>>5874644 (pb)
There's a logical extension to that. Scope narrowed so indictments outside the scope have to come out of the equation.
Remove the indictments without specifically removing them. And it was Whittaker anyway, so Barr isn't lying.
Can you do the fandango? Kek
Gotta pace themselves I reckon anon. Long way to go yet.
>11/10/2018
>[Future Comms]
>Pre_stage ele_y
>Pre_stage sec_y
>Pre_stage dir_y
>Pre_stage cap_y
>[OnReady]
>Q
He's probably already doing it.
Imagine how hard it would have been for the plan to let Hussein win over noname…