Anons, here's a theory: might POTUS' tweet about MIT scientists needed to fly relate to the auto pilot and hacking causing plane crashes? Check last breads regarding Being patent & plane crashes, of course Anons know about Q's statements regarding crash frequency.
Quick background:
https://www.cnn.com/2015/05/17/us/fbi-hacker-flight-computer-systems/index.html
>A cybersecurity consultant told the FBI he hacked into computer systems aboard airliners up to 20 times and managed to control an aircraft engine during a flight, according to federal court documents.
How it's relating to Boeing and MIT directly:
https://www.aviationtoday.com/2017/11/08/boeing-757-testing-shows-airplanes-vulnerable-hacking-dhs-says/
https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/news/2018/08/01/boeing-mit-to-open-autonomous-flight-research.html
>The Boeing (NYSE: BA) Aerospace and Autonomy Center will span 100,000 square feet at 314 Main St., one of six facilities MIT has planned near the MBTA Red Line station. The center will be staffed by Boeing subsidiary Aurora Flight Sciences Corp., a Virginia-based company that Boeing acquired last fall, and will focus on the development of autonomous flight and transportation technologies, such as flying taxis or flying cargo freight vehicles.
Does MIT already have the tech to prevent this? Was/is it prevented from being put in modern aircraft?
https://www.cnet.com/news/mit-researchers-stop-hackers/
>But that's not all. Researchers also developed a wireless protocol to support the ultrafast hopping. Their research could eventually help safeguard the billions of connected devices – collectively known as the "internet of things" – that are currently vulnerable to attack.
Does it take an MIT scientist to pilot a modern airplane? Yes. POTUS correct again.