>>5939360 lb
There must be some law against it or everyone would do it. What protections are provided persons who agree to testify only in private against disclosure? Too early to dig thru law. Yes or no will suffice.
Baker
Is it possible to have in globals not to use JPEG for caps? I'm sure there are many anons who are not aware.
Just add it to the dough. As it is an Admin type post, which is the purpose of globals, no approval should be needed. IF BO has an issue with it (he won't), he can remove it.
Have a great day. I'll probably hit it next baker with it. It's annoying to try to look at pics linked to Q's drops and it not be visible.
>classified info - ongoing investigation
Jr's testimony was part of on going investigation. House Intel Cmte can certainly classify information and testimony. Many agencies have classifying authority of their intel.
All is moot if no one is willing to go thru with removing Schitt. I have zero confidence in DOJ to do it's job.
Wasn't talking about removing him. I was talking about charging him with a crime.
And we both know the House will never remove him.
>Merely being part of an investigation does not make it secret
Ridiculous statement. I never said it did. If you re read it, I said they have the ability to classify what they want to as part of their investigation.
My bad for making that jump in my mind and not in the post.
>That evidence doesn't currently exist.
We have no idea what evidence exist and investigations are suppose to remain out of the public eye. So to say…
>without enormous publicly known evidence of heinous crims
is total BS.
I'll give but 1 example of DOJ not doing it's job with regards to Congress. A sitting US Senator is employing 3 illegal aliens against federal law and DOJ turns a blind eye.
Ready to drop the subject now.
>Congress can't classify information that isn't classified in the first place
Actually, they can classify all information in their on going investigation. Thought I made that clear.
We'll talk again when you have gotten some reading comprehension because clearly, once again, you have failed to understand what I have written.
Have a nice day.
BREAKING
Fackbook being charged by the Feds. Stay tuned…after commercial break!
wow…you are really triggered by …something. Whatevs. Just glad you think the DOJ is not corrupt and tried to overthrow a sitting President. Don't bother with a reply because you totally misunderstood my intent and any further discussions will lead to you calling moar names and me filtering.
hmmmm….interesting. Guess we'll find out.
Correct. That's the whole point of making it a global. Anons need to do the conversion and only post .png or .jpg. Not bakers.
Did you watch Tucker last night?
I missed it until a repeat. It's worth finding and watching. Tuck showed Pelosi yesterday saying in a speech " We need to talk about healthcare" and just like that…MSM talks about healthcare. Every single station and every single show. After 2 yrs of all Russia, with a whisper from the Boss poof, it's all about healthcare.
TUCKER made the connection on national tv.
KEK. Tuck didn't even have to break a sweat slaying that dragon.
But I was telling other anon how Tucker made the connection of how the Dems Pelosi controls the MSM. Facts to back it up. Yet, none seem to be making a big deal of it, at least that I have seen. It's pretty huge, imo. It's what we have known but normies didn't. Proof MSM is an arm of the Dem's.
Wonder why (((THEY))) are working hard to take down PM.
Indeed. PM must be a threat.
You can search utube for F&F, then forward thru the 3+ hours.
Tucker is great. I see him surpassing Hannity. Anyway, I really wish moar would pay attention to it. Tucker is right. MSM is nothing moar than a super PAC and someone needs to report them to FEC. I wish someone would get that segment so it could be spread far and wide. We have a voice but it's not being used.
Are you baking now?
Are you baking?
>chat with someone share opinions on a dig
What I want as well. Digs and opinions are often drowned out here after Q has posted. Would it be appropriate to share where you go?
Cool. LB outgoing baker requested anons post not using jpeg because when viewed later, pic will not show. I never knew until then that's why some pics aren't viewable. It's a PITA when jpeg is used as a cap on Q drops.
Would you please consider making a global notes to inform anons to convert all jpeg to either .png or .jpg? It would make life so much better and take responsibility off baker to do conversion.