How about you just leave here, never to return?
You won't be missed and you can post as much of your nonsensical opinion as you want some place else.
This is the clockthread you fuckhead. Let the anons try whatever they feel might be right, if only for the purpose of trying it out and getting a constructive feedback from the others.
There's no need for you to come here, and teach us "the ways of Q", when neither you nor anyone else has figured it out.
You're always free to contact BO asking them to delete this thread.
So hard to understand? Now, pretty please, leave, if you can't contribute constructively!
Yeah, you came here to have a constructive discussion, right?
Excuses of a weakling/liar, who's trying all kinds of shit to see what sticks:
>You can post as much nonsensical graphics as you want.
Is it hard to understand that this thread is about the hypothesis of understanding how markers, dates & times might be connected – if they are?
We're trying things out here for 9 breads now. And many of us, I'd think, don't care much if we're right or wrong – that is until Q steps in and confirms/discards it.
Until then we'll keep observing & trying, gathering every piece of crumb that might be related.
If you look at some the anons' clocks (also in the past) then there are apparent coincidences in date & clocktimes that we're not willing to dismiss as mere "coincidence". And you can think it's nonsensical as long as you want.
Now that is it – not willing to respond to your bitching any longer ….
Have a good night, and WWG1WGA!
>74 drops so far today
That was counted in UTC/ZuluTime.
Interesting … maybe that is indeed what should be used. See further below.
Finally found some time to measure Q's image with the two dots (png & pdf for better zooming).
What I did is draw some lines at the uppermost & lowermost outlines of the Q, then similarly do it with the inner outlines.
From the results a center point was computed.
For that center I drew two ellipses to see if it fits (red), and then hit the two dots with two rays, for which I computed angle & distance/radius.
What comes out is close to what you got.
Funny thing is, only for times in UTC the line close to the [:11] marker hits the day (03/28) if rotated by 90° CCW.
Assuming the 67.5° is correct, and assuming a continuous minute hand (for the days), 3 hrs would corr. to 0.75°, which is exactly half of the 1.5° the dot is further than the [:11] marker.
(Q's post in Zulu was 03/28 03:28:00)
So, if that is correct, then one would need a timezone of UTC+3 (e.g. Moscow, Tel Aviv) to be at 67.5° at 03:28:00 UTC.
Also interesting the radii (in cm) are 9.03 & 10.14, the difference of which is 1.11.
Remembering 1 year delta, in 2018 March 28th was 111 days after start of clock (12/07).
Now I am not putting too much credence in this kind of numberfagging – but this is what came out. I have my doubts it was intended, probably Kek wilt it ….
While one pixel is about 0.1°, and thus the angles should be fine (+/- 0.1°) for the given center, it is quite hard to find the exact center of the Q (see red ellipses).
Also haven't found yet what the upper dot at 16.22° might mean.
Maybe someone else has an idea…..
There was a single clockfag resident here previously, who worked on that connecting
the "Flash_Break_",
the "/* /\ /*",
the "Look there, or [here], or there, truth is behind you."
and the "[2] Q Chapters"
as in attached image (example) by mirroring the symbol-line to:
"/\ /\ /\"
and assigning them to certain days on the calendar.
Check old clockbreads (should be #2, #3 and/or #4) for more of his interesting work, if you're curious.
I tried hard to completely grasp it, but the anon was sparse with explanations unfortunately, and I back then was too dumb to ask the right questions.
>ET vs EST vs Zulu
'pologies. Really didn't mean to start that old discussion all anew.
Just noticed the anon counted number of Q posts in UTC: >>5953218
And I felt like pointing out that (in UTC) on 03/28, there was a Q post at 03:28:00, which I (and others) found a bit weird due to the two dots which were clearly visible and likely not accidental.
QClockView gives the user all freedom to use ZuluTime as well, and personally, I sometimes also look at UTC timestamps in the program (e.g. because of "The face of a watch/clock has multiple versions. ").
But I'll not risk more diversion by insisting on or even mentioning UTC, unless I see a reason – like in above example.
Here's the updated blanks after yesterday's single post.
Checked for all other days with only a single post, and there are some. But doesn't look like a pattern to me.
We did have an 11-day break before though, followed by a single post on 06/03 last year.