This anons take.

TL;DR: All warfare is deception. Never interrupt your adversary when they're making a mistake. Appear weak when strong. Use a borrowed sword to defeat your enemy.

Why have there been no arrests?

Stage was not set for arrests to be made. True nature of those corrupted had to be exposed publicly and through the actions of the DS. They cannot hide the lies about Russian collusion, fake dossier, etc.

Why have 'specific' dates been mentioned only to see no action?

The dates listed are not important but the action associated with those dates are important so as to preview what is coming without giving away the timeline.

Define 'game theory'.

A mathematical method of decision-making in which a competitive situation is analyzed to determine the optimal course of action for an interested party, often used in political, economic, and military planning. Also called theory of games.

Why must disinformation be provided?

To prevent the enemy from knowing the next move. The Art of War: All warfare is deception.

Define 'open source'.

Intellectual property, especially computer source code, that is made freely available to the general public by its creators.

Define 'public purview'.

n. The extent or range of function, power, or competence; scope.

n. Range of vision, comprehension, or experience; outlook.

n. Law The body, scope, or limit of a statute.

Do we let our enemies walk through the front door?

Yes. Allow them to expose themselves.

Define 'plausible deniability'.

A condition in which a subject can safely and believeably deny knowledge of any particular truth that may exist because the subject is deliberately made unaware of said truth so as to benefit or shield the subject from any responsibility associated through the knowledge of such truth.

Why was it important to FIRST clean house within the FBI & DOJ (public info)?

Clear the stage of corrupt appointees so that those with integrity could be installed and the public would understand they have a Justice Department that is focused on the law.

Why was it important to FIRST clean house within other ABC agencies (non_public info)?

Clear the stage of corrupt appointees so that those with integrity could be installed and to maintain control of classified information and the systems supporting ongoing intelligence missions worldwide.

What are the duties of the FBI?

Operates within the United States to collect intelligence and investigate Federal Crimes.

What are the duties of the DOJ?

Prosecute Federal Crimes as recommended by the FBI.

When does MIL INTEL have jurisdiction?

What vested powers does POTUS have re: MIL INTEL vs. ABC agencies re: matters of NAT SEC (HOMELAND)?

The War Powers Act. The Act concedes the commander-in-chief role gives the President power to repel attacks against the United States and makes the President responsible for leading the armed forces. It provides that the President can send the armed forces into action abroad only by declaration of war by Congress, "statutory authorization," or in case of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.”

Think 'umbrella surv'.

Military Intel provides support to the ABC's under Title 50, U.S.C. POTUS could pull those Forces under Title 10 U.S.C. and use the same capability under the War Powers Act.

What agency does the FBI report to?

DoJ

What is the role of the AG?

The United States Attorney General is the head of the United States Department of Justice per, concerned with all legal affairs, and is the chief lawyer of the United States government. In cases of the federal death penalty, the power to seek the death penalty rests with the Attorney General.

Does the AG oversee the firing of FBI & DOJ senior/mid/lower staff?

U.S.C. Title 28, §508 establishes the first two positions in the line of succession, while allowing the Attorney General to designate other high-ranking officers of the Department of Justice as subsequent successors.

How many FBI & DOJ were FIRED/FORCED?

Don't have this info

Does 'Russia' recusal prevent/block AG from this responsibility?

No.

What time period did this occur?

Who appointed and tasked HUBER?

Who appointed and tasked the OIG?

Who was AG?

Sessions

[zero leaks - none]

Transfer from AG1 to AG2?

Sessions to Whitaker

Why might that be important?

Optics to ensure fairness.

How do you avoid 'politically motivated/attack - obstruction - attempt to block/obstruct Mueller'?

Present the truth with source material to refute false claims

Optics are important.

When are optics not important?

When out of the public purview or when setting the stage?

Think Whitaker.

Define 'stage set'.

(1 of 2)

(2 of 3)

Who recently walked 'on stage' to take command?

