TY Bakery.
>>5486620 /pB
â–¶Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 03/03/19 (Sun) 13:21:19 8edf77 (2) No.5486620
https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1102227809341181953
Read the comments.
Those still asleep buying the 'narrow' scope 'new narrative' shift.
If the scope memo was never unclassified (v2) how do D's make this statement?
#FactsMatter
Q
**
We have 2 narratives. We are going to need to repair that bridge, the DSM did a number on it.
>>5486620 /pB (Q)
Ted Lieu -
Ted Lieu
‏Verified account @tedlieu
6h6 hours ago
Ted Lieu Retweeted Judd Legum
Unlike the narrow scope of Mueller's investigation, the House Judiciary's oversight mission is broad: did @POTUS committ ANY crimes or misconduct? Our investigation will either exonerate Trump, or it won't. We will follow the facts wherever it may take us.
Lieu was responding to:
Judd Legum
‏Verified account @JuddLegum
House Judiciary Committee to issue document requests on Monday to 60 different people and entities connected to Trump to "begin the investigations to present the case to the American people about obstruction of justice, corruption and abuse of power"
And they should all listen to VoiceOfReason @crjfactsonly
VoiceOfReason
‏ @crjfactsonly
Replying to @jackgo2 @JeffDeCola and
You might want to look up the term “unindicted coconspirator”. Unindicted means not charged. The DOJs Attorney’s Manual specifically states that “it is not desirable for US Attorneys to identify unindicted coconspirators in conspiracy indictments,” so Trump is not named, but…
…the characterization is wrong anyway. Campaign finance laws are different for Cohen than for Trump himself. Cohen being guilty does not necessarily mean that Trump is. And legal experts disagree on whether a sitting pres can even be indicted.
Comments seem to be 50/50 eitherway.
Newer retweat from Lieu:
From Rebeca Ballhaus (lol)
NEW: The House Judiciary Committee this week plans to request documents from: - Allen Weisselberg - Don Jr. - Eric Trump - Rhona Graff - Jared Kushner - Ivanka Trump - John Kelly - Don McGahn and 50+ more. w/@dnvolz
I know, it's super dark to think about.
It's hard to unfool someone who has been fooled!
2010 it was the 99% vs the 1% - how quickly they divided us.
I think Anon's can figure out a way to rebuild the bridge!
Deep state is almost out of steam.
A cornered dog is dangerous, so let them run out of energy and then play your cards right.
Prison slave labor sucks though. It's not the ideal way to compete with China.
Violent / repeat yes of course. Low parole even better.
But for small shit like weed, just look what it's done to the Black community for ex
https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-much-does-the-public-need-to-know-11551312923?mod=searchresults&page=1&pos=2
As special counsel Robert Mueller finishes his investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, Attorney General William Barr faces an important decision. How much of the Mueller report should be released to the public?
Upon completing his work, Mr. Mueller is required by Justice Department rules to provide the attorney general “a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel.” We don’t know what form his report will take. It
Need a sub for rest>>>
>>5487016 /pb
As someone who has been on this kind of stuff for 20+ years, I have to say we have never been closer to critical mass than we are right now.
If you study what it takes to make change in a society, you will find it only takes about 12-16% of the populace to be awakened and to pursue justice.
I am pretty sure we are well above 16% now. The real problem for us is the DSM control of the web / tv narrative. We need to break their grip to move forward.
D5 - control of cyber space
They are doing themselves in quite well so far. But Anon's should focus on other ways to make them look like fools so moar peeps come to us for news.
It's happening. Keep your foot on the gas.