Anonymous ID: 00d7f1 March 8, 2018, 7:48 p.m. No.596540   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6544 >>6552 >>6561 >>6823

>>596466

>Why did H-wood glorify Titanic as a tragic love story?

On FOX the other day, there was a snippet of an upcoming interview with a NK defector.

The guy was talking about the movie Titanic, contrasting it to the overtly political propaganda crap they show in NK.

He then explained how jarring it was when he first saw a non-political movie like Titanic, that it was just a movie, a love story.

BUT…anons know better, that it actually distorted a VERY POLITICAL historical event.

>Why did H-wood glorify Titanic as a tragic love story?

The answer lies in this guy's reaction…the non-political plot fools normies into never questioning the actual historical event any deeper than what the movie shows them.

Thus, helping to create SHEEP, placated only by bread and circuses.

Subtle brainwashing. And history is essentially rewritten for those who don't bother to question. SAD!

Anonymous ID: 00d7f1 March 8, 2018, 7:55 p.m. No.596606   🗄️.is 🔗kun

EO PDF FILE

2018 Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States

https:// www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2018-03-08/pdf/2018-04860.pdf

 

It's a 465-page whopper!

Anonymous ID: 00d7f1 March 8, 2018, 8:31 p.m. No.597031   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>596823

There were a lot of real-life expeditions around that time too, if I remember correctly. You may be on to something there, anon. There is proof somewhere.

I think of the soundtrack too…sort of like a spell…mention the movie and everybody thinks of that damn song. It was all they could play back then.

And on that, I still say James Horner's plane crash death was sketchy as fuck.