THE SHAPE OF THE EARTH - A TRUE PARADOX
The earth MUST be a planet. The sun stays the same size as it comes and goes, so does the moon, therefore, fixed distances. Then add astronomy to that. Simple simple.
The earth MUST also be flat. You can send a laser or a zoom lens across water as far as you would like with no noticeable drop or curve, ever. No architecture accounts for the curve; bridges, canals, skyscrapers, nothing. Datum lines are always used. Simple simple.
So, what's incorrect/incomplete? Optics or Astronomy? Both?
What about neither?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation_hypothesis
Try not to let it fuck you up, and please correct me if I'm wrong on any details.