preterist bullshit is concerned, when did Jesus rule and reign on the planet for a thousand years?
How did the Revelation, written in 96 AD and telling of the things that will be, suddenly be over in 70 AD?
When was the Sheep and Goat judgment, again?
No, you demonic Jesuit acolytes have no answers that comport to the Word of God, so you rely on "Protestants have thought this for 500 years!"
Giving away your illogical and unthinking appeal to authority to men, and not to the Word of God.
If the Jews had accepted Jesus as their messiah, there would have been no Church Age, and no "gap".
The Jews, as God knew, did not accept Jesus as their messiah.
Hence, as Paul revealed in yet another mystery, salvation was always for all mankind, and not for the Jews only.
I know you're a reprobate, but you might want to consider the retirement plan the Lord has for you, repent, and be saved.
An honest reader will not I have not once, ever, defended the papacy, the Vatican, the pope, etc.
I just find it very bizarre that people like you, Jesuit trained, outing all of the evil of the Vatican, deny the existence of the Beast, the Antichrist, who actuall does destroy the Vatican.
>Since there is no scriptural support for futurism, it is unbiblical, it is a simple but diabolical deception. It destroys the continuity between the old and new testaments by removing the mathematical proof that Christ confirmed the covenant as the promised seed of Abraham. It also points the finger away from the true anti-Christ (papacy) and has everyone scouting the horizon for an imaginary one.
This is what you wrote.
You call "futurism" what the bible calls "Prophecy".
>There is no scriptural authority, nothing in the word of God, that says insert 2,000 years here and have the next line be fulfilled by the anti-Christ. The subject is identified as the Messiah (Christ) and the 70th week follows the 69th with no gap.
This is the definition of preterism. That everything was wrapped up by 70 AD.
The 70th week of Daniel has some important milestones.
Tell me, furrie, when did all of these things happen, again?
“Seventy weeks are determined
For your people and for your holy city,
To finish the transgression,
To make an end of sins,
To make reconciliation for iniquity,
To bring in everlasting righteousness,
To seal up vision and prophecy,
And to anoint the Most Holy.
Are we now living with no sin?
Are we now living under everlasting righteousness?
Is all vision and prophecy sealed up?
Or do you think maybe there's some more prophecy in the bible that hasn't happened yet?
No born again Christian calls themselves and other born again Christians "protestants", and no Christians believe something prior Christians believed, if it contradicts the bible.
sola scriptura