>>5957158 (pb)

>conf_ GIVE EM HELL BOYS!!!

>https://twitter.com/PeterAlexander/status/1111405585067433985

Proud of anons right now. The comments were all very civil and reasonable. (I don't Twitter myself. I tried it once in 2009 but didn't inhale)

One reply though I couldn't make heads nor tails of (pic related), but if the person is complaining about DeVos funding cuts, it reminded me of specialolympicsanon's revelations here recently. I wonder if the administration knows about those dodgy practices going on with the committees?

>>5958852

Looks like he's basing a lot of what he is saying (first letter) on media reports. We know now those were part of the smear campaign. He (Reid) therefore looks like he might just have bought in to the collusion delusion.

The second letter is interesting. I really can't pin down Comey's motives at this point, Reid makes good points! Except that I always took Comey's announcement as a good thing for Hillary. The fact that Reid takes such umbrage makes Comey look like a good guy (from our point of view).

Was Comey a patsy?

>>5958946

Interdasting.

>>5959018

I just had a look through some of the FOIA stuff in the vault. Didn't find anything and got side tracked on Benghazi, kek.

https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/Hillary%20R.%20Clinton%20Part%2022%20of%2030/view

>>5959199

Besides that, a guy invented a thing called windscreen wipers for pinning things like that under, kek.

(then they stole the idea from him and duped him out of a lot of patent money, apparently)

>>5959224

Yeah, except I hate that too. It's messing with my personal property, kek. But yeah, far less intrusive than … glue.

There's lots of ways to do it anyway, just put flyers on notice boards, drop a pile at the library, bus stop, fast food joint, etc.

>>5959226

Vandalism is messing with other people's property. No two ways about it.

>>5959239

What kind of conversation has this devolved in to!

(but, you can 'draw' directly in dirt with a stick, kek)

>>5959243

We don't want them here anyway. If anons want to spread the word locally they should point to one of the qmap.pub type sites, but even that wouldn't do much I think. A bunch of Q drops starting from that day is not going to mean much to a normie, even one curious enough check it out.

No, I think you're right. It will spread organically or the mainstream media v3.0 will start making documentaries about it. But if anons are determined enough to put flyers out I would suggest a single short self contained proof of something with a link to a Q drop site. Nothing too wordy or conspiracy theory looking, kek.

>>5959271

But but, muh glue…

(just for keks, don't worry about it misunderstoodanon)

>>5959347

Seconded

>>5959363

Hey, Q's drop earlier was interesting. I did not know about misprision… Or whatever, kek. Lots of people to get in that one.

>>5959367

>>5959371

So basically, have a look thorough this. Q might not always be talking about treason. That's just the worst of it.