>>5922362

Ty baker!

>>5922439

>But they have other deeper reasons

In a world where everyone's been brainwashed to censor their own thoughts based on whether they might "offend" others, how do you screen for free thinkers?

In a world where traditional masculinity – the heart and soul of the soldier-protector – has been eradicated everywhere, how do you screen for those willing defend it?

In an environment absent personal identity, existing solely on written thought and abstract image, how do you convey the depth of what it means to be human, the urge to love, the reason we fight?

>>5922818

In the sense that the true feminine faculty is receptive, humble, and nurturing, sure.

But everything (((they))) push is a perversion of the natural. Men are the worst of women, and women are the worst of men.

Because we also need a return of the true masculine too, which has been demonized, turned into passive, mewling soiboi nonsense, reduced to allowing their countries to be invaded and their women and children to be raped right under their noses

While the natural warlike aggression of men has been given to the worst of the womanish faculties: micro-managing nanny-state bullshit, emotional manipulation unto suicidal hopelessness, keeping children trapped as forever children rather than raising them up to be independent thinkers