>>5814261 lb

I'm pissed that Q came to us and told us that this will be the Great Awakening.

But nothing but riddles and re-hash.

There have so many days gone by, where someone from Q-team could have educated us (and the Normies) about a lot of things.

Things that are important, but have nothing to do with national security.

But this din't happen.

And this is, why I'm really pissed with Q and his/ their "GA".

IF someone were really honest about making us more knowledgeable about, how the world really works, a lot more could have been achieved since 2017.

And all the buzz about Rachel Chandler:

Lock her up, if she is guilty.

Don't waste our time with this shit.

>>5814394

>But then what would be the point of Qanon?

To help the people understand, who runs the work, who owns the world and how the people can get back control over their countries.

In short:

To educate people about IMPORTANT things, they don't know, so that they understand, what went wrong and can prevent it the next time.

Photos from R. Chandler are like disgusting yellow paper articles about disgusting behaviour.

As I said:

IF someone is guilty of crimes:

Lock him/ her up.

But I don't see people get locked up.

>>5814401

Yes, agreed.

And Q's latest post are important…why?

Because now the world knows about the questionable pics of Chandler?

Why doesn't Q post about the BIG people BEHIND Chandler?

Did anybody vote for Trump, to lock up Chandler?

Btw: Did Chandler get locked up?

I want answers and I'm sick of Q's questions.

>>5814416

>All I have gathered from being here is that the corruption is far worse than I ever imagined, and can probably not be fixed.

This is, what I'm thinking too.

I really wish that there will be a time, when I can get real info, info with more content, no bots, no shills and no nudes, while everybody is outraged about trafficked people.

Do Anons really believe that the pics they post, are not from people in the sex trafficking biz?

>>5814510

This is a counter psy-op to what the MSM does.

Not more, not less.

And this is not about us, we are only (sort of) used, to spread this counter psyop.

If Q-team would care to awaken us, they would have used the whole time since 2017, to educate, to awaken us.

But hey didn't.

All they do, is to spread their message, to counter the MSM.

This is something, but not enough to convince me that this is an GA, to help the people to understand, who really rules them and how.

There is NO reason, why Q couldn't have told us, who runs the world.

No reason, for letting us still in the dark about facts that are not critical to national security.

>>5814752

>It's not counter-MSM.

>It's complimentary to the MSM.

Maybe you're right, maybe I'm right, we'll see.

Be it as it may:

The MSM is not on the side of the people.

Neither is Q.

They both do their thing on behest of those, they work for.

And that is not us.

They want us quiet and compliant, they only want us to applaud them and not interfere with their plans.

I had high hopes in Trump and Q.

Today I feel, as if I let deceive myself more than I'd like to admit.

Nothing of the things that Q spoke of, that were important to me, has happened.

Are "we" winning?

I don't see that.

That's all.

>>5814814

>How do you capture a dangerous animal?

By DOING it.

You don't catch it, by TALKING.

Did anybody vote for Trump, because of Rachel Chandler? Because of locking herup?

Q does not need Anons to "dig".

This is occupational therapy. At best…