>>5172411 (pb)
>>5172526 (pb)
>As QResearch develops, there's a need not just to collect >individual pieces of data but to go deeper–which is what >happened with the Alabama digg. There are at least 80 posts >and a growing network of interconnections. Just tracking it is a >challenge, but the connections are dynamite. The Muh Russia >narrative is a common denominator for this particular operation.
>Setting up this Info Warfare board gets some of the stuff off of >the much larger QResearch board. We can still use QResearch >for searching but good to have someplace "smaller" and more >defined when digging deeper (and potentially having >discussions).
I totally agree, particularly regarding Alabama. My point is, there's a ton of data/interconnections yet to come; particularly from insiders who are yet to speak up. In the midst of the muhjew, flat earth, arfcom biblefag shill fest; the nuances of this insider data is completely lost. Connections, if they even happen, are thin at best. Worse yet, there's quite a few folks who are looking a the shit storm on the main board and simply walking away. I think with a protected space, better organized, you might be surprised what comes out. Just a guess…but an informed one anyway.
Last thought, then I'll drop it, is the main board has indeed started to become victim to overwhelming shill-placed propoganda landmines. Its become damn near impossible to do good work during the day (compared to even a few months ago.)
Go back a year +, and the mandate (Q-stated even) was dig & meme. In effect produce an opinion shifting effect by mass research and dissemination. That's becoming a lot harder to focus and deploy. The topics you want to cover, support turning that tide, and will do so with those who are major assets if red-pilled. That's why I argue for getting some of it off the main board, in a better organized way. Reverse the flow of content and research, so to speak. Shills and resulting slides aren't going to add to the effort anyway.