Could the recent late term abortion play an angle in RBG’s replacement?

Here’s my logic: Trump replacing RBG will trigger the “will Roe v. Wade” be overturned question. Normally this would bring out the “reasonable” talking heads saying repealing Roe would result in “coathanger abortions, more deaths, danger to women, etc.” - key is the arguments they make could be seen as reasonable by the average American. After all, these arguments worked in the past and the appear to be REASONABLE.

By rebranding abortion controversy away from “womens’ health” to “killing 3rd trimester babies” from, it positions the controversy from the pro-choice crowd to a position repugnant to the average American. The louder the pro choice left cries for a like-minded SCOTUS replacement to NOT overturn Roe v Wade, the more they’ll be seen by the average American as supporting infanticide due to Trump’s / Q’s branding. Bottom line what was once seen as reasonable by the average American becomes UNREASONABLE.

>>5003196

>>5003160

True. My take is the it worked (and still can) if you position the victim focus on the woman. We NEED to offer these services because it’s required for HER health and well being.

Regardless if this is right or wrong, it sells - i.e. it can be accepted by the average American.

By rebranding/reframing abortion away from women’s health (resonable) to infanticide (unreasonable), you start to position the average American as seeing an attack on abortion rights as a positive thing vs a negative thing.

That’s the tie in to RBGs replacement. The left will go ballistic over the pro-choice question and the average American will be replulsed both by what they now perceive as abortion/infanticide as well as that the left is actually supporting it.