>>4983015

NOTABLE, OF COURSE

Perhaps a thicker sauce?

>>4983095

That was me, anon: you misinterpreted what I said.

I clarified to the other anon pb I was referring to the amount of 2017 anons present that perhaps get drowned out in the flood we have here and seem to be missing, as a previous anon was asking.

Excellent write-up, though. I'm always looking for ways to measure an EXACT audience count here.