Anonymous ID: 0c606c Feb. 3, 2019, 10:51 a.m. No.5015515   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5526 >>5844 >>5873 >>5906 >>6190

>>5015448 - reposting previously nominated notable.

>>5014963 (lb)

 

Summary of 1957 interview with Margaret Sanger for anons. Interview is about birth control and not abortion.

 

  • Birth control was a dirty word back in the early 1900s.

 

  • Sanger's crusade broke up her first marriage.

 

  • She came from large family. 11 children.

 

  • Trained nurse.

 

  • Women wanted birth control.

 

  • Father was a village atheist.

 

  • Sanger and siblings were called "children of the devil."

 

  • Sanger says she is a humanitarian and doesn't like to see people suffering.

 

  • "Where is the man to give me what the movement gives in joy and interest and freedom."

 

  • Says population control was a motivation.

 

  • Birth control to keep population static.

 

Same Malthusian Argument that Humans are the problem. We see this today via climate change.

 

  • Wallace says that Church's position is that birth control violates a natural law.

 

  • Sanger brings up Church is celibate and does not know marriage.

 

  • Sanger blames Christianity for the smudge on sex.

 

  • Sanger defends homosexuals for being born that way. Not all are perverts.

 

  • Wallace brings up federal funding of birth control. An issue back then.

 

* "I think the greatest sin is bringing children into the world that have disease from their parents. That have no chance in the world to be a human being, practically. Delinquents. Prisoners. All sorts of things. Just marked when they're born.

 

  • Sanger's clinics offer marriage counseling.

 

  • Wallace asks if women are neglecting marriage by wanting to have a career.

 

Looks like the whole marriage counseling thing was being pushed way back in 1957 as an alternative to children keeping the family united.

Anonymous ID: 0c606c Feb. 3, 2019, 11:03 a.m. No.5015646   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6156

>>5015607

WRONG.

The point they're making is that the cells are no longer taken from fetuses but are cell lines that originated from fetus cells.

Meaning, they once took them from fetuses and have been cultivating them in the lab since then.

Reading comprehension, anon. Not a slide.

"Some food companies ARE USING cell lines derived from human fetuses."

Anonymous ID: 0c606c Feb. 3, 2019, 11:30 a.m. No.5015919   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5943 >>5967 >>6128 >>6167

>>5015756

Welfare benefits for single parent with two children.

Pic taken from WaPo. Sorry for shit sauce but normies accept it.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2014/12/05/grothman-single-parents-welfare/?utm_term=.bc057731f99e

Anonymous ID: 0c606c Feb. 3, 2019, 11:37 a.m. No.5016009   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5015967

Yes, this is why welfare is the modern plantation. Same problem the South faced when considering freeing the slaves. WTF were the slaves going to do for a living.

Great example of why these welfare moms are on the modern plantation.

Now the plantation is an equal opportunity plantation with whites becoming slaves in increasing numbers.

Runaway Slave is worth the few bucks to watch. Pic related.

Anonymous ID: 0c606c Feb. 3, 2019, 11:38 a.m. No.5016029   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5015808

Anon sent an email to Brad Parscale's company website.

It would be great if anons on twatter could promote this to key figures in our movement.

Need to get the word out.

Anonymous ID: 0c606c Feb. 3, 2019, 11:42 a.m. No.5016071   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5015873

Bigger sin might be to bring children into this world in order to receive a welfare check.

Even greater sin would be a government program that incentivizes women to do just that.

Perhaps even greater sin is the intentional dumbing down of America.

But the greatest sin of all is murdering unborn babies via late term abortions.