Ok I will ask the obvious question:
Who is the new Hitler?
How do you know this person is the New Hitler?
Do you simply use the smear of the new Hitler to justify who you want to eliminate?
I did not assert you named a name.
You posited a premise.
If you will not name your new Hitler then I will simply disagree particularly because who is the new Hitler is purely subjective.
But don't pretend you don't have someone in mind.
What the hell does that have to do with Hitler?
I have a history degree moran
We must force these frauds into the actual courts of law.
Propaganda thrives in political space
Again, I never said what you assert.
I never claimed that someone like Hitler cannot rise again.
What I will say is that it is not your job to decide WHO is Hitler.
And when you recognize him neither you nor I will do anything about it.
Unless you are willing to take yourself out in the process.
But you already have failed
You had years to take out a truly iniquitous traitor and you did NOTHING
And, of course, the ultimate arbiter are the PEOPLE
If they will not accept an opinion - it will not stand
The burden of proof resides with the party who makes the original claim fren
That is not your original claim
The original claim is nothing but a virtue signal.
It holds the equivalent intellectual weight of saying:
Dog shit stinks
Let's outlaw dog shit
Stupid