Anonymous ID: 56e151 March 11, 2019, 9:13 a.m. No.5623915   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5623775

So then witness protection seems unlikely.

Taken out by black hats to destroy the evidence trail?

Or disappeared into a prison for debriefing by white hats?

Anonymous ID: 56e151 March 11, 2019, 9:17 a.m. No.5623970   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5623896

My standard response to anybody who advocates for censorship of 'hate' speech' or 'fake news'…

 

Who decides?

 

Because you are basically asking someone else to curate information for you.

And its a process that will always be ripe for abuse.

Anonymous ID: 56e151 March 11, 2019, 9:36 a.m. No.5624229   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4259

>>5624178

>Wikileaks helped Snowden

Or did Snowden get himself in a 'crisis' as a honeypot to draw out the Wikileaks network?

Maybe Assange thought he was genuine at that time.

Anonymous ID: 56e151 March 11, 2019, 9:46 a.m. No.5624374   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4425

>>5624291

>>5624280

It was a limited hangout with all the usual elements of enough truth to lend credibility.

 

Imagine how much they learned about people, connections, and finances of the Wikileaks network while they were busy 'helping' Snowden escape.

 

Where, if Snowden was smart, wouldn't he have made it to Ecuador BEFORE leaking the information?