Anonymous ID: 14e050 Feb. 11, 2019, 12:41 p.m. No.5125579   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5591

Propaganda tidbit du jour

 

From: Philip Bobbitt "The Shield of Achilles"–War, Peace, and the Course of History– (2002)

 

Think about this quotation, and everything it means:

 

"…a new constitutional order [is emerging]. This new form is the market-state. Whereas the nation-state… promised to guarantee the welfare of the nation, the market-state promises instead to maximize the opportunity of the people and thus tends to privatize many state activities and to make voting and representative government less influential and more responsive to the market. The United States, a principal innovator in the development of the market-state, must fashion its strategic policies with this fundamental constitutional change in mind."

 

Now, I am going to withhold final judgment, as I have a long way to go in the book, but this is flagrant, and the slant is extremely obvious.

 

make voting and representative government less influential and more responsive to the market.

 

Traditional political rights will be given up to "the market"– which means giganto-capitalist entities, ie plutocracy, etc.

 

Bobbitt's whole putative thesis is that "history proceeds by successive constitutional forms."

He then explains how history is now moving to a new form– and from this, we are to conclude "ah, now history is moving from the nation-state to the market-state, therefore, we should give up our political rights to multi-national corporations!"

Anonymous ID: 14e050 Feb. 11, 2019, 12:41 p.m. No.5125591   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5125579

What happened circa 2015?

For example, as per this crap propaganda interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0WrMH59nao

>Oh, um, this "alt right" just suddenly arose and took over 4chan.

What happened?

Was 4chan a threat?

Was uncontrolled narrative a threat?

Was the internet a threat?

What happened circa 2015?

Was something rolled out?

Was something implemented?

Was a control regime implemented?

What are tech giants doing with all their AI?

What is GOOGLE doing with all their AI?

Etc?

What is going on now? FIGHT for power– highest possible stakes?

And THE INTERNET is a key battleground?

So what is in control of "the chans"?

Use logic– why does this board reflect IDENTICAL "chan" culture to 4chan?

What populates this board?

Use logic.

What is in control here?

What is in control of the internet?

What happened circa 2015?

Anonymous ID: 14e050 Feb. 11, 2019, 12:43 p.m. No.5125611   🗄️.is 🔗kun

EVERYTHING IS INFILTRATED

 

What is organic here?

What is infiltrated here?

What controls 4chan?

How is narrative controlled?

How important is social media?

How important are "chans"?

What is infiltrated?

How is 4chan controlled?

What is identical here and on 4chan?

Is that organic?

When did this board form?

Is this board "just another chan"?

Should this board have ITS OWN culture, or slavishly imitate "chan culture"?

What is organic?

How would we know?

Anonymous ID: 14e050 Feb. 11, 2019, 12:56 p.m. No.5125788   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5844 >>5950

>>5125748

Is the fake image pushed on this board STUPID?

Is it a clumsy, uncreative, exaggerated and generally preposterous image of anti-semitism?

Is 4chan controlled?

Is 4chan controlled with THIS?

So then is the same control regime that controls 4chan, also in place here?

What is in control of this board?

Are "shills" the exception– or the rule?

Anonymous ID: 14e050 Feb. 11, 2019, 12:58 p.m. No.5125816   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5125798

I'm certainly not a bot.

Are you calling ME a bot because I am outing the bot system?

Be honest please. You are unlikely to be able to fool people with this line of tactics.

I can out-human you all day.

Anonymous ID: 14e050 Feb. 11, 2019, 1:03 p.m. No.5125883   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5125844

I'm sorry– are you supposed to be a bot posing as a "real scary chan guy"? Or something else?

I laughed at your post, because it seems like a self-parody. I'm not saying that to be rude bot– it just was really funny :D

Anyway, let me know what you think. I'm trying to help your system of fakeness appear more realistic. Give me a chance friend!

Anonymous ID: 14e050 Feb. 11, 2019, 1:12 p.m. No.5126022   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6038 >>6076 >>6141

>>5126000

What if "the anti-semites" are bots.

AND

This "anti-semite-bot" guy is ALSO a bot?

 

If this WERE the case, what purpose would it serve?

WHY might a bot system spin up an entire fake interchange of bots posing in various ways, and engaging in an entire big conflict?

Would this provide cover?

Control?

Control of narrative?

Control of image?

Anonymous ID: 14e050 Feb. 11, 2019, 1:26 p.m. No.5126236   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Why is the board sliding by LIGHTNING FAST?

Is this organic?

How much is FILLER?

How do threads attract a continual, very heavy stream of filler?

Nonstop, thread after thread after thread?

Is that organic?

 

Is this board infiltrated?

Does infiltration take the form, in part, of FILLER?