Honestly this is an amazingly thorough list of dig targets, and frankly where a lot of effort should be directed off of the main board. If the topics are sourced properly, with diligent protection from shilling attacks, quite a few of these could be expected to generate significant shifts and influence of MSM content (which honestly is an under appreciated value of the work done here.)
However, I think this is too broad and inclusive of a list. The topics should be broken out into several boards. This would make them easier to protect, and make the resources & data easier to use (and populate.) For instance, "Media" is a huge topic, with influence & corruption currently only being examined at the highest levels of management. There's tremendous depth to this, particularly when you realized how deeply the influence model goes down into newsrooms and staffs. Same goes for utilization of social media platforms for mass influence, funding, and audience access control. Similarly, historical models of weaponizing mass communication, narrative promulgation and manufacture of consent; all are part of a very complex model going back hundreds (thousands) of years.
So I'd argue for at least three boards, living in parallel.
Though it's a bit more complicated, I