Longtime lurker and patriot here, fascinated with the RBG events and her being invisible. I would go to stand in line at the SC for public viewing during oral arguments and see her for myself, if it wasn't so far for me. Some anons must live nearby or in D.C. ??

Next best thing, I looked at the transcripts for recent SC oral arguments [March 18,19,20- 2019]

see Calendar :

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/2018TermCourtCalendar.pdf

It does not seem plausible that they would insert her into the transcripts as having been there during the argument and as having asked questions, and received answers, if she was not present ?? This would ask one to believe a conspiracy that, if true, could bring down the whole SC's integrity when revealed ?? Certainly, of the thousands of daily visitors, some would go to social media with “Her chair was empty” or “It did not look like her” . An 'impostor' would also require the other Justices knew and played along, a stretch.

Link to the recent argument transcripts with her questions/comments.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2018

After opening this link, you can click on any of the arguments in the Mar.18-27 session. When the PDF opens, go to the bottom of the page, to the alphabetical index, which will cite the page and line that her contributions appear, or allow a search for a particular word.

Not sure if I am gonna get hammered for this, or if it is helpful, its my 1st post. But I do believe in questioning everything and trying to make sense of all this independently. If she is alive and contributing, these endless discussions then make us look not credible ??