Barr

What 'stage' experience did this person have?

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/5684146/William-P-Barr-Written-Testimony-01-14-2019.pdf

Excerpts from PDF below:

First, I believe it is vitally important that the Special Counsel be allowed to complete his investigation. I have known Bob Mueller personally and professionally for 30 years. We worked closely together throughout my previous tenure at the Department of Justice under President Bush. We’ve been friends since. I have the utmost respect for Bob and his distinguished record of public service. When he was named special counsel, I said that his selection was “good news” and that, knowing him, I had confidence he would handle the matter properly. I still have that confidence today.

Given his public actions to date, I expect that the Special Counsel is well along in his investigation. At the same time, the President has been steadfast that he was not involved in any collusion with Russian interference in the election. I believe it is in the best interest of everyone – the President, Congress, and, most importantly, the American people – that this matter be resolved by allowing the Special Counsel to complete his work. The country needs a credible resolution of these issues. If confirmed, I will not permit partisan politics, personal interests, or any other improper consideration to interfere with this or any other investigation. I will follow the Special Counsel regulations scrupulously and in good faith, and on my watch, Bob will be allowed to complete his work.

Second, I also believe it is very important that the public and Congress be informed of the results of the Special Counsel’s work. For that reason, my goal will be to provide as much transparency as I can consistent with the law. I can assure you that, where judgments are to be made by me, I will make those judgments based solely on the law and will let no personal, political, or other improper interests influence my decision.

(break)

Obviously, the President and any other official can commit obstruction in this classic sense of sabotaging a proceeding’s truth-finding function. Thus, for example, if a President knowingly destroys or alters evidence, suborns perjury, or induces a witness to change testimony, or commits any act deliberately impairing the integrity or availability of evidence, then he, like anyone else, commits the crime of obstruction. Indeed, the acts of obstruction alleged against Presidents Nixon and Clinton in their respective impeachments were all such “bad acts” involving the impairment of evidence. Enforcing these laws against the President in no way infringes on the President’s plenary power over law enforcement because exercising this discretion — such as his complete authority to start or stop a law enforcement proceeding — does not involve commission of any of these inherently wrongful subversive acts.

(break)

The principal conclusion of my memo is that the actions prohibited by section 1512(c) are, generally speaking, the hiding, withholding, destroying, or altering of evidence – in other words, acts that impair the availability or integrity of evidence in a proceeding. The memorandum did not suggest that a President can never obstruct justice. Quite the contrary, it expressed my belief that a President, just like anyone else, can obstruct justice if he or she engages in wrongful actions that impair the availability of evidence. Nor did the memorandum claim, as some have incorrectly suggested, that a President can never obstruct justice whenever he or she is exercising a constitutional function. If a President, acting with the requisite intent, engages in the kind of evidence impairment the statute prohibits – regardless whether it involves the exercise of his or her constitutional powers or not – then a President commits obstruction of justice under the statute. It is as simple as that.

(3 of 3) sorry…..so much info

Think Bill Clinton impeachment.

Has the 'stage' been cleaned & cleared for the next performance?

Perhaps not yet but it is being cleaned now and the set is being prepped for a clean stage.

If the 'stage' is clean, can the performance begin?

The stage can be clean but it then needs to be set

How might 'transparency' [DECLAS] fit into the dialogue?

Show that POTUS did not hide, withhold, destroy or alter evidence. But Hussein DID.

Define 'thesis' statement.

A thesis statement usually appears at the middle or end of the introductory paragraph of a paper, and it offers a concise summary of the main point or claim of the essay, research paper, etc. It is usually expressed in one sentence, and the statement may be reiterated elsewhere.

What benefit(s) does this provide BARR?

POTUS has stated numerous times there was no Russian collusion on his part. Declass of FISA proves this. Making Barr's job, given the above statements, easy to clear the stage completely and then set the stage for the next performance.