>>5998564 (LB)

>Usually the most obvious explanation is the one that's correct.

Usually, but not always.

>In this case, that would be that Gorka is legit and Q is bullshit

This is a case where both could be, simply because of the

reasons that I mentioned before. If Q is legit, then Gorka is playing

the adversarial role of distancing Trump until they are ready for the

big reveal.

>(and if so, Q is Trump-endorsed bullshit or he would have said himself that Q is crap) .

Maybe, but that's also the biggest reason to believe Q is legit.

Having a rogue element corralling this many people (worldwide)

is dangerous. He could end it by saying the same thing as Gorka.

In fact, he absolutely should because it risks his re-election.

He hasn't.

As for the rest, I just don't agree that Trump is doing that to us.

There are too many indicators otherwise.

>>5998637

Good point. Bleeding all over 26 miles.

>>5998653

^^^^^ THIS!

He won't need a pardon. Once it all comes out, his charges will be

dismissed.

>>5998695

Well, for starters, if they hit 1500 MPH they absolutely broke the sound

barrier. But other than that, I've heard nothing.

>>5998752

Truth.

Interestingly, he's being discussed again even though his case doesn't

come up again till July. Makes an anon wonder.

>>5998731

He was running a sting, anon. Mueller didn't bankrupt him - he sold

his summer vacation house that was planned to be sold anyway.

He set Strzok and Pientka up (well, maybe Pientka knew). It's likely

he had the whole interview recorded as he gave them a tour of the WH.

Yeah, he actually led them all around the WH, all the areas that

were being "cleaned" because of the "bugs."

>>5998764

Yup, and every one of your assumptions changes meaning once you

realize why RR did what he did and what RM was really investigating.

Every single one.

>>5999030

Betting this is just to appease his more conservative supporters, particularly

those in the hard-core pro-life camp (by hard-core, I mean those that think

anything after conception murder). Nobody ever cites an actual source

when they mention Barrett. It's always "sources close to Trump" and

similar, like we so often hear from the fake news.

If you think about it, it makes sense. Get the left stirred up thinking that

RvW is going to overturned they expend a ton of energy coming up with

ways to shoot Barrett down, then Trump nominates someone else.

All that effort wasted.

At least, that's how he seems to operate.

>>5999202

Many will likely resign out of shame. There's no Constitutional or

otherwise legal means to force them out. It won't be difficult to justify

repealing any laws that he was pushing (Obamacare is already done

anyway). There will be some pushback, but again, once everything

comes out, even that will be minimal.

>>5999327

So you think Trump was a fool to appoint Wray? Got it - now we know

where your true loyalty lies.