>>5015856

Just noticed T_Wash in this poster.

See Q post 2398, 11/3/18:

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.387 📁 Nov 3 2018 14:09:12 (EST)

[D] Party Con:

When you can't raise money 'organically' through party (individual) donations (voter base) YOU STEAL IT from the American taxpayer and give it back to yourself in the form of campaign contributions.

[Example 1]

Planned Parenthood

https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-18-204R📁

$1.5 billion provided in taxpayer funding over 3-year period.

[Case 1]

PP spent $30 million [disclosed - real estimates close to $65 million] in taxpayer subsidies to influence the outcome of the 2018 midterm elections.

[Conclusion]

Should it be legal for a taxpayer [D+R+I] funded organization to donate massive amounts of money to the D party in an effort to sway an election?

D_insider_term: T_WASH

Re_read drops re: Soros & taxpayer funding

YOUR HARD EARNED TAX DOLLARS AT WORK.

VOTE! VOTE! VOTE!

Q

Did we miss something here, back then?

>>5015919

I don't mean this as a defense of welfare moms, but you have to realize that if you take away ALL of these benefits, she would have to get a job she could never ever qualify for.

She has no education, connections, attire, class, or way to get to work.

Once welfare, always welfare. And some of these chicks would like to break free.

We all make bad mistakes early in life.

She is stuck for good. Know no other way of life. And all the asshole programs libs throw at her will not help her at all.

Plus she gets free meds for herself and the kiddies. Perpetuates the whole scheme.

>>5016098

60 (sixty years ago)

>>5016183

BAKER

Notable

Germans are on!