>>5036632 (lb)
>(You)
I didnt see that till after I posted. not intentional but funny anyway.
it's the STFU to the democrats and the SOTU for everyone else.
here is another from the same day
Read Saint Paul Corinthians and there is an explanation in there.
not acting anything. It's a clear definition. He said 'define love' and I referenced a very common definition that dates back 1900 or more years.
nice to see that others are also defining it and you can include them in your list of definitions too.
the clearest definition is in those books.
I always find it curious how much that triggers people?
God is Love. That really bothers a lot of people. It bother me that it bothers them.
for me the level of outrage one gives when confront with Saint Paul's message about love being Patient kind, etc . . . the level of outrage expressed shows me a jaded nature, someone disconnected with what other people think and what motivates them.
Did you know that the Saint Paul bible passage about love is one of the most used scriptures by brides for Catholic weddings?
So you will use a book written last week to define a concept that is older than creation?
I understand the idea of 'subjective' concerning 'ideas' about 'love'. The Love that is defined by Saint Paul, and discussed at lengh, is detailed and living.
But you don't care?
you can point at things that are requested. And then you know it's a shill. But 'define Love' and then it's a shitstorm of indignant shills if you dare give them an honest and ancient authoritative definition.
They elevate 'harry ptter' to the level of 'Epistles of st. Paul'.
and then it becomes them attacking you personally.