Anonymous ID: 23955a Jan. 26, 2019, 1:45 p.m. No.4919543   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9579 >>9685

>>4918938

Just saw this on twatter and was about to post it. Glad the author did it instead. Great work, anon.

No idea if this will go down, but it does make a lot more sense in context of the actual regulations that I read than the original theory that was floating around.

>>4919331

>why give them any separation check at all?

With you in theory, but we're talking about a group of workers that have effectively held the entire country hostage with their intrasingence & subterfuge and the gaslighting motifs that has developed around them. We should be open to ideas to get them out with the minimum of long-term damage possible.

Anonymous ID: 23955a Jan. 26, 2019, 1:57 p.m. No.4919637   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4919579

don't disagree, then again i didn't agree with giving them back pay for those that stayed at home for a month either. (those that worked without pay should receive their pay). and still people were crying about it like the sky was falling.

shit's complicated.