>>5360785 [Pb]

In a free country, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, + freedom of religion, and privacy:

Substances used to alter your perceptions are banned to the point of forcibly testing your bodily fluids to make sure your mind does not reach a certain level.

What does that say about freedom in the USA?

>>5360898

>>5360880

I would be more into isolating the pure substance from the mold and then standardizing dosage.

Just so I can provide for myself without a doctor.

I have seriously thought of doing this. Probably illegal (DGAF), gotta keep us sick and dependent on big pharma.

>>5360989

What if the first part has always been true and the second is false hope?

Don't get me wrong, I hope you are correct. That doesn't mean we aren't being sprayed with poison.

>>5361102

When is Trump going to break the news?:

"We have the server(s)."

>>5361142

>Any thoughts, anons?

Besides minors, and trafficking involuntary sex slaves, why is consensual sex for money a crime?

Who do we know for a fact has done this and we still respect?

2 consenting adults, one ha$, one has the desired service, exchange is made, both parties pleased.

The crime is banning this activity in a free country.

>>5361389

>They are going to suicide him

Will be a bigger surprise if they don't.