the bot system has went retarded again.
It is an endlessly pushed, fake and gay shill garbage.
this link debunks all the shill garbage:
http://talmud.faithweb.com/
oh wait, what's this? all that garbage is taken from the "book" called "talmud unmasked"!
>talmud unmasked, a book published in 1892 by Justinas Bonaventure Pranaitis (1861–1917).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Talmud_Unmasked
The author is the same clown that was exposed as a complete fraud in the Beilis trial.
He was brought over as an "expert", and got completely exposed as a fraud:
>One prosecution witness, presented as a religious expert in Judaic rituals, was a Catholic priest, Justinas Pranaitis from Tashkent, well known for his antisemitic 1892 work Talmud Unmasked. Pranaitis testified that the murder of Yushchinsky was a religious ritual, associating the murder of Yushchinsky with the blood libel, a legend believed by many Russians at the time.
>Pranaitis' credibility rapidly evaporated when the defense demonstrated his ignorance of some simple Talmudic concepts and definitions, such as hullin,[1]:p.215 to the point where "many in the audience occasionally laughed out loud when he clearly became confused and couldn't even intelligibly answer some of the questions asked by my lawyer."[3]
>A Beilis Defense Committee advisor, a writer named Ben-Zion Katz, suggested countering Father Pranaitis with questions like "When did Baba Bathra live and what was her activity" which he described as the equivalent of asking an American "Who lived at the Gettysburg Address?" There were enough Jews in the court for the resultant laughter to negate Pranatis' value to the prosecution.[1]:pp.214-216
KEK!
>A Tsarist secret police agent is quoted, reporting on Pranaitis' testimony, as saying: Cross-examination of Pranaitis has weakened evidentiary value of his expert opinion, exposing lack of knowledge of texts, insufficient knowledge of Jewish literature. Because of amateurish knowledge and lack of resourcefulness, Pranaitis' expert opinion is of very low value.
KEK!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menahem_Mendel_Beilis
oh and here is more:
>The identification of Yeshu as Jesus is problematic. For example, the Talmud mentions Yeshu ben Pandera/ben Stada's stepfather, Pappos ben Yehuda, speaking with Rabbi Akiva,[3] who was executed at the climax of the Bar Kokhba revolt in 135 CE.[4][5] Furthermore, Yeshu the Pharisee student is described as being a student of the second-century BCE nasi Joshua ben Perachiah, as well as being among the exiled Pharisees returning to Israel following their persecution[6][7] by John Hyrcanus,[8], an event which occurred in 74 BC. Additionally, Yeshu the sorcerer was executed by the royal government which lost legal authority in 63 BC. These events would place the lifetime of either Yeshu decades before or after the birth and death of Jesus.[9][10] Still, there are numerous other passages pertaining to an individual named "Yeshu" that either don't provide a specific time period or else specify a time where it is reasonable to assume mentioning of Jesus would even be possible (take for example a notable passage, Gittin 57a mentioning the nobleman Onkelos conjuring the tormented spirit of "Yeshu" – Onkelos lived more than a century after Jesus, thus making it possible the Yeshu mentioned could indeed be Jesus, though the likelihood of this is still questionable) still opening the possibility that whichever Yeshu mentioned might be Jesus. '
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_in_the_Talmud
let the shill kvetching begin!
>In August 1536, Luther's prince, John Frederick, Elector of Saxony, issued a mandate that prohibited Jews from inhabiting, engaging in business in, or passing through his realm. An Alsatian shtadlan, Rabbi Josel of Rosheim, asked a reformer, Wolfgang Capito, to approach Luther in order to obtain an audience with the prince, but Luther refused every intercession.[17] In response to Josel, Luther referred to his unsuccessful attempts to convert the Jews: "I would willingly do my best for your people but I will not contribute to your [Jewish] obstinacy by my own kind actions. You must find another intermediary with my good lord."[18] Heiko Oberman notes this event as significant in Luther's attitude toward the Jews: "Even today this refusal is often judged to be the decisive turning point in Luther's career from friendliness to hostility toward the Jews";[19] yet, Oberman contends that Luther would have denied any such "turning point". Rather he felt that Jews were to be treated in a "friendly way" in order to avoid placing unnecessary obstacles in their path to Christian conversion, a genuine concern of Luther.[20]
>Paul Johnson writes that "Luther was not content with verbal abuse. Even before he wrote his anti-Semitic pamphlet, he got Jews expelled from Saxony in 1537, and in the 1540s he drove them from many German towns; he tried unsuccessfully to get the elector to expel them from Brandenburg in 1543."[21]
>Michael Berenbaum writes that Luther's reliance on the Bible as the sole source of Christian authority fed his later fury toward Jews over their rejection of Jesus as the messiah.[10] For Luther, salvation depended on the belief Jesus was Son of God, a belief that adherents of Judaism do not share. Graham Noble writes that Luther wanted to save Jews, in his own terms, not exterminate them, but beneath his apparent reasonableness toward them, there was a "biting intolerance", which produced "ever more furious demands for their conversion to his own brand of Christianity". (Noble, 1–2) When they failed to convert, he turned on them.[22]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Jews_and_Their_Lies
Luther wanted to convert all the jews. And wrote this garbage cause they didn't follow him.
And as always, it has nothing to do with this:
so it is more lame shill kvetching
while(1) {
wait_for_reply();
if(reply == meme) {
copy_meme();
add_muhjew_keywords();
print_meme(); }
}
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
the spam-bot is deployed again
below you'll find a sample of spambot activity:
garbage from #6609 bread - 18 spam posts
garbage from #6608 bread - 17 spam posts
garbage from #6607 bread - 23 spam posts
garbage from #6604 bread - 33 spam posts
garbage from #6603 bread - 18 spam posts
garbage from #6602 bread - 41 spam posts
while(1) {
wait_for_reply();
if(reply == meme) {
copy_meme();
add_muhjew_keywords();
print_meme(); }
}
the bot talks about boycot, and promoted the bds.
1234134 garbage pasta about AIPAC, 0 pasta about "J-street" the far left "jewish" democrat lobby.
interesting.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
the spam-bot is deployed again
>>5214268 - a sample of spambot activity
you got it all upside down bot operator.
Your bot repeats itself, and I call out the spambot operation.
and now to the final part (my favorite) - a detailed example of a glitch, that proves that it is in fact a (semi automatic) spambot
Look at the attached screenshots. look at the time stamps and then on the post number. Notice that the later post has an earlier post number. THIS HAPPENS WHEN A MULTI-PRONG MESSAGE IS INJECTED
also notice the kvetching of the bot operator.
still no pasta collages about J-STREET!
only AIPAC and a ton of em about aipac. wonder why…
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
the spam-bot is deployed again
>>5214268 - a sample of spambot activity
you got it all upside down bot operator.
Your bot repeats itself, and I call out the spambot operation.
while(1) {
print "goy, kike, moshe, schlomo, rabbi";
wait_for_reply();
if(reply == high_iq) { $myreply = "pilpul";}
else {$myreply = "jidf, what time is it in tel-aviv";}
echo $myreply;
}