recucled shill garbage from the early 20th century. muhjew was used as a decoy/shield tactic then just as now, the oldest trick in the book.
Sources employed
Source material for the forgery consisted jointly of Dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu (Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu), an 1864 political satire by Maurice Joly;[10] and a chapter from Biarritz, an 1868 novel by the antisemitic German novelist Hermann Goedsche, which had been translated into Russian in 1872.[11]
A major source for the Protocols was Der Judenstaat by Theodor Herzl, which was referred to as Zionist Protocols in its initial French and Russian editions. Paradoxically, early Russian editions of the Protocols assert that they did not come from a Zionist organization.[12] The text, which nowhere advocates for Zionism, resembles a parody of Herzl's ideas.[1
Literary forgery
The Protocols is one of the best-known and most-discussed examples of literary forgery, with analysis and proof of its fraudulent origin going as far back as 1921.[14] The forgery is an early example of "conspiracy theory" literature.[15] Written mainly in the first person plural,[a] the text includes generalizations, truisms, and platitudes on how to take over the world: take control of the media and the financial institutions, change the traditional social order, etc. It does not contain specifics.[17]
Maurice Joly
Elements of the Protocols were plagiarized from Joly's fictional Dialogue in Hell, a thinly veiled attack on the political ambitions of Napoleon III, who, represented by the non-Jewish character Machiavelli,[18] plots to rule the world. Joly, a monarchist and legitimist, was imprisoned in France for 15 months as a direct result of his book's publication. Scholars have noted the irony that Dialogue in Hell was itself a plagiarism, at least in part, of a novel by Eugène Sue, Les Mystères du Peuple (1849–56).[19]
Identifiable phrases from Joly constitute 4% of the first half of the first edition, and 12% of the second half; later editions, including most translations, have longer quotes from Joly.[20]
The Protocols 1–19 closely follow the order of Maurice Joly's Dialogues 1–17. For example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion
as for zionists, it is the same as the masons, every powerful organization has rotten apples in it.
basic belief - the repatriation of jews to their ancestral land.
as all powerful organizations, it has a corrupt element, see the difference between "red zionism" (socialists) and the libertarian zionisn (jabotinski)