Anonymous ID: 3d71f7 March 21, 2019, 6:21 a.m. No.5808616   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8633 >>8641

>>5808532

Looks good, baker.

You might consider removing this one …

>>5808320 Rachel Chandler Trending on Twitter

…since it isn't sauced, and it light of post below.

Or you could add below post, just put comma and space in between, like this:

>>5808320, >>5808340 Rachel Chandler Trending on Twitter for some users

 

>>5808317, >>5808338

Myself, I'm not a fan of including these kinds of unsauced claims from famefags. Could be true, but notables should either be noteworthy opinion if speculation, or offer some kind of verifiable factual support if specific claims-to-fact are made