SAT relays of signal on mobile phone frequencies.

The operation and origination of the project originated in Great Britain with Marconi / GEC. Some 26 individuals were killed, the majority of them between 1986 and 1988, presumably to cover up a development.

Q mentioned [3] dead scientists, indicating that of the deaths at Marconi, only three of them are of significance. Presumably, identifying the [3] scientists will lead to the technology developed, which can then be mapped to modern-day cellular developments.

One project that Marconi was involved with was Satellite communication with submarines and another big project was naval torpedo development, which focuses on acoustics. Both of these involve either Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) and Very Low Frequency (VLF) wave propagation.

We also know that the human brain can be significantly impacted by Electromagnetic Frequencies (EMF), also known as Radio Frequency (RF) signals in the 4Hz to 14Hz range (ELF).

One of the major objections voiced about ELF signals is the length of the antenna required to generate such signals. There are two answers to that. First, note this 1988 thesis from the Naval Postgraduate School that lays out a plan for tethered satellites:

DESIGN OF AN ELF/VLF SATEL~ITXE FOR UNDER THE ICE SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS

http:// www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a202607.pdf

See also,

ELF, VLF AND LF PROPAGATION IN AND THROUGH THE IONOSPHERE

https:// www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-r/opb/rep/R-REP-P.262-7-1990-PDF-E.pdf

Fascinating document if you're interested in that sort of thing. Allows transmissions at massive power from space on ELF and ULF frequencies. Interestingly,

NASA, describe ELF with ranges between the standard 3 to 30 Hz,>0 to 300Hz.and

even, according to WHO, from >0 to 100 kHz. At frequencies this low (>0 to 300 Hz),

"the wavelengths in air are very long (6000 km at 50 Hz and 5000 km at 60Hz), and,

'''in practical situations, the electric and magnetic fields act independently of one

another and are measured separately'''

http:// www.idc-online.com/technical_references/pdfs/electronic_engineering/Extremely_low_frequency.pdf

Also, see this for more on the "Whistler Mode"

http:// vlf.stanford.edu/research/introduction-vlf

END, PART ONE.

>>515502 (You)

SAT relays of signal on mobile phone frequencies, Part TWO.

With Amplitude Modulation, there is a carrier wave and a signal wave. If we have, for example, a carrier wave of 400MHz and a signal frequency of 399.9999993MHz, That produces one sideband of essentially 800MHz and another sideband of 7Hz. The bandwidth of the signal will be essentially 800MHz, which allows for a lot of information to be transmitted.

AM takes a carrier wave (somewhere in the RF Band) and modulates it with an audio frequency signal wave (like your voice) and produces a wide spectrum of frequencies (ranging from the sum of the carrier and audio frequencies to the difference of the carrier and audio frequencies. The information from the audio frequency is completely absent from the middle Carrier portion of the AM signal. All the useful information exists as an identical pair of sidebands on either side of the original carrier signal.

You can get rid of the carrier signal and one of the sidebands and still have all the information that you would need. A practical way to remove everything but one sideband was discovered in 1948 at Bell Labs. Doing that shaved off 2/3 of the required power for the same effective transmission strength. By effectively channeling all your previous AM signal into a single sideband, it was equivalent to tripling your signal power!

At the same time the scientists at Marconi were getting murdered, Motorola introduced the 64000 Digital Signals Processor (DSP) chip and with that analog was dead, long live digital. All the analog signals were being converted to digital and 30 years later analog exists only in minor specific areas.

If a carrier wave is at 400MHz and the Signal Wave is only a few hertz less, the upper sideband is almost exactly the same frequency and carries enormous bandwidth,but the lower sideband is only a few hertz, let's say 7Hz to 10Hz. That's ELF and has the capacity to keep going when the carrier wave and the upper sideband are stopped. The upper sideband in this instance is right at 800MHz, which was mobile phone signal frequency.

The 400MHz carrier penetrates the Ionosphere, the upper sideband is mobile phone frequencies and the lower sideband was perfect for brain entrainment. And with DSP, nobody would ever look for the signal. In addition, this arrangement would allow the ELF signal to penetrate the ocean to a great depth. It would have extremely low bandwidth, but it was capable of "seeing" beneath the surface of either water or land.

More Info:

RFID CHIPS UNDERWATER (same as implants)

https:// www.intechopen.com/books/radio-frequency-identification-from-system-to-applications/rfid-under-water-technical-issues-and-applications

SWALLOWED RADIO TELEMETRY CAPSULES (implants)

https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/221917772_Communication_Strategies_for_Various_Types_of_Swallowable_Telemetry_Capsules

>>520670 (Gen research bread)

<Trying to apply markers in ridiculous ways to point to random anon posts in the bread and convince everyone it's a secret Q poster is a common example of this

This is a shill talking point that attempts to limit the Q team's communication.

Your claim of "random anons" can only be true if the POTUS tweet deltas are random and not planned, which Q has repeatedly proven to be false. Thus your claim of "random anons" is false.

POTUS Tweet deltas are backward looking. If POTUS tweets at 0702 and then again at 0722, that is a 20 minute delta, which means 20 minutes is subtracted from the 0702 time to get 0642 marker. What was posted at 0602? Does it have any bearing on current tasks? Does it provide useful information? Does it correlate to language in the POTUS tweets?

In this situation, the first tweet is 20 minutes after the marker and the second tweet establishing the marker is 40 minutes after the marker. Is the connection between the two POTUS tweets, the delta and the marker established by the delta a coincidence? It is ONLY if the POTUS tweets are random, but Q has proved they are not random, but chosen intentionally.

POTUS Tweets and DELTA

Q specifically mentioned the 0, 1, 5, 10 and 15 minute deltas. Expanding that just a bit you get deltas that are divisible by 5. Thus, these markers are to be looked at for something, whether it be the words and phrases in the POTUS tweets, the spaces or gaps, or perhaps posts on this board. Because such markers are not random.

If the POTUS tweet deltas of 0, 1 and divisible by 5 are not random, then they knowingly point to something the anons are supposed to look at, because the deltas refer to a past time marker. It may be something that isn't for us because Q communicates with others as well, but the anons should be looking at the posts, the words POTUS uses, the spaces, the missing letters, the misspellings, everything associated with these markers. Why?

The Future Proves The Past

Future tweets provide a marker that proves a past point in time. That past point in time is specifically chosen by the timing of both the first and second tweets.

Who are you to say that the markers are not to apply to posts on this board? Q said they would guide us. A reasonable interpretation of that is they'll point in the right direction when the anons get something correct or relevant in order to guide us.

This comms system leaves all other POTUS tweet deltas free. They may or may not point to something on this board because they provide the noise that hides the comms. They may point to totally random things because the deltas don't fall into the specific group of deltas that do provide us with markers. They provide the forest the specific trees are hiding in.

The people who argue against this simple logic are trying to limit the ability of the anons to understand the communication that is happening.