First of all, Dave Hunt and his views were covered already. I linked and commented on his his video above where expounds on his book "A Woman Rides A Beast" (which I have read.) >>4950932
You have said:
>The Bible mentions this title only once in the Scriptures.
You are in error. There is more than one verse that refers to the anti-Christ directly and a great many that refer to this power indirectly. This list while not complete exposes your error - https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Antichrist
To anyone with even a cursory knowledge of history this statement of yours is absolutely ridiculous.
>All of the Protestants were Catholics
The very name protestant means they protested the errors of Roman Catholicism. Many even chose to die cruel deaths for refusing to accept popery. Granted, some of the great protestant reformers like Luther, Calvin, and Knox started off as Catholic clerics before becoming protestants. I have already commented on that here >>6872430
Even way back here near the start of the thread >>4942093
Protestants broke with Rome not only over doctrinal differences but because they believed the papacy fulfilled the prophecies of anti-Christ. It is not a secret, you will even find that in common public sources like Wikipedia
"The Protestant Reformers tended to hold the belief that the Antichrist power would be revealed so that everyone would comprehend and recognize that the Pope is the real, true Antichrist and not the vicar of Christ. Doctrinal works of literature published by the Lutherans, the Reformed Churches, the Presbyterians, the Baptists, the Anabaptists, and the Methodists contain references to the Pope as the Antichrist, including the Smalcald Articles, Article 4 (1537),[28] the Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope written by Philip Melanchthon (1537),[29] the Westminster Confession, Article 25.6 (1646), and the 1689 Baptist Confession of Faith, Article 26.4. In 1754, John Wesley published his Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament, which is currently an official Doctrinal Standard of the United Methodist Church. In his notes on the Book of Revelation (chapter 13), he commented: "The whole succession of Popes from Gregory VII are undoubtedly Antichrists. Yet this hinders not, but that the last Pope in this succession will be more eminently the Antichrist, the Man of Sin, adding to that of his predecessors a peculiar degree of wickedness from the bottomless pit." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicist_interpretations_of_the_Book_of_Revelation#Antichrist
Millions were tortured and martyred by Rome for protesting their false doctrines and corruption. Conservative estimates are that over 50 million were killed. Not even counting the brutal inquisitions, many large military conflicts between protestants and catholics are a fact of recorded history - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_wars_of_religion
This post has an embedded video and commentary with quotes. Several such historically oriented posts have been made. Perhaps you should read the previous posts in this thread before commenting? >>4928585
"Every Reformer, without exception, spoke of the papacy as Antichrist" - R. Allen Anderson, Unfolding the Revelation, p.137
“Wycliffe, Tyndale, Luther, Calvin, Cranmer; in the seventeenth century, Bunyan,
the translators of the King James Bible and the men who published the Westminster and Baptist confessions of Faith;
Sir Isaac Newton, Wesley, Whitfield, Jonathan Edwards; and more recently Spurgeon, Bishop J.C. Ryle and Dr. Martin Lloyd-Jones;
these men among countless others, all saw the office of the Papacy as the antichrist.”
Taken from All Roads Lead to Rome, by Michael de Semlyen. Dorchestor House Publications, p. 205. 1991.
You should download the free PDF here see who christian leaders believed was anti-Christ (chart) - https://pinkbunnies.club/whiterabbit/file/30/reformers-interpretations-of-anti-christ