What's the deal with Apache?
They're investigating her independently from others (i.e.Weiner); could indicate investigative action towards her and her much discussed links to the awans / MB
Apache is open-source, you can get the code from them. It's community maintained, meaning that if there was a malicious insert then it is traceable.
Are you sure this anon knows what he's talking about? I am purely checking due to the fact this is a big divert if not. Apache powers 45% of all internet websites, but the code insert was in the embed code for something on 8chan, no? That's why Q requested CM to look at it (I may be wrong here hence the query regarding correctness).
What's this towards? Are you attempting to bring this up as a new topic?
This was the Spectre bug, and is the basis on which the NSA has copies of EVERYTHING. This is part of the reason the FBI's texts and emails 're-appeared'.
Are you attempting to divert resources with this or does it pertain to something relevant?
>We have been discussing activating people, MK, and all that lately so it seems an interesting connection
>Making it rain and Vault 7 were mentioned the other day, no?
OK yes - Vault7 came out early '17 - around March 4th, looks to have been lifted fall 2016.
Runs a parallel .dll to vlc and picks up important files.
Q asked who leaked Vault7 to WL. Common sense states that it was NSA, looks like it could have come from Merkel's Cyberclown Blacksite in Germany under the guise of contracators there however still could have been NSA. Also asked who fired back when Vault7 was leaked; Clowns probably but I don't know. Look at some of MegaAnon's stuff about SR / WL - Kim Dotcom assisted him directly by the sounds of it - he provided verification for this to Hannity. I don't know if he would have used Rainmaker but the timeline fits as SR had done it by then (just) and so they wouldn't be risking getting caught using the Clown's tools ultimately against them. The only way to find out is to ask Kim Dotcom or Hannity or Assange, or see if there were other footprints - however I don't think he would be daft enough to leave tracks for the Clowns to find as it would be 'Clintons' for him.
Could be MKU Trigger after Suicide Weekend
Don't read too much into it - Apache are an open source company which means their code is community maintained and developed (and therefore community checked with all of it publicly checkable and multiple, traceable people responsible for signing it off into the final build.
Apache is a server, which essentially means that it sits underneath a website and handles traffic. If two companies get into a legal war over information that has leaked or been extracted or inserted via a website, and that website uses apache as it's server (and 45% of the internet does) then at some point Apache will have handled that data.
Apache has to have the fact that it is not legally responsible for incidents such as this written into it's terms otherwise people could attempt to come after them, say in an instance where they have lost money and they can't sue the other company, the real perp. Apache has to ensure that legal responsibility is fairly reflected or mirrored onto the two real participants in this instance and not the middleman.
This is standard in contracts of companies that handle other people's data in a 'passthrough' manner.
Furthermore, Apache is generally accepted as a responsible candidate for a central role in the support of the internet as it is open source software and therefore commercial interests cannot infiltrate the company / directives of the company. Even if the Clowns, say, put a couple of people into the architecture team, because the decision to go forward and the reasons for that are made publicly (inside the community) then without the core development community approving this wouldn't happen.
Compare this with a commercial company - I don't even want to say their name as they have good lawyers, but think database - if their server was used they could put any code in there that they wanted and not disclose. Apache is a trusted vendor of community maintained software, and even if it was subverted then it would be traceable and visible.
Where is the contract - I'll explain what i mean.
For sure but Apache is not a clown op. They wouldn't be able to influence it's development / builds. Anyway, the hack was on the board wasn't it? Isn't that what everyone is looking for - 1183?
Vault7 was lifted fall 2016: Do we know who did it & why? Am I correct in my weird recurring presumption that it came out of the Cyberclown Merkeltown Blacksite in Germany? If so, it would tie wonderfully in with Dotcom. Does anyone know this for sure, and who fired and what was the retaliatory shot? Was it his assets being taken and him being forced to live in NZ (because no-one would want to live in a non-nuclear natural paradise)? Is that what happened?
FYI - read some Megaanon on the subject of him; https:// www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/795d6a/megaanon_postings_compiled_may_2017_present/
WL released first part in March 17. Were the SR files snatched by then do you reckon?
It was defnitely via mega, read mega - Kim has also verified it to Hannity. Hannity stated on air that he was sure it was him and that he had provided proof.
And Seth looked like he enjoyed a bit of 80's synth pop; would the DNC allow insecure devices to be plugged into their network?