Anonymous ID: 3711bd March 31, 2019, 7:21 p.m. No.5998694   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8813

>>5998556 LB

 

Can't take credit for another anon's analysis.

Was >>2150693 from an archives search.

 

This entire case and the apparently labyrinthine legal strategy swirling around it are fascinating.

 

Holy cow. Look at this from 2017: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-22/former-us-attorney-awan-indictment-there-something-very-strange-going-here

 

Can't decide if I should be annoyed at some Republican Congressmen being dense and short-sighted, or to be relieved that Barr seems to be pressing the buttons in the correct order in the plan.

Anonymous ID: 3711bd March 31, 2019, 7:30 p.m. No.5998807   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8888

>>5998775

Talk about YMGTOW.

The idiots have managed to accidentally draft an army, one already trained in digital warfare.

That army will reelect Trump and likely the next several US presidents to follow.

With any luck, they will utterly destroy the Democratic Party.

Anonymous ID: 3711bd March 31, 2019, 7:47 p.m. No.5999000   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9206

>>5998813

Where there's smoke.

 

"So . . . what’s the best evidence you could possibly have, the slam-dunk proof that their goal was to steal the money and never look back? That’s easy: One after the other, the wife and husband pulled up stakes and tried to high-tail it to Pakistan after they’d wired the funds there — the wife successfully fleeing, the husband nabbed as he was about to board his flight.

 

 

Well, here’s a peculiar thing about the Justice Department’s indictment of Imran Awan and Hina Alvi, the alleged fraudster couple who doubled as IT wizzes for Debbie Wasserman Schultz and many other congressional Democrats: There’s not a word in it about flight to Pakistan. The indictment undertakes to describe in detail four counts of bank-fraud conspiracy, false statements on credit applications, and unlawful monetary transactions, yet leaves out the most damning evidence of guilt.

 

 

In fact, the indictment appears to go out of its way not to mention it.

 

 

Why would prosecutors leave that out of their indictment? Why give Awan’s defense a basis to claim that, since the indictment does not allege anything about flight to Pakistan, the court should bar any mention of it during the trial? In fact, quite apart from the manifest case-related reasons to plead instances of flight, a competent prosecutor would have included them in the indictment simply to underscore that Awan is a flight risk who should have onerous bail conditions or even be detained pretrial."

 

They just fucking let Hina Alvi go, when they HAD her leaving the country with over $10,000 cash. They let her go.

 

And then there is just the continued secrecy surrounding the case. Why did the U.S. Attorney's office decide against filing a press release in a case that has garnered significant national attention? Why was the case filed in a district where DWS's brother has been an assistant U.S. attorney for many years?

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-22/former-us-attorney-awan-indictment-there-something-very-strange-going-here

 

Another key fact is that Jessie Liu met with Trump privately. Not standard operating procedure.

Anonymous ID: 3711bd March 31, 2019, 7:50 p.m. No.5999032   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Now that Jessie Liu's taken her name out of consideration

That post is still open

Who's on the short list to take that spot now?

What lawyers are (1) a good fit, and (2) available?

Anonymous ID: 3711bd March 31, 2019, 8:07 p.m. No.5999286   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5999114

What if that other prosecutor was one Preet Bharara?

I remember a day when people thought he was a white hat.

Then suddenly, abruptly, he started making liberal noises.

Was curious about why the sudden change of heart.

I have to wonder if it's real.