Interesting link for all who don't act like absolute DIPSHITS:

>>5653386 (pb)

By ALL MEANS, critique my reasoning, by undermining my evidence or by exposing the errors in my inferences. Or critique the manner in which I present things, and offer suggestions for improvement.

But if you can't do that: STFU!

(CLUE: I am NOT "doxxing" Q because THEY ARE BEING UTTERLY FLAGRANT IF YOU PAY ATTENTION!)

(I suspect some will soon have the thought: HOLY SHIT THAT FUCKER WAS RIGHT! Keep that in mind when you try to explain Q to your normie friends…. SERIOUSLY. Not everyone who doesn't get it is evil.)

Peace, frens.

>>5654502

Honestly, I really DON'T think it matters for most who follow Q.

But it does matter in the long term for PROVING that Q was not simply a bunch of bullshit all along, but was actually based on evidence and reasoning.

Maybe I don't need to convince anyone so long as my reasoning is logged on the board. I really don't know.

I do think that Anons need to react when they get a signal from POTUS, and they somehow need to grasp it and explain to others why Q is real.