>>5360049 (pb)
Fortunately, you've still got the voices in your head!
(sorry. not being mean. it was just all tee'd up and impossible to ignore.)
Why can't anons be aware of it without it being "notable"? GMA Today or some shit even picked it up the first time around.
(let that sink in)
nope.
Some universities even had teams of students build gas-free cars and race them, testing for distance, speed, etc.
I think they were solar-powered cars, primarily?
I dunno. It's been a while.
These are the same fucking homos that had a tiered payment system to release their (stolen if real) documents.
Yep. Sounds good.
Eh. If by "prepare" you mean "offer to bring something to the next family get together/pick up the check" and/or "find the one thing you can agree on, acknowledge it, and shift the conversation to that one cousin everyone thinks is just throwing their whole away", then yes.
Prepare.
Whew! Those grammatical errors!
Can't bring myself to click the link bc it might support whatever wrote what's in the the 2nd image.
>5360525
Whew! Those grammatical errors!
Can't bring myself to click the link bc it might support whatever wrote what's in the the 2nd image.
I think proving/convicting online harassment and cyberstalking is entirely possible without impugning anyone's 1st Amendment protections.
Accessing someone's private property without the owner's consent and then using what is accessed (stolen) to intimidate or GodOnlyKnowsWhat is a violation of the property owner's rights, yes?
Who the fuck is this shit biscuit?
Y do you ask?