Anonymous ID: 574ec7 March 18, 2019, 11 a.m. No.5755010   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Oleg Deripaska denies Kremlin encouraged his lawsuit against US Treasury sanctions

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/18/putin-ally-deripaska-explains-why-hes-suing-us-treasury-department.html

Anonymous ID: 574ec7 March 18, 2019, 11:28 a.m. No.5755439   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5628 >>5677

Americans Are No Fools, Trust Is Eroding In Dems ‘Witch Hunt’

 

https://saraacarter.com/americans-are-no-fools-trust-is-eroding-in-dems-witch-hunt/

Anonymous ID: 574ec7 March 18, 2019, 11:36 a.m. No.5755595   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5601 >>5617 >>5624

AP finally covered the horrific story of the Black liberation activists who have "mysteriously" died in what looks an awful lot like assassinations, with this euphemistic headline:

 

Puzzling number of men tied to Ferguson protests have died

 

https://apnews.com/436251b8a58c470eb4f69099f43f2231

Anonymous ID: 574ec7 March 18, 2019, 11:40 a.m. No.5755648   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5677 >>5684 >>5710

The Connecticut Supreme Court Just Placed the Firearms Industry Under Legal Threat

 

In the simplest terms possible, the Connecticut Supreme Court held that a lawsuit filed against Remington by the estates of nine Sandy Hook victims could proceed, based on the claim that the alleged “wrongful marketing” of the rifle used by shooter Adam Lanza “for illegal, offensive purposes was a causal factor in increasing the casualties of the Sandy Hook massacre.” Reading these words according to their plain meaning, it would seem the court is claiming that Remington literally advertised the weapon’s usefulness to criminals, but it did not. In fact, the court’s reasoning exposes the breadth of its ruling — and its direct threat to the First Amendment. Let’s break it down, piece by piece.

 

https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/03/sandy-hook-ruling-placed-firearms-industry-under-legal-threat/