Plausible deniability. Bottom line, if you can figure that out you will understand. If you can't you simply are not intelligent enough to investigate these issues anyhow and do not belong here. But, no BS, that is the answer.
You want more bottom line that this is a scam. Someone tell me why the guy who, three years ago, claimed to be rich and retired feels compelled to say he needs money.
https://archive.fo/4enRA
Does anyone else get pretty peeved that we the taxpayer paid for two years of a literal bullshit investigation so they could write a fucking book and cash in off of it? We literally funded them so they could inevitably get funded? Are you fucking kidding me?
I have explained what my "problem" is. I do not like a commune cult leader who has a track record of being a con man claiming that he is the media of the Q anon movement and attempting to financial gain from the work of those digging into things while pretending to be involved with it.
If you want to play the accusatory game we can play it but only those who are cashing in would not see the obvious bottom line.
I won't deny that is pretty damn funny and considering how clueless liberals are I could definitely see some freaking out and leaving party.