Didn't see this come up in archives. Thought this was interesting and relevant in light of Robert Redford stepping down/retiring from Sundance recently, and the connect to LDS Church and The Truth and Transparency Foundation (founded by two ex-Mormons, who also founded Mormon Leaks).

Sterling Van Wagenen co-founded The Sundance Institute, is a professor at University of Utah, and is the Academy Award winning director of "The Trip to Bountiful." He is married with six children and 20 grandchildren. He admitted to molesting a 13 year old boy in 1993 during a sleepover at his house.

Criminal charges were never pressed or pursued. Rather, this was apparently mediated through the LDS Church.

There is an audio recording at the YT link (also embedded) of Van Wagenen admitting to child molestation.

https://kutv.com/news/local/lds-temple-videos-director-sundance-co-founder-admits-to-child-molestation-says-website

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sterling_Van_Wagenen

https://truthandtransparency.org/news/2019/2/4/director-of-mormon-temple-videos-and-sundance-festival-co-founder-admits-to-child-molestation-in-early-90s

>>5035905

Redford and Van Wagenen

>>5035981

Caroline's genes are really strong. There's room for error with son, IMHO, but you can really see Caroline in the daughter. I had no idea about the teenagers…. interesting, thanks for sharing anon!

>>5036075

Which Q drop, anon?

>>5035876

>>5035864

The the hat-wearing guy in the crowd with Carolyn, is the one with the closest resemblance to JFK Jr. Vincent Fusca is not that same man in the crowd. The height difference is one indicator, but I think the bigger clue is the facial differences. They can look similar from a distance but the whole thing, no way. The man in the crowd wearing the hat covering his ears… he's the real possibility.

>>5036174

This photo does contain a resemblance but it's not enough, too cropped. But check the YT video anon posted. You can see their faces head on.

>>>>>>5035981

>>5036190

>>5036198

This is apparently deeper than any of us can imagine. To eradicate it in any real sense, the root of the problem must be destroyed. Arrests are a temporary solution to a deeper issue, and the deeper issue is that the people are asleep. Isn't it better to try and strike at the root than to hack away at the branches?

People who are awake are vigilant. People who are asleep are lazy and they are impressionable.

It's like encountering a conflict that's already in play. You have to know the history and genesis of the conflict to know how to approach it. I've seen public altercations where two people are arguing about something, and a third party steps into a progressed fight without knowing where the conflict originated. The third party often allows for the conflict to discontinue but the two angry participants leave it angry. Nothing was resolved. The third party is seen as a do-gooder, but what they really are is a useless busybody.

That is the world we're in right now. A mindless population of do-gooding SJWs who are breaking their own spines to give it all away to illegal immigrants. They are expressing all of their programming and nothing changes if you arrest people because these pathetic idiots will do all they can do break them out of jail.

What does a world of strong men look like?

How do strong men fare in the good times they create?

Are weak men necessary? If so, why are they necessary?

>>5036295

Very true