>>5537022
Seen what before, the graphic?
It's a month old? That doesn't see weird.
Timely drop though. See my post above >>5536998
Kek is pointing us somewhere.
Currently looking at the patent linked above:
>It has been found that the resonance can be excited not only by externally applied pulsed electric fields,
>as discussed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,782,874, 5,899,922, 6,081,744, and 6,167,304, but also by pulsed magnetic fields,
>as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,935,054 and 6,238,333, by weak heat pulses applied to the skin, as discussed
>in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,800,481 and 6,091,994, and by subliminal acoustic pulses, as described in U.S. Pat.
>No. 6,017,302. Since the resonance is excited through sensory pathways, it is called a sensory resonance.
>In addition to the resonance near ½ Hz, a sensory resonance has been found near 2.4 Hz.
>An easily detectable physiological effect of an excited ½ Hz sensory resonance is ptosis of the eyelids.
>As discussed in the '922 patent, the ptosis test involves first closing the eyes about half way.
>This effect, called “chemical detuning”, can be so strong that ptosis is lost altogether when the
>stimulation frequency is kept constant in the initial stages of the excitation.
Need help looking at all these patents.