Anonymous ID: 55d484 March 11, 2019, 12:32 p.m. No.5626361   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6522

RT

>>5616382

>>5617930

>>5618750

 

Had some time to think on this at work.

 

"Shall We Play A Game?

How many Tweets has POTUS 'forwarded' in the past 12-hours?

Primary topic(s)?

March Madness.

Do you have your [ ] filled in?"

Q

 

(+) link to NSA monthly puzzle tic-tac-toe

 

yields quite a message.

 

Think about layered messages and their purpose

Think about the 'rules'

 

The bible says wisdom is all and for all:

"Milk for babes, and meat for men."

 

Different observers see different things.

 

First ref to tic-tac-toe is interesting.

 

A good layered message is like a good solution(=)to

a [set] of (problems)

it can address a number of things at one, like a matrices

or x y z problems.

The important thing is that the message could

((plausibly)) AND/or (actually) mean a number of things while more likley

meaning one thing, when you look at the context

and most importantly the observer(s)

 

you wouldnt just give goals/operations

 

for one, tic-tac-toe uses X and O's

1) potential ref to that fag '_X' and his long ass posts

2)reference to 'competition' conflict as pointless

Tic-tac-toe is often thought of as a 'loop' or draw-game

even though the 2nd player fights for a draw and the 8/63 probability

 

Next the bracket is most certainly

"Team"

"Have you filled your [team] in?"

Context: March Madness

(+) following posts addressing C_A/Snowden

 

Message in general is

Attention to C_A

Doesnt want conflict (pointless/tic-tac-toe)

(pause, the question becomes 'well what then?

whats the real 'game')

Ans: past corrupt cells, Snowdens sponsorship/aid

The result…

and then the outcome.

"Have you filled your [team] in?"

"Stay Strong Gina"

 

And then Q brings up

Apache, Open Source, Free Press…

The real consequences of Snowden's 'choice.'

Are the deaths of those who used it.

I could be wrong, stunningly so; but I think 'free press'

is bait to snatch up [targets] by the "Agency"

 

I dont think Snowden ever stopped working for the C_A

Q may have even said so and this coupled with the C_A

not being harmed as much/(if) by Snowden.

 

Bigger picture: Harm No Such in order to cover your tracks

Give up piece for a position in multi-pronged attack.

 

But the "piece" now is in a bad "position"

Q reminds all observer(s) that the term "game"

was a Signal, but in the real world:

 

"This is not a game" -Q

 

I know things are exciting AND serious, but wanted to say thank you for the music Q. Ytube (+) mix magic sword in the face of evil gets good results. Also "dumb" and "ceases to be harmful" was in reference to myself.

_X

Anonymous ID: 55d484 March 11, 2019, 12:44 p.m. No.5626514   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5626331

breastplate of righteousness / your heart; principles

helmet of salvation/ your sight

belt of truth/ discipline

shoes of peace/comfort

 

Sword of truth / defend/attack Protect

_

Anonymous ID: 55d484 March 11, 2019, 12:50 p.m. No.5626582   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6836

>>5626496

interesting anon

my literacy doesnt match yours in this

but Ive thought AI will only be achieved through built in imperfection.

Only by the possibility of being imperfect, of possissing variance does one be conscious; think of not being able to fail;

A machine cannot variate/be imperfect so it cannot move outside its programming even up to X^ iteration.

 

the problem is solved by plugging in 'imperfection'

The second may be giving the machine a model

Researchesrs recently constructed an arm; gave it a simple kindergarten model of itself; and then damaged the arm, while the machine referenced the world and itself as the model

 

Its script adjusted/ until the machine was able to perform even though it was damaged.

 

It makes you appreciate being human, and the possibility of variance and imperfections.

_