(Tweet graphic updated. "Are you ready to be part of history?")

(DIE SHILLS.)

Short version:

If you get the signal, STRIKE quickly, with FORCE: launch all memes, fire all missiles and drop all truth bombs.

Long version:

Background to above:

>>5568068 (pb)

That is a summary with links to multiple posts, each analyzing different pieces of evidence. It is slightly outdated though, and contains a few mistakes that I know of. It also fails to include additional pieces of evidence. Multiple Anons have provided evidence on this - thanks. (Thanks most recently to the Anon pointing out HOW MANY 93's POTUS has tweeted… I hadn't even caught that.)

Responses to objections:

1) This is not unwisely doxxing Q, since the signal to ID the given photo was given by POTUS, as the links spell out in detail.

2) It does not matter for the reasoning whether the "I SEE a FROG" baker really had a frog in her pocket, or whether the events of United 93 happened at all like the official story. The imagery works as imagery.

Most definitely read or reread:

https://www.claremont.org/crb/basicpage/the-flight-93-election/

And for total newfags:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2qIXXafxCQ

And for those who buy the story, check out a brutal trolling of the fake news media by Anton:

>>5741413 (pb)

If I convince you, take it and run with it.

>>5785199

I will now completely ignore any comments that seem to be by shills.

Any response by anyone seeming to be a real Anon (even if you are telling me to go F myself, whatever) will get a response if I catch it. It might not always be in the same bread, but I'll try to keep track. Even if your response is highly negative on an emotional level, I will strive to focus on your intellectual standpoint.