>>6470461

While I am still not sure if there's some smart way of "wrapping" the dates/markers, such that the clock doesn't need to grow all the time, I'll prepare another ~180 days extension taking us to 11:55 or Nov, 22nd sticking with the JFK theme.

It would most certainly depend on Q posting, I should think, as there wouldn't be much use in growing the Q-clock if there's no more Q posts…..Kek!

Not sure there's ever gonna be a parade on 11/11, nor do I know when/if the Q-clock actually runs out, or if dates can be "wrapped" – but until then, and despite some noticable degradation on mainstreet/the general there'll an updated Q-Clock.

(Sorry for current lack of activity – still trying to sort things out IRL)

>>6474338

Thanks. Should be no problem in QClockView, as the zoom is flawless there.

In the PDF would be easiest to scale down the entire graphics after it's rendered. Will check readability in the PNGs after scaling it down the vector version of the next clock.

Would be so cool to have a parade & beer w/ you guys at some point … Kek! o7

>>6490348

>DeltaFag, I don't think the ClockFags disagree with the work you have done except that you claim that the CLOCK is only a countdown timer and are missing all the "coincidences" that occur with the dates and the markers.

>That and your insulting, arrogant attitude on the main bread when people post their work from here and you post insulting images or call us retards, shills, clowns or even Anderson Cooper (apologies if that one wasn't you).

>Q wants people united, not divided. The Anons here are true Anons, not paid shills or clowns and the CLOCK we use represents their combined work over the course of the Q PLAN.

Agreed. It's the old "I have seen the truth and only my truth is what's valid." attitude.

Must be a mighty smart anon, I'm sure …

That's why for most parts I've started to ignore his posts.

Updated blanks & tweets attached.

Have a great day everyone!