>>5876765 pb

>>5876628 pb

^^^^

Also, How is it obstruction? Are people trying to claim Mueller was intimidated by tweets that had no threats but were merely statements of fact?

And yes, the facts were verified?

So is Mueller dishonorable to the extent he would lie in the report because of a Tweet / statement by POTUS of his own innocence; defending himself?

They need to list the tweets they claim are obstruction.

Also they need to name the crime that POTUS obstructed Justice over.

You can't have obstruction without a crime.

They are "good" at Sophistry; But if you are good a Logic they will lose, as they are.

>>5877443

>>5877496

^^^ Me too. Good book by douglas Valentine on the C_A. He was given access for interviews and they apparently trusted him. Someone at the top of the heirarchy told the rank and file they could speak with him. I think they were glad to be able to talk with someone; everything there is very compartmentalized and they may not be able to speak freely.

Or maybe they wanted their tale told, being unaware that they were criminals?

http://www.douglasvalentine.com/

"C-A as organized crime"

One takeaway from spot reading it.

they see themselves as elite modern day 'Knights" nobility. they have a code of how they treat each other; very polished and civilized [cf Comey?] But outsiders they do to them what they care to. Anything.

I connected it to the Roman Legions. And certainly they are connected to Europe and to the elites and traditions there; hence the push for "Globalization"

>>5877372

They ran out of money so anons are supposed to contribute.

It's their last hope.